Comparison of laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube for anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery

American Journal of Rhinology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 653-657

  Atef, Ahmed Mohamed ^a   Fawaz, Ahmed ^b  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b AIN SHAMS UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; Endotracheal intubation; Functional endoscopic sinus surgery; I.v. anesthesia; Intraoperative bleeding; Laryngeal mask; Sinusitis; Total i.v.

Indexed keywords

ATRACURIUM; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLEEDING; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG INFUSION; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDUCED HYPOTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; LOW DRUG DOSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOSE SURGERY; PARANASAL SINUS DISEASE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BLOOD PRESSURE; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION, CONTROLLED; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; PARANASAL SINUSES; PIPERIDINES; PROPOFOL; SINUSITIS;

EID: 59849109668     PISSN: 10506586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3247     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Stammberger H. Anatomic and pathophysiological concepts. In Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Philadelphia: BC Decker, 321-333, 1991.
2. Lindop MJ. Complications and morbidity of controlled hypotension. Br J Anesth 47:799-803, 1975.
3. Hogue CW Jr, Bowdle TA, O'Leary C, et al. A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 3:279-285, 1996.
4. Philip BK, Scuderi PE, Chung F, et al. Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using total intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg 4:515-521, 1997.
5. Guy J, Hindman BJ, Baker KZ, et al. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions. Anesthesiology 6:514-554, 1997.
6. Degoute CS, Ray MJ, Manchon M, et al. Remifentanil and controlled hypotension; comparison with nitroprusside or esmolol during tympanoplasty. Can J Anesth 8:20-22, 2001
7. Degoute CS, Ray MJ, Gueugniaud PY, et al. Remifentanil induces consistent and sustained controlled hypotension in children during middle ear surgery. Can J Anesth 50:270-276, 2003.
8. Rathjen T, Bockmühl U, and Greim CA. Modern anesthesiologic concepts supporting paranasal sinus surgery. Laryngorhinootologie 85:20-23, 2006.
9. Williams PJ, Thompsett C, and Bailey PM. Comparison of the reinforced laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation for nasal surgery. Anesthesia 50:987-989, 1995.
10. Webster AC, Morley-Forster PK, Janzen V, et al. Anesthesia for Intranasal Surgery: A comparison between tracheal intubation and the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 88:421-423, 1999.
11. Ahmed MZ, and Vohra A. The reinforced laryngeal mask airway (RLMA) protects the airway in patients undergoing nasal surgery - An observational study of 200 patients. Can J Anesth 49:863-866, 2002.
12. Kaplan A, Crosby GJ, and Bhattacharyya N. Airway protection and the laryngeal mask airway in sinus and nasal surgery. Laryngoscope 114:652-655, 2004.
13. Wilson IG, Fell D, Robinson SL, et al. Cardiovascular responses to insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anesthesia 47: 300-302, 1992.
14. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, and Toyooka H. Circulatory responses to laryngeal mask airway insertion or tracheal intubation in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Can J Anaesth 42: 32-36, 1995.
15. Brain AIJ, Denman WT, and Goudsouzian NG. Laryngeal Mask Airway Instructional Manual. San Diego, CA: Gensia, Inc., 1995.
16. Fromme GA, Mackenzie RA, Gould AB Jr, et al. Controlled hypotension for orthognathic surgery. Anesth Analg 65:683-686, 1986.
17. Simpson P. Perioperative blood loss and its reduction: The role of the anesthetist. Br J Anesth 69:498-507, 1992.
18. Schüttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H, et al. A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anesthesia 52:307-317, 1997.
19. Baker KZ, Ostapkovich N, Sisti MB, et al. Intact cerebral blood flow reactivity during remifentanil/nitrous oxide anesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 9:134-140, 1997.
20. Barak M, Ziser A, Greenberg A, et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine response to tracheal intubation: Direct laryngoscopy compared with fiberoptic intubation. J Clin Anesth 15:132-136, 2003.
21. Brodrick PM, Webster NR, and Nunn JF. The laryngeal mask airway: A study of 100 patients during spontaneous breathing. Anesthesia 44:238-241, 1989.
22. Maltby JR, Loken RG, and Watson NC. The laryngeal mask airway: Clinical appraisal in 250 patients. Can J Anesth 37:509-513, 1990.
23. Alexander CA. A modified Intavent laryngeal mask for ENT and dental anesthesia. Anesthesia 45:892-893, 1990.
24. Hickey S, Cameron AE, and Asbury AJ. Cardiovascular response to insertion of Brain's laryngeal mask. Anesthesia 45:629-633, 1990.
25. Oczenski W, Krenn H, Dahaba AA, et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to insertion of the Combitube, laryngeal mask airway or tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 88:1389-1394, 1999.
26. Braude N, Clements EAF, Hodges UM, et al. The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison with tracheal intubation. Anesthesia 44:551-554, 1989.