An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part II: Women's satisfaction

Women and Birth

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 11-16

  Fereday, Jennifer ^b   Collins, Carmel ^c   Turnbull, Deborah ^a   Pincombe, Jan ^d   Oster, Candice ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c CHILD HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Continuity of care; Demonstration study; Maternal satisfaction; Midwifery; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SERVICE; MIDWIFE; OPEN ENDED QUESTIONNAIRE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

AUSTRALIA; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FEMALE; GROUP PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MIDWIFERY; MODELS, NURSING; MOTHERS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRENATAL CARE;

EID: 59649118045     PISSN: 18715192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2008.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Redshaw M. Women as consumers of maternity care: measuring 'satisfaction' or 'dissatisfaction'. Birth 35 1 (2008) 73-76
2. Goodman P., Mackey M.C., and Tavakoli A.S. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing 46 2 (2004) 212-219
3. Harvey S., Rach D., Stainton M.C., Jarrell J., and Brant R. Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. Midwifery 18 (2002) 260-267
4. Devane D., Megley C.M., Clarke M., Horey D., and O'Boyle C. Evaluating maternity care: a core set of outcome measures. Birth 34 2 (2007) 164-172
5. Brown S., and Lumley J. Changing childbirth: lessons from an Australian survey of 1336 women. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 105 (1998) 143-155
6. Williamson S., and Thomson A.M. Women's satisfaction with antenatal care in a changing maternity service. Midwifery 12 (1996) 198-204
7. Omar M.A., and Schiffman R.F. Pregnant women's perceptions of prenatal care. American Journal of Maternal and Child Nursing 23 (1995) 132-142
8. Waldentrom U., Brown S., McLachlan H., Forster D., and Brennecke S. Does team midwife care increase satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care? A randomized controlled trial. Birth 27 (2000) 156-167
9. Shields N., Turnbull D., Reid M., Holmes A., McGinley M., and Smith L.N. Satisfaction with midwife-managed care in different time periods: a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women. Midwifery 14 2 (1998) 85-93
10. Farquhar M., Camilleri-Ferrante C., and Todd C. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme. Midwifery 16 (2000) 35-47
11. Green J.M., Renfrew M.J., and Curtis P.A. Continuity of carer: what matters to women? A review of the evidence. Midwifery 16 (2000) 186-196
12. Turnbull D., Holmes A., Shields N., Cheyne H., Twaddle S., Gilmour W.H., et al. Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care. Lancet 348 9022 (1996) 213-218
13. Shields N., Holmes A., Cheyne H., McGinley M., Young D., Gilmour W.H., et al. Knowing your midwife during labour. British Journal of Midwifery 7 8 (1999) 504-510
14. Biro M.A., Waldenstrom U., Brown S., and Pannifex J.H. Satisfaction with Team Midwifery Care for low- and high-risk women: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 30 1 (2003) 1-10
15. Brown S., and Lumley J. The 1993 survey of recent mothers: issues in survey design, analysis and influencing policy. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 9 4 (1997) 265-275
16. Graneheim U., and Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24 (2004) 105-112
17. Bryman A. Social research methods. 2nd Ed. (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford
18. NVivo qualitative data analysis software Version 2.0. QSR International Pty Ltd., 2002.
19. McCourt C., Page L., Hewison J., and Vail A. Evaluation of one-to-one midwifery: women's responses to care. Birth 25 2 (1998) 73-80
20. Reed B. The Albany midwifery practice (2). MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 12 2 (2002) 261-264
21. McCourt C., and Stevens T. Continuity of carer: what does it mean and does it matter to midwives and birthing women?. Canadian Journal of Midwifery Research and Practice 4 3 (2005-2006) 10-20