Investigating sample pooling strategies for DIGE experiments to address biological variability

Proteomics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 388-397

  Karp, Natasha A ^a   Lilley, Kathryn S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biological variation; DIGE; Pooling; Power; Two dimensional gel electrophoresis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POWER ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SAMPLE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BRAIN CHEMISTRY; CARBOCYANINES; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; FLUORESCENT DYES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC VARIATION; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 60349112456     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200800485     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Karp, N. A., Spencer, M., Lindsay, H., O'Dell, K. et al., Impact of replicate types on proteomic expression analysis. J. Pro- teome Res. 2005, 4, 1867-1871.
2. Karp, N. A., Lilley, K. S., Maximising sensitivity for detecting changes in protein expression: Experimental design using minimal CyDyes. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3105-3115.
3. Karp, N., Lilley, K., Design and analysis issues in quantitative proteomics studies. Pract. Proteomics 2007, 7, 42-50.
4. Houtman, R., Krijgsveld, J., Kool, M., Romijn, E. P. et al., Lung proteome alterations in a mouse model for nonallergic asthma. Proteomics 2003, 3, 2008-2018.
5. Castano, E. M., Roher, A. E., Esh, C. L., Kokjohn, T. A. et al., Comparative proteomics of cerebrospinal fluid in neuro- pathologically-confirmed Alzheimer's disease and non- demented elderly subjects. Neurol. Res. 2006, 28, 155-163.
6. Weinkauf, M., Hiddemann, W., Dreyling, M., Sample pooling in 2-D gel electrophoresis: A new approach to reduce nonspecific expression background. Electrophoresis 2006, 27, 4555-4558.
7. Neubauer, H., Clare, S. E., Kurek, R., Fehm, T. et al., Breast cancer proteomics by laser capture microdissection, sample pooling, 54-cm IPG IEF, and differential iodine radioisotope detection. Electrophoresis 2006, 27, 1840-1852.
8. Peng, X., Wood, C., Blalock, E., Chen, K. et al., Statistical implications of pooling RNA samples for microarray experiments. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4,26.
9. Kendziorski, C., Irizarry, R. A., Chen, K. S., Haag, J. D. et al., On the utility of pooling biological samples in microarray experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 4252-4257.
10. Jensen, J., Acta Mathematica 1906, 30, 175-193.
11. Gan, C. S., Chong, P. K., Pham, T. K., Wright, P. C., Technical, experimental, and biological variations in isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). J. Proteome Res. 2007 6,821-827.
12. Valcu, C. M., Valcu, M., Reproducibility of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis at different replication levels. J. Pro- teome Res. 2007, 6, 4677-4683.
13. Zhang, X., Guo, Y., Song, Y., Sun, W. et al., Proteomic analysis of individual variation in normal livers of human beings using difference gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2006, 6, 5260-5268.
14. Karp, N., Feret, R., Rubtsov, D., Lilley, K., Comparison of DIGE and post-stained gel electrophoresis with both traditional and SameSpots analysis for quantiative proteomics. Proteomics 2008, 8, 948-960.
15. Prabakaran, S., Swatton, J. E., Ryan, M. M., Huffaker, S. J. et al., Mitochondrial dysfunction in Schizophrenia: Evidence for compromised brain metabolism and oxidative stress. Mol. Psychiatry 2004, 9, 684-697.
16. Casasoli, M., Spadoni, S., Lilley, K. S., Cervone, F. et al., Identification by 2-D DIGE of apoplastic proteins regulated by oligogalacturonides in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proteomics 2008, 8, 1042-1054.
17. Eppig, J. T., Blake, J. A., Bult, C. J., Kadin, J. A. et al., The mouse genome database (MGD): Newfeatures facilitating a model system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, D630-D637.
18. Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D. et al., Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25-29.
19. McIntosh, M., The need to characterize and report the normal heterogeneity of proteins in clinical biological samples. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 2913.
20. Mary-Huard, T., Daudin, J. J., Baccini, M., Biggeri, A. et al., Biases induced by pooling samples in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, i313-i318.
21. Zhang, S. D., Gant, T. W., Effect of pooling samples on the efficiency of comparative studies using microarrays. Bioin- formatics 2005, 27, 4378-4383.
22. Karp, N. A., McCormick, P. S., Russell, M. R., Lilley, K. S., Experimental and statistical considerations to avoid false conclusions in proteomic studies using differential in-gel electrophoresis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 1354-1364.
23. Hynd, M. R., Lewohl, J. M., Scott, H. L., Dodd, P. R., Biochemical and molecular studies using human autopsy brain tissue. J. Neurochem. 2003, 85, 543-562.
24. Newman, J. R., Ghaemmaghami, S., Ihmels, J., Breslow, D. K. et al., Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 2006, 441, 840-846.