A new methodology approach for measuring corporate social responsibility performance

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus

Volumn 9, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 129-138

  Panayiotou, Nikolaos A ^a   Aravossis, Konstantin G ^a   Moschou, Peggy ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); GRI; Performance measurement; Qualitative and quantitative evaluation process

Indexed keywords

CORPORATE STRATEGY; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL INDICATOR;

EURASIA; EUROPE; GREECE; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 59849091991     PISSN: 15677230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11267-008-9204-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Aravossis, K., Panayiotou, N., & Tsousi, K. (2006). A proposed methodological framework for the evaluation of corporate social responsibility. In K. Aravossis, C. A. Brebbia, E. Kakaras, & A. G. Kungolos (Eds.), Environmental economics and investment assessment (pp. 87-95). Shouthampton, Boston: WIT Press.
2. Boatright, J. R. (2003). Ethics and the conduct of business, (4th ed.). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
3. Brown, C. S. (2005). The sustainable enterprise: Profiting from best practice. London: Kogan Page.
4. Buchholz, R. A. (1990). Essentials of public policy for management, (2nd ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Business for Social Responsibility Education Fund (2000). Corporate social responsibility: A guide to better business practices (p. 179). San Francisco: Business for Socially Responsible Education Fund.
6. Business Intelligence Survey (1998). Strategic performance measurement and management survey. Retrieved June 10, 2001, from http://www.bscol.com.
7. P. Castka C. J. Bamber D. J. Bamber J. M. Sharp 2004 Integrating corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into ISO Management Systems-In Search of a Feasible CSR Management System Framework The TQM Magazine 16 3 216 224
8. EFQM (1999). The EFQM Excellence Model, European Foundation for Quality Management, Brussels, available at: www.efqm.org.
9. Epstein, M. J. (1999). Counting what counts: Turning corporate accountability to competitive advantage. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
10. Epstein, M., & Wisner, P. (2001). Good neighbours: implementing social and environmental strategies with the BSC, Balanced Scorecard Report, May-June, Vol.3, No 3. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Publishing.
11. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Shaltegger, S., Wagner, M. (2001). The sustainability balanced scorecard-A tool for value-oriented sustainability management in strategy-focused organisation, (Paper presented at the 7th Eco-Management and Auditing Conference, Nijmegen, Netherlands), June.
12. Fojt, M. (2008). Case studies in CSR: How to move from gloss to strategy. Strategic Direction, 24(1), 12-14, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
13. P. G. Frankental 2001 Corporate social responsibility Corporate Communications 6 1 18 24
14. GRI (2002). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Global Reporting Initiative, available at: www.globalreporting.org.
15. S. Johnson 1998 Application of the balanced scorecard approach Corporate Environmental Strategy 5 4 35 41
16. R. Kaplan D. Norton 1992 The balanced scorecard-Measures that drive performance Harvard Business Review 70 1 71 79
17. Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
18. G. P. G. Lantos 2001 The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility Journal of Consumer Marketing 18 7 595 630
19. McIntosh, M. R., Leipziger, T. D., & Coleman, G. (2003). Living corporate citizenship. Strategic routes to socially responsible business. London: Prentice-Hall.
20. A. [tmp] McWilliams D. S. Siegel P. M. Wright 2006 Introduction-Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications Journal of Management Studies 26 1 1 18
21. NIST 2002 Malcolm baldrige national quality award criteria US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Science and Technology Gaithersburg, MD: US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Science and Technology available at: www.quality.nist.gov.
22. Panayiotou, N., Aravossis, K., & Moschou, P. (2008). Contents of corporate social responsibility reports of companies in Greece: A comparative study. In S. O. Idowu & W. L. Filho (Eds.), Global Practices of Corporate Responsibility. Berlin: Springer.
23. I. Papasolomou-Doukakis M. Krambia-Kaprdis M. Katsioloudes 2005 Corporate social responsibility: The way forward? Maybe not! A preliminary study in Cyprus European Business Review 17 3 263 279
24. M. E. Porter M. R. Kramer 2006 Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility Harvard Business Review 84 12 78 79
25. PriceWaterhouseCoopers Management Barometer (2002). Business Performance Measures are Top Information Priority for Executives of Multinationals in Europe and US, 12 September 2002, available at: http://www.barometersurveys.com/ production/BarSurv.nsf/vwResources/PR-PDF-Files-2002/file/mg020912.pdf.
26. V. Pryce 2002 CSR-should it be the preserve of the usual suspects Business Ethics: A European Review 11 2 140 142
27. Radcliffe, M. (1999). Using the balanced scorecard to develop metrics for sustainable development. Chapel Hill: Greening of Industry Network.
28. Robbins, S., & Decenzo, D. (2001). Fundamentals of management, (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. A. Stainer L. Stainer 2003 Editorial: Business performance and corporate social responsibility International Journal of Business Performance Management 5 2/3 107 108
30. M. Van Marrewiijk 2003 Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion Journal of Business Ethics 44 2/3 95 105
31. Webley, S. (2001). Business ethics: A European review. London: Blackwell.