The effect of government-sponsored R&D programmes on additionality in recipient firms in Taiwan

Technovation

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 204-217

  Hsu, Fang Ming ^a   Horng, Der Juinn ^b   Hsueh, Chao Chih ^b  

^a NATIONAL DONG HWA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Additionality; Evaluation; Government sponsored R D programme

Indexed keywords

ADDITIONALITY; EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS; EVALUATION; EVALUATION CRITERION; GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES; INDUSTRY SECTORS; PERFORMANCE PATTERNS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIC CHANGES; STRATEGY FORMULATIONS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

EID: 60249091613     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bach L., Conde-Molist M.J., Ledoux M.M., and Schaeffer V. Evaluation of the economic effects of BRITEEURAM programmes on the European industry. Scientometrics 34 3 (1995) 325-349
2. Buisseret T.J., Cameron H., and Georghiou L. What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management 10 4/5/6 (1995) 587-600
3. Chang P.C., Wang C.P., Yuan J.C., and Chuang K.T. Forecast of development trend in Taiwan's machinery industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 69 (2002) 781-802
4. Cordero R. The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: an overview. Research Policy 19 (1990) 185-192
5. Cozzarin B.P. Performance measures for the socio-economic impact of government spending on R&D. Scientometrics 68 1 (2006) 41-71
6. Czarnitzki D., and Licht G. Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy. Economics of Transition 14 1 (2006) 101-131
7. Davenport S., Grimes C., and Davies J. Research collaboration and behavioural additionality: a New Zealand case study. Technological Analysis and Strategic Management 10 1 (1998) 55-67
8. David P.A., Hall B.H., and Toole A.A. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29 4/5 (2000) 97-529
9. Ehlen, M., 1999. Economic impacts of flow-control machining technology: early applications in the automobile industry. NISTIR 6373, Gaithersburg, MD, October.
10. Flynn B., Sakakibara S., Schroeder R., Bates K., and Flynn E. Empirical research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management (1990) 250-284
11. Georghiou L. Impact of the Framework Programme on European Industry. EUR 15907 EN (1994), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
12. Georghiou L. Socio-economic effects of collaborative R&D-European experiences. Journal of Technology Transfer 24 1 (1999) 69
13. Georghiou L., and Roessner D. Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods. Research Policy 29 4/5 (2000) 657
14. Georghiou, L., Clarysse, B., Steurs, G., Bilsen, V., Larosse, J., 2004. Making the difference-the evaluation of behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies. IWT-STUDIES 48, June, pp. 7-20.
15. GIO, 2004. Taiwan Yearbook 2004. Available at 〈http://ecommerce.taipeitimes.com/yearbook2004/P321.htm〉. Government Information office, Taipei.
16. Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28 4 (1991) 1661-1707
17. Hayashi T. Bibliometric analysis on additionality of Japanese R&D programmes. Scientometrics 56 3 (2003) 301-316
18. Hsu C., and Chang H. The government strategy for the upgrading of industrial technology in Taiwan. Technovation 21 (2001) 123-132
19. Laidlaw, F.J., 1997. Acceleration of technology development by the Advanced Technology Program. National Institute of Standards and Technology Report NISTIR-6047, September.
20. Lee J.D., and Park C. Research and development linkages in a national innovation system: factors affecting success and failure in Korea. Technovation 26 (2006) 1045-1054
21. Luiten E., Lente H.V., and Blok K. Slow technologies and government intervention: energy efficiency in industrial process technologies. Technovation 26 (2006) 1029-1044
22. Luukkonen T. The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes. Research Policy 27 (1998) 599-610
23. Luukkonen T. Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy 29 (2000) 711-724
24. Martin, S.A., Winfield, D.L., Kenyon, A.E., Farris, J.R., Bala, M.V., Bingham, T.H., 1998. A framework for estimating the national economic benefits of ATP funding of medical Technologies. Research Triangle Institute, Center for Economic Research Raleigh, NC, GCR 97-797, April.
25. Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA), 2000. Machinery and Equipment Industry Promotion Office, Taipei. Internal document (in Chinese).
26. Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA). Introduction to Investment in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries in Taiwan, R.O.C. (2001), MOEA, Taipei
27. MOEA. Measuring ITDP Impact: 2007 Report on Economic Progress. Republic of China, 2007 (2007), MOEA, Taipei (in Chinese)
28. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2003. A toolkit for evaluation public R&D investment. NIST GCR 03-857.
29. National Science Council (NSC). Indicator of Science and Technology, Republic of China, 2000 (2002), National Science Council, Taipei
30. National Science Council (NSC). Indicator of Science and Technology, Taiwan, 2006 (2006), National Science Council, Taipei
31. OECD. Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour-Measuring Behavioural Additionality (2006), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
32. Pearce J.A., and Robinson R.B. Formulation and Implementation of Competitive Strategy (1998), Irwin, Boston
33. Punj G., and Stewart D.W. Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research 20 (1983) 134-148
34. Quintas P., and Guy K. Collaborative, pre-competitive R&D and the firm. Research Policy 24 (1995) 325-348
35. Roper S., Nola H.D., and Love J.H. An ex-ante evaluation framework for the regional benefits of publicly supported R&D projects. Research Policy 33 3 (2004) 487-509
36. Sakakibara M. Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?. Research Policy 26 4/5 (1997) 447
37. Sanz-Menendez L. Policy choices, institutional constraints and policy learning: the Spanish science and technology policy in the eighties. International Journal of Technology Management 10 4/5/6 (1995) 622-641
38. Strickland A.J., and Thompson A.A. Crafting and Implementing Strategy: Text and Readings (1998), Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA
39. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO), 2004. 2003 Annual Report, Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA), TIPO, Taipei, May (in Chinese).
40. Wade R. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (1990), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
41. Walwyn D. Finland and the mobile phone industry: a case study of the return on investment from government-funded research and development. Technovation 27 (2007) 335-341
42. Watanabe C., Tsuji Y.S., and Griffy-Brown C. Patent statistics: deciphering a 'real' versus a 'pseudo' proxy of innovation. Technovation 21 (2001) 783-790
43. Wonglimpiyarat J. The dynamic economic engine at silicon valley and US Government programmes in financing innovations. Technovation 26 (2006) 1081-1089