Evaluating the problem gambling severity index

Journal of Gambling Studies

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 105-120

  Holtgraves, Thomas ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment of problem gambling; Problem gambling; Problem Gambling Severity Index; South Oaks Gambling Screen

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CONCEPT; STANDARD;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CONCEPT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 59849127890     PISSN: 10505350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10899-008-9107-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. MW Abbott RA Volberg 1996 The New Zealand National Survey of problem and pathological gambling Journal of Gambling Studies 12 143 160 10.1007/BF01539171
2. MW Abbott RA Volberg 2006 The measurement of adult problem and pathological gambling International Gambling Studies 6 175 200 10.1080/14459790600928678
3. A Blaszczynski L Nower 2002 A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling Addiction 97 487 499
4. RP Culleton 1989 The prevalence rates of pathological gambling: A look at methods Journal of Gambling Behavior 5 22 41 10.1007/BF01022135
5. I Duvarci A Varan 2001 Reliability and validity study of the Turkish form of the South Oaks Gambling Screen Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 12 34 45
6. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
7. Ferris, J., Wynne, H., & Single, E. (1999). Measuring problem gambling in Canada: Final report-Phase I. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
8. MD Griffiths 1994 The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine playing The British Journal of Psychology 85 351 369
9. Ipsos-Reid Gemini & Research. (2003). British Columbia problem gambling prevalence study. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General.
10. NB Kuley DF Jacobs 1988 The relationship between dissociative-like experiences and sensation seeking among social and problem gamblers Journal of Gambling Behavior 4 197 207 10.1007/BF01018332
11. HR Lesieur SB Blume 1987 The South Oaks Gambling Screen (The SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers The American Journal of Psychiatry 144 1184 1188
12. HR Lesieur SB Blume 1993 Revising the South Oaks Gambling Screen in different settings Journal of Gambling Studies 9 213 223 10.1007/BF01015919
13. Market Quest Research Group Inc. (2005). Newfoundland and Labrador gambling prevalence study. Prepared for the Department of Health and Community Services. St. John's: Government of Newfoudnland and Labrador.
14. SM Moore K Ohtsuka 1999 Beliefs about control over gambling among young people, and their relation to problem gambling Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 13 339 347 10.1037/0893-164X.13.4.339
15. National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Oliveria, M. P. M. T., Silva, M. T. A., & da Silveira, D. X. (2002). Validity study of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) among distinct groups of Brazilian gamblers. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 24, 170-176. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria.
17. Patton, D., Brown, D., Dhaliwal, J., Pankratz, C., & Broszeit, B. (2002). Gambling involvement and problem gambling in Manitoba. Manitoba, Canada: Addictions Foundation of Manitoba.
18. HJ Shaffer MN Hall J Vander Bilt 1999 Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis American Journal of Public Health 89 1369 1376
19. Smith, G. J., & Wynne, J. H. (2002). Measuring gambling and problem gambling in Alberta using the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI): Final report. Edmonton: Alberta Gaming Research Institute.
20. R Stinchfield 2002 Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) Addictive Behaviors 27 1 19 10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00158-1
21. Stinchfield, R., Govoni, R., & Frisch, G. R. (2007). A review of screening and assessment instruments for problem and pathological gambling. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgins, & R. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 179-213). New York: Academic Press.
22. DL Streiner 2003 Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency Journal of Personality Assessment 80 99 103 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001-18
23. DR Strong RB Breen HR Lesieur CW Lejuez 2003 Using the Rasch model to evaluate the South Oaks Gambling Screen for use with nonpathological gamblers Addictive Behaviors 28 1465 1472 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00262-9
24. M Toce-Gerstein DR Gerstein RA Volberg 2003 A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community Addiction (Abingdon, England) 98 1661 1672 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00545.x
25. MB Walker MG Dickerson 1996 The prevalence of problem and pathological gambling: A critical analysis Journal of Gambling Studies 12 233 249 10.1007/BF01539176
26. GD Walters 1997 Problem gambling in a federal prison population: Results from the South Oaks Gambling screen Journal of Gambling Studies 13 7 24 10.1023/A:1024935115105
27. Wiebe, J., Mun, P., & Kauffman, N. (2006). Gambling and Problem Gambling in Ontario 2005. Responsible Gambling Council (Ontario): Toronto.
28. Wiebe, J., Single, E., & Falkowski-Ham, A. (2001). Measuring gambling and problem gambling in Ontario. Toronto: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse and Responsible Gambling.