The Iranian version of Angina Pectoris characteristics questionnaire: Reliability assessment

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 694-699

  Najafi Ghezeljeh, Tahereh ^a,b   Kassaye Tessama, Mesfin ^b   Yadavar Nikravesh, Mansoureh ^a   Ekman, Inger ^c   Emami, Azita ^b  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Chest pain; Coronary heart disease; Instrument stability; Internal consistency; Iran; Reliability test

Indexed keywords

ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; IRAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; THORAX PAIN; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANGINA PECTORIS; CHEST PAIN; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; IRAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 60349109112     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02573.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anthony D (1999) Understanding Advanced Statistics. Churchill Living Stone, Edinburgh.
2. Bass EB, Follansbee WP Orchard TJ (1989) Comparison of a supplemented rose questionnaire to exercise thallium testing in men and women. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 42, 385 394.
3. Baumgarter TA (1989) Norm-referenced measurement: reliability. In Measurement Concepts in Physical Education and Exercise Science (Safrit MJ TM Wood eds). Champaign, Illinois, pp. 45 72.
4. Bruton A, Conway H Holgate ST (2000) Reliability: what is it and how is it measured? Physiotherapy 86, 94 99.
5. Burkhardet C Bjelle A (1994) A Swedish version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 23, 77 81.
6. Burns N Grove SK (2001) The Practice of Nursing Research. Saunders, Philadelphia.
7. Burns N Grove SK (2005) The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique and Utilization. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia.
8. Chinn S (1991) Statistics in respiratory medicine. 2. Repeatability and method comparison. Thorax 46, 454 456.
9. Fain JA (2004) Reading, Understanding and Applying Nursing Research: A Text and Workbook. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia.
10. Fischbacher CM, Bhopal R, Unwin N, White M Alberti K (2001) The Performance of the Rose Angina Questionnaire in South Asian and European Origin Populations: A Comparative Study in Newcastle, UK. International Journal of Epidemiology 30, 1009 1016.
11. Georgoudis G, Watson PJ Oldham JA (2000) The development and validation of a greek version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire. European Journal of Pain 4, 275 281.
12. Georgoudis G, Oldham JA Watson PJ (2001) Reliability and sensitivity measures of the greek version of the short-form of the McGill pain questionnaire. European Journal of Pain 5, 109 118.
13. Grafton K, Foster N Wright C (2002) Evaluation of the test-retest reliability of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 88, 108.
14. Grafton KV, Foster NE Wright CC (2005) Test-retest reliability of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficients and limits of agreement in patients with osteoarthritis. Clinical Journal of Pain 21, 73 82.
15. Hensley Rl (1999) A review of operations management studies using scale development techniques. Journal of Operations Management 17, 343 358.
16. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM Karoly P (1991) Coping with chronic pain: a critical review of the literature. Pain 47, 249 283.
17. Najafi Ghezeljeh T, Ekman I, Yadavar Nikravesh M Emami A (2008) Adaptation and validation of the Iranian version of Angina Pectoris Characteristics Questionnaire. International Journal of Nursing Practice 14, 470 476.
18. Rankin G Stokes M (1998) Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clinical Rehabilitation 12, 187 199.