|
Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 337-338
|
Pressure to perform: Is cardiac output estimation from arterial waveforms good enough for routine use?
a b |
Author keywords
Cardiac output; Comparison of cardiac output methods; Pulse contour; Signal quality; Thermodilution
|
Indexed keywords
VASOACTIVE AGENT;
VASODILATOR AGENT;
ARTERIAL PRESSURE;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT;
CIRCULATION;
CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT;
EDITORIAL;
HEART OUTPUT;
HEART PERFUSION;
HEART STROKE VOLUME;
HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING;
HUMAN;
INTENSIVE CARE;
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT;
MEDICAL PERSONNEL;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER;
PULSE PRESSURE;
SHOCK;
WAVEFORM;
HEART FUNCTION TEST;
NOTE;
PHYSIOLOGY;
STANDARD;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
CARDIAC OUTPUT;
HEART FUNCTION TESTS;
HUMANS;
|
EID: 59649129889
PISSN: 00903493
EISSN: 15300293
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181935189 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (8)
|