The effects of complex stapes motion on the response of the Cochlea

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1187-1192

  Huber, Alexander M ^a   Sequeira, Damien ^a   Breuninger, Christian ^b   Eiber, Albrecht ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory mechanics; Cochlear mechanics; Cochlear physiology; Middle ear mechanics; Stapes

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; FEMALE; GUINEA PIG; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; STAPES; STIMULATION; VIBRATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; COCHLEA; FEMALE; GUINEA PIGS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; STAPES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; VIBRATION;

EID: 59849083248     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817ef49b     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Voss S, Rosowski J, Peake W. Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100:1602-16.
2. Dallos P. The Auditory Periphery: Biophysics and Physiology. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1973.
3. Asai M, Huber A, Goode R. Analysis of the best site on the stapes footplate for ossicular chain reconstruction. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1999;119:356-61.
4. Hato N, Stenfelt S, Goode RL Three-dimensional stapes footplate motion in human temporal bones. Audiol Neurootol 2003;8:140-52.
5. Stenfelt S, Goode RL Transmission properties of bone conducted sound: measurements in cadaver heads. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;118:2373-91.
6. Voss S, Rosowsky J, Merchant S., et al. Acoustic responses of the human middle ear. Hear Res 2000;150:43-69.
7. Huber A, Linder T, Ferrazzini M., et al. Intraoperative assessment of stapes movement. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001;110:31-5.
8. Eiber A. Mechanical modeling and dynamical behavior of the human middle ear. Audiol Neurootol 1999;4:170-7.