Motor Task Variation Induces Structural Learning

Current Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 352-357

  Braun, Daniel A ^a,b   Aertsen, Ad ^b   Wolpert, Daniel M ^a   Mehring, Carsten ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

SYSNEURO

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION; VISION;

HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 60349120775     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.036     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bernstein N.A. The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements (1967), Pergamon Press, Oxford, NY
2. Poggio T., and Bizzi E. Generalization in vision and motor control. Nature 431 (2004) 768-774
3. Abeele S., and Bock O. Mechanisms for sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input. Exp. Brain Res. 139 (2001) 248-253
4. Bock O., Schneider S., and Bloomberg J. Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation. Exp. Brain Res. 138 (2001) 359-365
5. Roller C.A., Cohen H.S., Kimball K.T., and Bloomberg J.J. Variable practice with lenses improves visuo-motor plasticity. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 12 (2001) 341-352
6. Thoroughman K.A., and Shadmehr R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407 (2000) 742-747
7. Welch R.B., Bridgeman B., Anand S., and Browman K.E. Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement. Percept. Psychophys. 54 (1993) 195-204
8. McCracken H.D., and Stelmach G.E. A test of the schema theory of discrete motor learning. J. Mot. Behav. 9 (1977) 193-201
9. Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference (1988), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
10. Boyen, X., Friedman, N., and Koller, D. (1999). Discovering the hidden structure of complex dynamic systems. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-99), Morgan Kaufmann, 91-100.
11. Friedman, N. (1998). The Bayesian structural EM algorithm. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-98), Morgan Kaufmann, 129-139.
12. Jordan M.I. Learning in Graphical Models. 1st MIT Press Edition (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
13. Buntine W.L. A guide to the literature on learning probabilistic networks from data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 8 (1996) 195-210
14. Åström K.J., and Wittenmark B. Adaptive Control. Second Edition (1995), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
15. Pouget A., and Snyder L.H. Computational approaches to sensorimotor transformations. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 1192-1198
16. Poggio T. A theory of how the brain might work. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 55 (1990) 899-910
17. Vapnik V.N. Statistical Learning Theory (1998), Wiley, New York
18. Krakauer J.W., Ghez C., and Ghilardi M.F. Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: Consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 473-478
19. Miall R.C., Jenkinson N., and Kulkarni K. Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: A re-examination of motor interference. Exp. Brain Res. 154 (2004) 201-210
20. Davidson P.R., and Wolpert D.M. Motor learning and prediction in a variable environment. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13 (2003) 232-237
21. Takahashi C.D., Scheidt R.A., and Reinkensmeyer D.J. Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment. J. Neurophysiol. 86 (2001) 1047-1051
22. Scheidt R.A., Dingwell J.B., and Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Learning to move amid uncertainty. J. Neurophysiol. 86 (2001) 971-985
23. Witney A.G., Vetter P., and Wolpert D.M. The influence of previous experience on predictive motor control. Neuroreport 12 (2001) 649-653
24. Karniel A., and Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment?. Exp. Brain Res. 143 (2002) 520-524
25. Wigmore V., Tong C., and Flanagan J.R. Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 (2002) 447-457
26. Abraham W.C., and Bear M.F. Metaplasticity: The plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 19 (1996) 126-130
27. Burge J., Ernst M.O., and Banks M.S. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. J. Vis. 8 (2008) 20.1-19
28. Zarahn E., Weston G.D., Liang J., Mazzoni P., and Krakauer J.W. Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: Linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient. J. Neurophysiol. 100 (2008) 2537-2548
29. Diedrichsen J. Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 1675-1679
30. Wagner M.J., and Smith M.A. Shared internal models for feedforward and feeback control. J. Neurosci. 28 (2008) 10663-10673
31. Steyvers M., Tenenbaum J.B., Wagenmakers E.J., and Blum B. Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cogn. Sci. 27 (2003) 453-489
32. Griffiths T.L., and Tenenbaum J.B. Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognit. Psychol. 51 (2005) 334-384
33. Harlow H.F. The formation of learning sets. Psychol. Rev. 56 (1949) 51-65
34. Gallese V., and Lakoff G. The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22 (2005) 455-479
35. Hochreiter S., Younger A.S., and Conwell P.R. Learning to learn using gradient descent. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2130 (2001) 87-94