Zinc rejection from leachate solutions of industrial solid waste - effects of pressure and concentration on nanofiltration membrane performance

Desalination

Volumn 239, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 58-65

  Belkhouche, Nasr Eddine ^a   Didi, Mohamed Amine ^a   Taha, Samir ^b   Farès, Naïma Ben ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY HOUARI BOUMEDIENE   (Algeria)

^b INSTITUT DES SCIENCES CHIMIQUES DE RENNES   (France)

Author keywords

Charged membrane; Medium composition; Nanofiltration; Zinc leachate solution

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT; IONIC STRENGTH; LEACHATE TREATMENT; METAL IONS; METALS; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; SOLID SOLUTIONS; SOLID WASTES; WATER FILTRATION; ZINC;

CHARGED MEMBRANES; CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUMS; EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS; INDUSTRIAL SOLID WASTES; MEDIUM COMPOSITION; SOLUTION CONCENTRATION; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; ZINC LEACHATE SOLUTION;

INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT;

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FILTRATION; LEACHATE; MEMBRANE; RETENTION; SOLID WASTE; WATER TREATMENT; ZINC;

EID: 59849086667     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hartinger L. Handbook of Effluents Treatment and Recycling for the Metal Finishing Industry. 2nd ed. (1994), Finishing Publications 5
2. Belkhouche N., Didi M.A., Romero R., Jönsson J.A., and Villemin D. Study of new organophosphorus derivates carriers on the selective recovery of M (II) and M (III) metals, using supported liquid membrane extraction. J. Membr. Sci. 284 (2006) 398-405
3. Sekkat N., Guerbet M., and Jouany J.M. A comparison of toxicity detection in urban and industrial waste leachates by eight short-term bioassays. Rev. Sci. Eau. 14 1 (2001) 63-72
4. González-Muñoz M.J., Rodríguez M.A., Luque S., and Álvarez J.R. Recovery of heavy metals from metal industry waste waters by chemical precipitation and nanofiltration. Desalination 200 (2006) 742-744
5. Muthukrishnan M., and Guha B.K. Heavy metal separation by using surface modified nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 200 (2006) 351-353
6. Gega J., Walkowiak W., and Gajda B. Separation of Co(II) and Ni(II) ions by supported and hybrid liquid membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 551-558
7. Ho W.S.W., Poddar T.K., and Neumuller T.E. Removal and recovery of copper and zinc by supported liquid membranes with strip dispersion. J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng. 33 (2002) 67-76
8. Ballet G.T., Hafiane A., and Dhahbi M. Influence of operating conditions on the retention of phosphate in water by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 290 (2007) 164-172
9. Tanninen J., Mänttäri M., and Nyström M. Effect of salt mixture concentration on fractionation with NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 283 (2006) 57-64
10. Wang D.-X., Wang X.-L., Tomi Y., Ando M., and Shintani T. Modeling the separation performance of nanofiltration membranes for the mixed salts solution. J. Membr. Sci. 280 (2006) 734-743
11. Bowen W.R., Cassey B., Jones P., and Oatley D.L. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-application to an industrially relevant separation. J. Membr. Sci. 242 (2004) 211-220
12. Chaabane T., Taha S., Taleb Ahmed M., Maachi R., and Dorange G. Removal of copper from industrial effluent using a spiral wound module-film theory and hydrodynamic approach. Desalination 200 (2006) 403-405
13. Hussain A.A., Abashar M.E.E., and Al-Mutaz I.S. Influence of ion size on the prediction of nanofiltration membrane systems. Desalination 214 (2007) 150-166
14. Artu G., and Hapke J. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes by their morphology, charge and filtration performance parameters. Desalination 200 (2006) 178-180
15. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., and Nyström M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 265 (2005) 160-166
16. Garcia-Aleman J., and Dickson J.M. Mathematical modeling of nanofiltration membranes with mixed electrolyte solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 235 (2004) 1-13
17. Skluzacek J.M., Tejedor M.I., and Anderson M.A. NaCl rejection by an inorganic nanofiltration membrane in relation to its central pore potential. J. Membr. Sci. 289 (2007) 32-39
18. Fatin-Rouge N., Szymczyk A., Ozdemir E., Vidonne A., and Fievet P. Retention of single and mixed inorganic electrolytes by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 200 (2006) 133-134
19. Frarès N.B., Taha S., and Dorange G. Influence of the operating conditions on the elimination of zinc ions by nanofiltration. Desalination 185 (2005) 245-253
20. Pereira A.M., Rooze J., Timmer M., and Keurentjes J. An analysis of multi-component mass transfer in solvent nanofiltration. Desalination 199 (2006) 37-38
21. Chaabane T., Taha S., Ahmed M.T., Maachi R., and Dorange G. Retention modelling of the bivalent cations in crossflow nanofiltration investigation in the porous models. Desalination 204 (2007) 359-367
22. Garba Y., Taha S., Gondrexon N., and Dorange G. Ion transport modelling through nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 160 (1999) 187-200
23. Ahmed M.T., Taha S., Maachi R., and Dorange G. The influence of physico-chemistry on the retention of chromium ions during nanofiltration. Desalination 145 (2002) 103-108
24. Benko K., Pellegrino J., Mason L.W., and Price K. Measurement of water permeation kinetics across reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes: Apparatus development. J. Membr. Sci. 270 (2006) 187-195
25. Pontié M., Lhassani A., Diawara C.K., Elana A., Innocent C., Aureaua D., Rumeau M., Croue J.P., Buisson H., and Hemery P. Seawater nanofiltration for the elaboration of usable salty waters. Desalination 167 (2004) 347-355
26. Paugam L., Taha S., Carbon J., Gondrexon N., and Dorange G. Nanofiltration of ammonium nitrate solutions. Study of influent parameters. Rev. Sci. Eau. 14 4 (2001) 511-523
27. Szymczyk A., Fievet P., and Ramseyer C. Dielectric constant of electrolyte solutions confined in a charged nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 200 (2006) 125-126
28. Ahn K.H., Song K.G., Cha H.Y., and Yeom I.T. Removal of ions in nickel electroplating rinse water using low-pressure nanofiltration. Desalination 122 (1999) 77-84
29. 4 across an amphoteric nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 179 (2000) 137-154
30. Schaep J., Vandescasteele C., Mohammad A.W., and Bowen W.R. Modelling the retention of ionic components for different nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22 23 (2001) 169-179