Evaluating the effectiveness of a patient-oriented hand rehabilitation programme

Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 771-778

  Harth, Angela ^a   Germann, G ^a   Jester, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

DASH questionnaire; Hand rehabilitation; Patient orientation; Quality of care

Indexed keywords

ABSENTEEISM; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; FEMALE; FINGER INJURY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GERMANY; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND INJURY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOB PERFORMANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PINCH STRENGTH; RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION CARE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 36; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; WORK RESUMPTION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; GERMANY; HAND INJURIES; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 59749101038     PISSN: 17531934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1753193408091602     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bullinger, M, and I Kirchberger (1998). SF-36 Health survey manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
2. Dern, W, and G Rass (2002). Gender and status specific predictors and their influence on return to work, Ulm, Rehabilitation Sciences Colloquium..
3. Donabedian, A (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association, 260, 1743-1748.
4. Faller, H (2003). Shared decision making: An approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 42, 129-135.
5. Gage, M, and H Polatajko (1995). Naming practice: The case for the term client-driven. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 115-118.
6. German Federal ConstitutionSocial statute book 9 - Rehabilitation and participation of persons with disabilities.. Ratified in Bonn, 2001 (Online Document http://www.bundestag.de (accessed 27.10.02)).
7. Germann, G, A Harth, G Wind, and E Demir (2003). Standardisation and validation of the German version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaire, Unfallchirurg, 106, 13-9.
8. Hermann, C, U Buss, and R Snaith (1995). HADS-D - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, German version. In. Bern, Huber. Test documentation and manual.
9. Jester, A, A Harth, and G Germann (2005). Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH questionnaire. Journal of Hand Surgery A, 30, 1074-1082.
10. (1998). Client-centred occupational therapy. In Law, M and J Mills (Eds.) Law, M (Ed.), Client-centred occupational therapy (pp. 9-18). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK.
11. Lohaus, A, and H Schmitt (1989). Questionnaire to health-related locus of control. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
12. Reimann, AAims of the SGB 9 and its influence on rehabilitation.. Rehabilitation Science Colloquium, DRV-Publications, 2002 (No. 33, S. 2).
13. Rogers, C (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Mifflin.
14. Schmidt, J, F Lamprecht, and W Wittmann (1998). German version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire - CSQ 8. In S Biefang, P Potthoff and F Schleihe (Eds.), Assessment in rehabilitation (pp. 65-66). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
15. Simon, D, G Schorr, and M Wirtz (2006). Development and first validation of the shared-decision making questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Education and Counselling, 2652, 1-9.
16. Steinke, B, and W Heine (2002). SGB 9-Magna Carta of a functional participation philosophy. Rehabilitation, 5, 343-347.
17. World Health Organisation (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. In. Geneva.