Editorial

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-4

  Kozlowski, Steve W J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 60349093244     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014990     Document Type: Editorial

References (18)

1. Behfar K.J., Peterson R.S., Mannix E.A., and Trochim W.M.K. The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008) 170-188
2. Brumback R.A. Worshiping false idols: The impact factor dilemma. Journal of Child Neurology 23 (2008) 365-367
3. Gersick J.G. Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal 31 (1988) 9-41
4. Gersick J.G. Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal 32 (1989) 274-309
5. Hambrick D.C. The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2007) 1346-1352
6. Kanfer R., and Ackerman P.L. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (1989) 657-690
7. Klein K.J., and Zedeck S. Theory in applied psychology: Lessons (re)learned. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004) 931-933
8. Kozlowski S.W.J., and Bell B.S. Work groups and teams in organizations. In: Borman W.C., Ilgen D.R., and Klimoski R.J. (Eds). Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology 12 (2003), Wiley, London 333-375
9. Kozlowski S.W.J., and Ilgen D.R. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7 (2006) 77-124
10. Kozlowski S.W.J., and Klein K.J. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: Klein K.J., and Kozlowski S.W.J. (Eds). Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (2000), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 3-90
11. Kraiger K., Ford J.K., and Salas E. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1993) 311-328
12. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff N.P., and Lee J. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 879-903
13. Rousseau D.M., Manning J., and Denyer D. Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals 2 (2008) 475-515
14. Sutton R.I., and Staw B.M. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1995) 371-384
15. Thompson J. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory (1967), McGraw-Hill, New York
16. Van de Ven A.H., Delbecq A.L., and Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41 (1976) 322-338
17. Van Iddekinge, C. H., Ferris, G. R., Perrewe, P. L., Perryman, A. A., Blass, F. R., & Heetderks, T. D. (in press). Effects of selection and training on unit-level performance over time: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology
18. Weick K.E. What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1995) 385-390