Arguing and explaining classifications

Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 983-989

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Serrurier, Mathieu ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Classification

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; CLASSIFICATION; CONCEPT LEARNING; FORMAL ARGUMENTATIONS; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; TRAINING EXAMPLES; VERSION SPACES;

FAULT DETECTION; FUZZY CLUSTERING; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 60349128795     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1329125.1329319     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. Int. Journal of Automated Reasoning, Volume 29 (2):125-169, 2002.
2. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
3. S. A. Gómez and C. I. Chesñevar. Integrating defeasible argumentation with fuzzy art neural networks for pattern classification. In Proc. ECML '03, Dubrovnik, September 2003.
4. T. Mitchell. Generalization as search. Artificial intelligence, 18:203-226, 1982.
5. th European Conference, on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI'06.
6. S. Muggleton. Inverse entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing, 13:245-286, 1995.
7. H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 7:25-75, 1997.
8. J. R. Quinlan. Learning logical definitions from relations. Machine Learning, 5:239-266, 1990.
9. G. R. Simari and R. P. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 53:125-157, 1992.
10. st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pages 59-70, 2006.