La cohabitation et le manage, deux mondes à part? Un examen des caractéristiques démographiques, individuelles et relationnelles

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 37-44

  Lachance Grzela, Myléne ^a   Bouchard, Geneviève ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONCTON   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cohabitation; Couple; Dyadic adjustment; Marriage; Personality

Indexed keywords

EID: 59949103976     PISSN: 0008400X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0013407     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Axinn, W. G. & Thornton, A. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence? Demography, 29, 357-374.
2. Baillargeon, J., Dubois, G. & Marineau, R. (1986). Traduction franaise de l'échelle d'ajustement dyadique. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 18, 25-34.
3. Baxter, J. (2005). To marry or not to marry: Marital status and the household division of labor. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 300-321.
4. Bé1anger, A. & Turcotte, P. (1999). L'influence des caractéristiques sociodémographiques sur le début de la vie conjugate des Québécoises. Cahiers Québécois de Démographie, 2 8, 173-197.
5. Booth, A. & Johnson, D. (1988). Premarital cohabitation and marital success. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 255-272.
6. Bouchard, G. (2005). Transition to motherhood and relationship quality: Does divorce or separation history matter? Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 107-117.
7. Bouchard, G., Boudreau, J. & Hébert, R. (2006). Transition to parenthood and conjugal life: Comparisons between planned and unplanned pregnancies. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1512-1531.
8. Bradbury, T. N. & Fincham, F. D. (1988). Individual difference variables in close relationships: A contextual model of marriage as an integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 713-721.
9. Brines, J. & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-355.
10. Brown, S. L. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 833-846.
11. Brown, S. L. & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 668-678.
12. Bumpass, L. L. & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29-41.
13. Bumpass, L. L. & Sweet, J. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 26, 615-625.
14. Casper, L. M. & Bianchi, S. M. (2001). Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
15. Casper, L. M. & Cohen, P. N. (2000). How does POSSLQ measure up? Historical estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 37, 237-245.
16. Charton, L. (1999). De l'union légalisée à la naissance 1égalisée : Évolution du lien entre marriage et premier enfant en Suisse. Cahiers Québécois de Démographic 28, 151-172.
17. Clackberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M. & Waite, L. J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609-634.
18. Clarkberg, M. (1999). The price of partnering: The role of economic well-being in young adults' first union experiences. Social Forces, 77, 945-968.
19. Cohan, K. L. & Kleinbaum, S. (2002). Toward a greater understanding of the cohabitation effect: Premarital cohabitation and marital communication. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 180-192.
20. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources.
21. Crohan, S. E. (1996). Marital quality and conflict across the transition to parenthood in African American and White couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 933-944.
22. Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage: The influence of gender ideology on housework allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1037-1061.
23. Feeney, J., Peterson, C. & Noller, P. (1994). Equity and marital satisfaction over the family life cycle. Personal Relationships, 1, 83-99.
24. Frick, R. W. (1995). Accepting the null hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 23, 132-138.
25. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall.
26. Hall, D. R. & Zhao, J. Z. (1995). Cohabitation and divorce in Canada: Testing the selectivity hypothesis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 421-428.
27. Karney, B. R. & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075-1092.
28. Karney, B. R. & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Contextual influences on marriage: Implication for policy and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 171-174.
29. Kashy, D. A. & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. Dans H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Éds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University.
30. Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294.
31. Kerr, D., Moyser, M. & Beaujot, R. (2006). Marriage and cohabitation: Demographic and socioeconomic differences in Quebec and Canada. Canadian Studies in Population, 33, 83-117.
32. Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15, 1-21.
33. Kiernan, K. (2004). Redrawing the boundaries of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 980-987.
34. Kline, G. H., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., Olmos-Gallo, P. A., St. Peters, M., Whitton, S. W., et al. (2004). Timing is everything: Preengagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 311-318.
35. Krishnan, V. (1998). Premarital cohabitation and marital disruption. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 28, 157-170.
36. Kurdek, L. A. (1990). Divorce history and self-reported psychological distress in husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 701-708.
37. Kurdek, L. A. (1999). The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality for husbands and wives over the first 10 years of marriage. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1283-1296.
38. Lapierre-Adamcyk, É. & Charvet, C. (1999). L'union libre et le mariage : Un bilan des travaux en demographic Cahiers Québé cois de Démographie, 28, 1-21.
39. Lapierre-Adamcyk, É., Le Bourdais, C. & Marcil-Gratton, N. (1999). Vivre en couple pour la première fois: La signification du choix de l'union libre au Québec et en Ontario. Cahiers Québé ecois de Démographic 28, 199-227.
40. Laplante, B. (2006). The rise of cohabitation in Quebec: Power of religion and power over religion. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 31, 1-24.
41. Le Bourdais, C. & Lapierre-Adamcyk, E. (2004). Changes in conjugal life in Canada: Is cohabitation progressively replacing marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 929-942.
42. Leridon, H. & Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1989). The new couples: Number, characteristics and attitudes. Population: An English Selection, 44, 203-235.
43. Malpas, N. (1999). Les couples européens : Qui sont-ils? Cahiers Québé- cois de Démographic 28, 117-149.
44. Manning, W. D. (2004). Children and the stability of cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 674-689.
45. Manning, W. D. & Smock, P. J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 989-1002.
46. McCrae, R. R. & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Special Issue: The five-factor model: Issues and applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
47. Milan, A. (2000). Les families: Cent ans de continuité et de changements. Tendances Sociales Canadiennes, 56, 2-15.
48. Milan, A. & Peters, A. (2003). Les couples qui vivent chacun chez soi. Tendances Sociales Canadiennes, 69, 2-7.
49. Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53-76.
50. Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M., Hunsberger, B. & Gallant, M. (2000). Thinking ahead: Complexity of expectations and the transition to parenthood. Journal of Personality, 68, 253-280.
51. Phillips, J. A. & Sweeney, M. M. (2005). Premarital cohabitation and marital disruption among White, Black, and Mexican American women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 296-314.
52. Sabourin, S. & Lussier, Y. (1992). Traduction franaise de l'inventaire de personnalité NEO-FFI. Manuscrit nonpublié.
53. Seltzer, J. A. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 921-928.
54. Skinner, K. B., Bahr, S. J., Crane, D. R. & Call, V. R. A. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, and remarriage: A comparison of relationship quality over time. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 74-90.
55. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20.
56. Smock, P. J. & Manning, W. D. (1997). Cohabiting partners' economic circumstances and marriage. Demography, 34, 331-341.
57. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
58. Statistique Canada (2002). Profil des families et des ménages canadiens: La diversification se poursuit (produit numéro 96F0030XIF2001003 au catalogue). Ottawa, Ontario: Auteur.
59. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G. & Hill, D. H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628-651.
60. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G. & Teachman, J. D. (1995). The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60, 762-774.
61. e Ed.). Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office.
62. U.S. Census Bureau (2003). Married-couple and unmarried partner households: 2000. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office.
63. Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Chen, M. D. & Campbell, A. M. (2005). As good as it gets? A life course perspective on marital quality. Social Forces, 493-511.
64. Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1990). Du mariage aux unions sans papiers : Histoire reéente des transformations conjugates. Population, 2, 265-298.
65. Wilhelm, B. (1998). Changes in cohabitation across cohorts: The influence of political activism. Social Forces, 77, 289-310.
66. Willets, M. C. (2006). Union quality comparisons between long-term heterosexual cohabitation and legal marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 110-127.
67. Woods, L. N. & Emery, R. E. (2002). The cohabitation effect on divorce: Causation or selection? Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 37, 101-119.
68. Wu, Z. & Balakrishnan, T. R. (1995). Dissolution of premarital cohabitation in Canada. Demography, 32, 521-532.