Concurrence between the maxillary midline and bisector to the interpupillary line

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 37-41

  Eskelsen, Evania ^a,b   Fernandes, Camila Borges ^b   Pelogia, Fernanda ^c   Cunha, Leonardo Gonçalves ^b   Pallos, Débora ^b   Neisser, Maximiliano Piero ^b   Liporoni, Priscila Christiane Suzy ^b  

^a University of Taubate ^*  (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TAUBATÉ   (Brazil)

^c SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL CARE; ESTHETICS; EYE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; MALE; MAXILLA; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; NOSE; PUPIL;

CEPHALOMETRY; ESTHETICS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; EYE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCISOR; MALE; MAXILLA; NOSE; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; PUPIL;

EID: 60249099362     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00229.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Masuoka N, Muramatsu A, Ariji Y, et al. Discriminative thresholds of cephalometric indexes in the subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007 131 : 609 13.
2. Cardash HS, Ormanier Z, Laufer BZ. Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines. J Prosthet Dent 2003 89 : 282 5.
3. Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984 51 : 24 8.
4. Naylor CK. Aesthetic treatment planning: The grid analysis system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002 2 : 76 84.
5. Faure JC, Rieffe C, Maltha JC. The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 2007 131 : 609 13.
6. Davis NC. Smile design. Dent Clin North Am 2007 51 : 299 318.
7. Gomes VL, Gonçalves LC, do Prado CJ, et al. Correlation between facial measurements and the mesiodistal width of the anterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006 18 : 196 205.
8. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness rating. Eur J Orthod 1999 21 : 517 22.
9. Pivnic EK, Rivas ML, Tolley EA, et al. Interpupillary distance in a normal black population. Clin Genet 1999 55 : 182 91.
10. Hasanreisoglu U, Semih B, Kerem A, et al. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: Facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 2005 94 : 530 8.
11. Golub J. Entire smile pivotal teeth to design. Clin Dent 1988 Suppl A : A33.
12. Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: Symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proc Biol Sci 1995 26 : 111 6.
13. Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod 1998 4 : 146 52.
14. Miller EL, Bodden WR, Jamison HC. A study of the dental midline to the facial median line. J Prosthet Dent 1979 41 : 657 60.
15. Gill DS, Naini FB, Tredwin CJ. Smile aesthetics. Dent Update 2007 34 : 152 8.
16. Springer IN, Wannicke B, Warnke PH, et al. Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg 2007 59 : 156 62.
17. Latta GH, Weaver JR, Conkin JE. The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupillary distance in edentulous pacients. J Prosthet Dent 1991 65 : 250 4.