Determination of field-independent and field-dependent components of anisotropy of susceptibility through standard AMS measurement in variable low fields II: An example from the ultramafic body and host granulitic rocks at Bory in the Moldanubian Zone of Western Moravia, Czech Republic

Tectonophysics

Volumn 466, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 123-134

  Hrouda, František ^a,b   Faryad, Shah Wali ^b   Chlupáčová, Marta ^a   Jeřábek, Petr ^b   Kratinová, Zuzana ^b,c  

^a Advanced Geoscience Instruments Company   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility; Fabric relationship; Host granulite; Separation of AMS components; Ultramafic body

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY OF MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; FABRIC RELATIONSHIP; HOST GRANULITE; SEPARATION OF AMS COMPONENTS; ULTRAMAFIC BODY;

ALPHA PARTICLE SPECTROMETERS; ANISOTROPY; ASSET MANAGEMENT; FABRICS; GARNETS; IRON ORES; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC MATERIALS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETITE; MINERALOGY; MINERALS; OXIDE MINERALS; PARAMAGNETIC MATERIALS; PARTICLE SPECTROMETERS; SEPARATION; SILICA; SILICATE MINERALS; SULFIDE MINERALS;

MAGNETIC PROPERTIES;

GRANULITE; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC FABRIC; MAGNETIC MINERAL; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETITE; ULTRAMAFIC ROCK;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE; MORAVIA;

EID: 59749086591     PISSN: 00401951     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aydin A., Ferré E.C., and Aslan Z. The magnetic susceptibility of granitic rocks as a proxy for geochemical differentiation: Example from the Saruhan granitoids, NE Turkey. Tectonophysics 441 (2007) 85-95
2. Bouchez J.-L. Anisotropie de susceptibilité magnétique et fabrique des granites. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris. Sciences de la Terre et des planetes 330 (2000) 1-14
3. Collinson D.W. Methods in Rock Magnetism and Palaeomagnetism. Techniques and Instrumentation (1983), Chapman & Hall, London - New York
4. In: Dallmeyer R.D., Franke W., and Weber K. (Eds). Pre-Permian Geology of Central and Eastern Europe (1995), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1-593
5. Ferré E.C., Martín-Hernández F., Teyssier Ch., and Jackson M. Paramagnetic and ferromagnetic anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in migmatites: measurements in high and low fields and kinematic implications. Geophys. J. Int. 157 (2004) 1119-1129
6. Franěk J., Schulmann K., and Lexa O. Kinematic and rheological model of exhumation of high pressure granulites in the Variscan orogenic root: example of the Blanský les granulite, Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic. Mineral. Petrol. 86 (2006) 253-276
7. Franke W. The middle-European segment of the Variscides: tectonostratigraphic units, terrane boundaries and plate tectonic evolution. In: Franke W., Haak U., Oncken O., and Tanner D. (Eds). Orogenic Processes: Quantification and Modelling in the Variscan belt. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. vol. 179 (2000) 35-61
8. Friedrich D., Hrouda F., and Chlupáčová M. Relationship between paramagnetic and ferrimagnetic anisotropies in selected specimens of the KTB pilot borehole and its vicinity (German part of the Bohemian massif). Sci. Drill. 5 (1995) 3-15
9. Hrouda F. The effect of quartz on the magnetic anisotropy of quartzite. Stud. Geophys. Geod. 30 (1986) 39-45
10. Hrouda F. A technique for the measurement of thermal changes of magnetic susceptibility of weakly magnetic rocks by the CS-2 apparatus and KLY-2 Kappabridge. Geophys. J. Int. 118 (1994) 604-612
11. Hrouda F. Low-field variation of magnetic susceptibility and its effect on the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of rocks. Geophys. J. Int. 150 (2002) 715-723
12. Hrouda, F., 2004. Problems in interpreting AMS parameters in diamagnetic rocks, 49-59. Magnetic Fabric: Methods and Applications, F. Martín-Hernández, C.M. Lüneburg, C. Aubourg & M. Jackson (eds), Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 238.
13. Hrouda F. Determination of field-independent and field-dependent components of anisotropy of susceptibility through standard AMS measurement in variable low fields I: Theory. Tectonophysics 466 (2009) 114-122 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.026
14. Hrouda F., and Jelínek V. Resolution of ferromagnetic and paramagnetic anisotropies, using combined low-field and high-field measurements. Geophys. J. 103 (1990) 75-84
15. Hrouda F., and Kahan Š. The magnetic fabric relationship between sedimentary and basement nappes in the High Tatra Mts. (N Slovakia). J. Struct. Geol. 13 (1991) 431-442
16. Hrouda F., Janák F., Rejl L., and Weiss J. The use of magnetic susceptibility anisotropy for estimating the ferromagnetic mineral fabrics of metamorphic rocks. Geol. Rdsch. 60 (1971) 1124-1142
17. Hrouda F., Pokorny J., Suza P., Pokorny P., Hirt A., and Tiefenauer L. Scope and examples of rock magnetic investigations in weak magnetic fields using Multi-Function Kappabridge set. EOS Trans. AGU, Fall Meeting 2005 (2005)
18. Hrouda F., Chlupáčová M., and Mrázová Š. Low-field variation of magnetic susceptibility as a tool for magnetic mineralogy of rocks. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 154 (2006) 323-336
19. Jackson M. Anisotropy of magnetic remanence: a brief review of mineralogical sources, physical origins, and geological applications, and comparison with susceptibility anisotropy. PAGEOPH 136 (1991) 1-28
20. Jackson M., Moskowitz B., Rosenbaum J., and Kissel C. Field-dependence of AC susceptibility in titanomagnetites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 157 (1998) 129-139
21. Jelínek V. Statistical processing of magnetic susceptibility measured on groups of specimens. Studia Geophys. Geod. 22 (1978) 50-62
22. Jelínek V. Characterization of magnetic fabric of rocks. Tectonophysics 79 (1981) T63-T67
23. Jelinek V. Theory and measurement of the anisotropy of isothermal remanent magnetization of rocks. Trav. Geophys. 37 (1993) 124-134
24. Martín-Hernández F., and Hirt A.M. Separation of ferrimagnetic and paramagnetic anisotropies using a high-field torsion magnetometer. Tectonophysics 337 3-4 (2001) 209-221
25. Martín-Hernández F., and Hirt A.M. The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in biotite, muscovite and chlorite single crystals. Tectonophysics 367 (2003) 13-28
26. Martín-Hernández F., and Hirt A.M. A method for the separation of paramagnetic, ferrimagnetic and haematite magnetic sufabrics using high-field torque magnetometry. Geophys. J. Int. 157 (2004) 117-127
27. Medaris Jr. G., Wang H., Jelínek E., Mihaljevič M., and Jakeš P. Characteristics and origins of diverse Variscan peridotites in the Gföhl Nappe, Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic. Lithos 82 (2005) 1-23
28. Mísař Z., and Jelínek E. Inclusions of peridotites, pyroxenites, eclogites and opals in the leptynites of the Moldanubicum at the locality Bory (SW Moravia) (in Czech). Věst. Ústř. Úst. Geol. 56 (1981) 13-21
29. Nagata T. Rock magnetism (1961), Maruzen Tokyo
30. Pokorný, J., Suza, P., Hrouda, F., 2004. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of rocks measured in variable weak magnetic fields using the KLY-4S Kappabridge, 69-76. Magnetic Fabric: Methods and Applications, F. Martín-Hernández, C.M. Lüneburg, C. Aubourg & M. Jackson (eds), Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 238.
31. Owens W.H., and Bamford D. Magnetic, seismic, and other anisotropic properties of rock fabric. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A 283 (1976) 55-68
32. Richter C., and van der Pluijm B. Separation of paramagnetic and ferrimagnetic susceptibilities using low temperature magnetic susceptibilities and comparison with high field methods. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 82 (1994) 113-123
33. Rochette P., and Fillion G. Identification of multicomponent anisotropies in rocks using various field and temperature values in a cryogenic magnetometer. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 51 (1988) 379-386
34. Rochette P., Jackson J., and Aubourg C. Rock magnetism and the interpretation of anisotrophy of magnetic susceptibility. Rev. Geophys. 30 (1992) 209-226
35. Sander, B., 1948. Einführung in die Gefügekunde der geologischen Körper. Wien.
36. Schulmann K., Schaltegger U., Ježek J., Thompson A.B., and Edel J.-B. Rapid burial and exhumation during orogeny: Thickening and synconvergent exhumation of thermally weakened and thinned crust (Variscan orogen in Western Europe). Am. J. Sci. 302 (2002) 856-879
37. Schwarz E.J. Magnetic properties of pyrrhotite and their use in applied geology and geophysics. Geol. Surv. Canada Paper 74-59 (1975) 24 pp.
38. Stephenson A., Sadikun S., and Potter D.K. A theoretical and experimental comparison of the anisotropies of magnetic susceptibility and remanence in rocks and minerals. Geophys. J.R. astron. Soc. 84 (1986) 185-200
39. Tajčmanová L., Konopásek J., and Schulmann K. Thermal evolution of the orogenic lower crust during exhumation within a thickened Moldanubian root of the Variscan belt of Central Europe. J. Metamorph. Geol. 24 (2006) 119-134
40. Turner F.J. Metamorphic Petrology (1968), McGraw Hill, New York 403 pp.
41. Worm H.-U. Multidomain susceptibility and anomalously strong low field dependence of induced magnetization in pyrrhotite. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 69 (1991) 112-118
42. Worm H.-U., Clark D., and Dekkers M.J. Magnetic susceptibility of pyrrhotite: grain size, field and frequency dependence. Geophys. J. Int. 114 (1993) 127-137
43. Zapletal K. The mean susceptibility and magnetic anisotropy of biotites (in Czech). In: Zapletal K. (Ed). The use of magnetic properties of rocks in ore and oil geophysics, unpublished report of Geofyzika n.p. (1985), Brno 54-75