Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance

Journal of Research in Music Education

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 470-479

  Wapnick, Joel ^a   Darrow, Alice Ann ^b   Kovacs, Jolan ^a   Dalrymple, Lucinda ^a,c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59649128445     PISSN: 00224294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3345540     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, R., & Nida, S. A. (1978). Effect of physical attractiveness on opposite and same-sex evaluation. Journal of Personality, 46, 401-413.
2. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 7 (pp. 157-215). New York: Academic Press.
3. Byrne, D., London, O., & Reeves, K. (1968). The effects of physical attractiveness, sex and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 36, 259-271.
4. Clifford, M., & Walster, E. (1973). The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectation. Sociology of Education, 46, 248-258.
5. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
6. Ekholm, E. (1994). The effect of guided listening on evaluation of solo vocal performance. Master's thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.
7. Elliott, C. (1994, July). Race and gender as factors in judgments of musical performance. Paper presented at the ISME Fifteenth International Research Seminar, Miami, FL.
8. Fiske, H. E. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 186-196.
9. Fiske, H. E. (1977a). Who's to judge? New insights into performance evaluation. Music Educators Journal, 64(4), Dec., 23-25.
10. Fiske, H. E. (1977b). Relationship of selected factors in trumpet performance adjudication reliability. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 256-263.
11. Holahan, C., & Stephan, C. (1981). When beauty isn't talent: The influence of physical attractiveness, attitudes toward women, and competence on impression formation. Sex Roles, 7(8), 867-876.
12. Kaplan, R. (1978). Is beauty talent? Sex interaction in the attractiveness halo effect. Sex Roles, 4(2), 195-204.
13. Kehle, T., Bramble, W., & Mason, F. (1974). Teachers' expectations: Rating of student performance as biased by student characteristics. Journal of Experimental Education, 43, 54-60.
14. Killian, J. (1990). Effect of model characteristics on musical preference of junior high students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 115-123.
15. Landy, D., & Sigall, H. (1974). Beauty is talent: Task evaluations as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 299-304.
16. LeBlanc, A. (1979). Generic style music preferences of fifth-grade students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 255-270.
17. LeBlanc, A., & Sherrill, C. (1986). Effect of vocal vibrato and performer's sex on children's music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 222-237.
18. McCrary, J. (1993). Effects of listeners' and performers' race on music preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 200-211.
19. Stephan, C., & Langlois, J. (1984). Baby beautiful: Adult attributions of infant competence as a function of infant attractiveness. Child Development, 55(2), 576-585.
20. Tripp, R. T. (Ed.). (1970). International thesaurus of quotations. New York: Harper and Row.
21. Vasil, T. (1973). The effects of systematically varying selected factors on music performing adjudication. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
22. Wapnick, J., & Ekholm, E. (in press). Expert consensus in solo vocal performance evaluation. Journal of Voice.
23. Wapnick, J., Flowers, P., Alegant, M., & Jasinskas, L. (1993). Consistency in piano performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 282-292.