Perception of consent among house surgeons: Differences between Pakistan and United Kingdom Hospitals

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 789-790

  Samad, Abdul ^a,b   Khanzada, Tariq Wahab ^a   Kumar, Basant ^a   Rajput, Akram ^a  

^a ISRA UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

^b NONE   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HERNIOPLASTY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LARYNGEAL NERVE; MALE; NERVE INJURY; PAKISTAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGEON; SURGICAL RISK; THYROIDECTOMY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; GENERAL SURGERY; GREAT BRITAIN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PAKISTAN;

EID: 59849093673     PISSN: 1022386X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Simon RI. Informed consent: maintaining a clinical perspective. In: Clinical psychiatry and the law. 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press 1992: 121-53.
2. Jafarey AM. Informed consent in research and clinical situations. J Pak Med Assoc 2003; 53:171-2.
3. Ryan C. Consenting adults. BMA News Rev 1998; 24:29.
4. Huntley JS, Anakwe R, Findlay I. Informed consent and the JHO in Scotland. Int J Clin Pract 2004; 58:550-3.
5. Huntley JS, Shields DA, Stallworthy NK. Consent obtained by the junior house officer - is it informed? J R Soc Med 1998; 91: 528-30.