Failure prevention in design through effective catalogue utilization of historical failure events

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 469-481

  Grantham Lough, K A ^a   Stone, R B ^a   Tumer, Irem Y ^b  

^a MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b 1148 Kelley Engineering Center Corvallis   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Failure analysis; Failure prevention; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

CORPORATE MEMORIES; ENGINEERING FAILURES; FAILURE EVENTS; FAILURE PREVENTION; FAILURE RISKS; LINGUISTIC DATABASE; LINGUISTIC INFORMATIONS; REPORTING SYSTEMS; RISK OF FAILURES; SPECIFIC AREAS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; DESIGN; DISASTER PREVENTION; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; LINGUISTICS; PRODUCT DESIGN; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RELIABILITY; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SAFETY FACTOR;

FAILURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 60349107055     PISSN: 15477029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11668-008-9160-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Beiter, K.A., CheldAlin, B., Ishii, K.: Assembly quality method: a tool in aid of product strategy, design, and process improvement. In: Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, Baltimore, MD (2000)
2. Hawkins, P.G., Woolons, D.J.: Failure modes and effects analysis of complex engineering systems using functional models. Artif. Intell. Eng. 12, 375-395 (1998)
3. Wirth, R., et al.: Knowledge-based support anlysis for the analysis of failure modes and effects. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 9(3), 219-229 (1996)
4. Kurfman, M., Rajan, J., Stone, R., Wood, K., Stock, M.: Experimental studies assessing the repeatability of a functional modeling derivation method. J. Mech. Des. 125(4), 682-693 (2003)
5. Otto, K., Wood, K.: Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering, Systematic Design, and New Product Development. Prentice-Hall, New York (2001)
6. Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Szykman, S., Wood, K.: A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Res. Eng. Des. 13(2), 65-82 (2002)
7. Miles, L.: Techniques of Value Analysis Engineering. McGraw-Hill (1972)
8. Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Design Council, London (1984)
9. Greer, J., Stock, M., Stone, R., Wood, K.: Enumerating the component space: First steps toward a design naming convention for mechanical parts. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Chicago, IL (2003)
10. Tumer, I., Stone, R., Bell, D.: Requirements for a failure mode taxonomy for use in conceptual design. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm (2003)
11. Collins, J.A., Hagan, B.T., Bratt, H.M.: The failure experience matrix: a useful design tool. ASME J. Eng. Ind. August, 1074-1079 (1976)
12. Barbour, G.L.: Failure model and effects analysis by matrix method. In: Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (1977)
13. Collins, J.A.: Mechanical Reliability and Design. Wiley (1993)
14. Goddard, P.L., Dussalt, H.B.: The automated matrix FMEA-A logistics engineering tool. In: Proceedings of the Society of Logistics Engineers' 19th Annual Symposium (1984)
15. Henning, S., Paasch, R.: Diagnostic analysis of mechanical systems. In: Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, Baltimore, MD (2000)
16. Grantham Lough, K., Stone, R., Tumer, I.: Function based risk assessment: Mapping function to likelihood. In: Proceedings of 2005 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference, September 24-28, Long Beach, CA
17. Grantham Lough, K., Stone, R., Tumer, I.: The risk in early design (RED) method. J. Eng. Des. on-line November 21, 2007, edition, hardcopy pending
18. Grantham Lough, K., Stone, R., Tumer, I.: Prescribing and implementing the risk in early design (RED) method. J. Ind. Syst. Eng., publication pending
19. Stone, R., Tumer, I., Van Wie, M.: The function failure design method. J. Mech. Des. 127(3), 397-407 (2005)
20. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. DSMC Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition, 2nd edn. Defense Systems Management College Press, Fort Belvoir, VA (1999)
21. Van Wie, M., Grantham Lough, K., Stone, R., Barrientos, F., Tumer, I.: An analysis of risk and function information in early stage design. Submitted to Proceedings of Design Engineering Technical Conference DETC, Long Beach, CA (2005)
22. ASM International. Handbook of Case Histories in Failure Analysis, vol. 1, pp. 3-8. USA (1992)
23. Wang, J., Roush, M.: What Every Engineer Should Know About Risk Engineering and Management. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (2002)
24. Uder, S., Stone, R., Tumer, I.: Function based risk assessment and failure prediction for unmanned space missions. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress IMECE 2004-60846
25. Brown, A.F.: Development of a method for flight anomaly characterization. JPL Technical Report, JPL D-11382. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA (1994)
26. Quinn, J.D.: Flight P/FRs and the design review process. JPL Technical Report, JPL D-11381. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasedena, CA (1994)
27. National Transportation Safety Board. www.ntsb.gov (2001)
28. Wikipedia, "Galileo spacecraft." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Galileo⊃acecraft (2006)
29. NASA, Public Lessons Learned System Database. http://www.spaceref.com/ news/viewsrtype.html?id=36&sdb=nasacenters&name=NASA+Public+ Lessons+Learned+System+(PLLS)+Database (2004)
30. NASA, Public Lessons Learned System Database, PLLS Data Entry: 0305. http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsrtype.html?id=36&sdb= nasacenters&name=NASA+Public+Lessons+Learned+System+(PLLS)+Database (2004)