Absolute blood contrast concentration and blood signal saturation on myocardial perfusion MRI: Estimation from CT data

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 205-210

  Ishida, Masaki ^a   Sakuma, Hajime ^a   Murashima, Shuichi ^a   Nishida, Junko ^a   Senga, Masayo ^a   Kobayasi, Shigeki ^a   Takeda, Kan ^a   Kato, Noriyuki ^a  

^a MIE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Blood concentration; Computed tomography; Contrast medium; Myocardial perfusion MRI

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IOPAMIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD OXYGEN TENSION; BLOOD SAMPLING; BODY WEIGHT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IOPAMIDOL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 60349110366     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21470     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-2235.
2. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108:432-437.
3. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R, et al. Myocardial first-pass per-fusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 2004;110:732-737.
4. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, et al. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 2003;229:209-216.
5. Jerosch-Herold M, Seethamraju RT, Swingen CM, et al. Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:758-770.
6. Fritz-Hansen T, Rostrup E, Larsson HBW, et al. Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: a step toward quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:225-231.
7. Thijs VN, Somford DM, Bammer R, et al. Influence of arterial input function on hypoperfusion volumes measured with perfusion-weighted imaging. Stroke 2004;35:94-98.
8. Ress CR, Merchun G, Becker GJ, Klatte EC, Mail JT, Mulry C. In vitro study of high-pressure catheters and various contrast agents. Radiology 1988;166:53-56.
9. Chang CA. Magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents design and physicochemical properties of gadodiamide. Invest Radiol 1993;28: S21-S27.
10. Goldstein HA, Kashanian FK, Blumetti RF, Holyoak WL, Hugo FP, Blumenfield DM. Safety assessment of gadopentetate dimeglumine in U.S. clinical trials. Radiology 1990;174:17-23.
11. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, et al. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-881.
12. Maki JH, Price MR, Chenevert TC. Optimizing three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 1998;33:528-537.
13. Frayne R, Omary RA, Unal O, et al. Determination of optimal injection parameters for intraarterial gadolinium-enhance MR angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:1277-1284.
14. Frayne R, Grist TM, Swan JS, et al. 3D MR DSA: effects ofinjection protocol and image masking. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:476-487.
15. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Prince MR, et al. Arterial-phase three-dimensional gadolinium magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries. Invest Radiol 1998;33:506-514.
16. Gatehouse PD, Elkington AG, Ablitt NA, et al. Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high-dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:39-45.
17. Elkington AG, He T, Gatehouse PD, et al. Optimization of the arterial input function for myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:354-359.
18. Christian TF, Rettmann DW, Aletras AH, et al. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232:677-684.
19. Hsu LY, Rhoads KL, Holly JE, et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual-bolus contrast-enhanced first-pass MRI technique in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:315-322.
20. Kostler H, Ritter C, Lipp M, et al. Prebolus quantitative MR heart perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:296-269.
21. Ritter C, Brackertz A, Sandstede J, et al. Absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion under adenosine stress. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:844-849.
22. Judd RM, Reeder SB, May-Newman K. Effects of water exchange on the measurement ofmyocardial perfusion using paramagnetic contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:334-342.
23. Larsson HB, Rosenbaum S, Fritz-Hansen T. Quantification of the effect of water exchange in dynamic contrast MRI perfusion measurements in the brain and heart. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:272-281.
24. Slavin GS, Wolff SD, Gupta SN, Foo TKF. First-pass myocardial perfusion MR imaging with interleaved notched saturation: feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219:258-263.