An analysis of the distribution and social antecedents of restrictive behavioural practices in a community day service for adults with intellectual disabilities

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 179-186

  Finn, Lori L ^a   Sturmey, Peter ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Day services; Dual diagnosis; Restraints; Restrictive procedures

Indexed keywords

EID: 60049093241     PISSN: 13602322     EISSN: 14683148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00486.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Belkin G. S. (2002) Emergency psychiatry: Self-restraint, self-examination: a historical perspective on restraints and ethics in psychiatry. Psychiatric Services 53, 663 664.
2. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (2008) State Operations Manual. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/downloads/som107c01.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2008).
3. Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (1997) 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq. Available at: http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/split/cripastat.htm (accessed on 11 April 2008).
4. Cunningham J., McDonald A., Easton S. Sturmey P. (2003) Social validation data on three methods of physical restraint: Views of consumers, staff and students. Research in Developmental Disabilities 24, 307 316.
5. Deutch A. (1946) The Mentally ill in America. Columbia University Press, New York.
6. Dix D. (1846) Memorial to the Legislation of the State of Massachusetts. Submitted by D. L. Dix, January, 1843.
7. Emerson E. (2002) The prevalence of use of reactive strategies in community-based services in the UK. In : Ethical approaches to physical interventions. Responding to challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities (ed D. Allen pp. 15 30. BILD Publications, Plymstock.
8. Feldman M. A., Atkininson L., Foti-Gervais L. Condillac R. (2003) Formal versus informal interventions for challenging behavior in persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research 48, 60 68.
9. General Accounting Office (1999) Report to Congressional Requesters. Mental Health. Improper use of Restraint or Seclusion Places People at Risk. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.
10. Healthcare Commission (2006) Joint Investigation Into the Provision of Services for People with Learning Disabilities at Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection. Available at: http://www.healthcarecommission.org.uk/-db/-documents/cornwall-investigation- report.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2008).
11. Luiselli J. K., Pace G. M. Dunn E. K. (2003) Antecedent analysis of therapeutic restraint in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury: A description of four cases. Brain Injury 17, 255 264.
12. Luiselli J. K., Dunn E. K. Pace G. M. (2005) Antecedent assessment and intervention to reduce physical restraint (protective holding) of children and adolescents with acquired brain injury. Behavioral Interventions 20, 51 65.
13. Lyon C. M. (1994) Legal Issues Arising from the Care and Control of Children with Learning Disabilities who Also Present Severe Challenging Behavior: A Guide for Parents and Carers. Mental Health Foundation, London.
14. Sturmey P. (1999) Correlates of restraint use in an institutional population. Research in Developmental Disabilities 20, 339 346.
15. US Department of Justice (2008) Available at: http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ split/mr.htm (accessed on 11 April 2008).
16. Van Houten R., Axelrod S., Bailey J. S., Favell J. E., Foxx R. M., Iwata B. A. Lovaas O. I. (1988) The right to effective behavioral treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 21, 381 384.