A novel method for extracting DNA from chorionic villus samples for use in CVS-PCR, which ensures complete villus dissociation

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 113-119

  Holgado, Elaine ^a   Holgado, Ben ^a   Liddle, Stuart ^a   Ballard, Terry ^a   Levett, Lisa ^a  

^a TDL Genetics   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CVS; Dna extraction; Mosaicism; Placental mosaicism; Prenatal diagnosis; Quantitative fluorescent pcr

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTROPHOBLAST; DNA EXTRACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KARYOTYPE; MESENCHYME CELL; MOSAICISM; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CHORIONIC VILLI; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; DNA; FEMALE; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREGNANCY; TRISOMY;

EID: 59649111577     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2160     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Allen SK, Luharia A, Gould CP, MacDonald F, Larkins S, Davison EV. 2006. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common trisomies: discordant results between QF-PCR analysis and karyotype analysis on long-term culture for a case of trisomy 18 detected in CVS. Prenat Diagn 26: 1160-1167.
2. Cirigliano V, Ejarque M, Canadas MP, et al. 2001. Clinical application of multiplex quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) for the rapid prenatal detection of common chromosome aneuploidies. Mol Hum Reprod 7: 1001-1006.
3. CMGS Best Practice Guidelines for QF-PCR for the diagnosis of ane-uploidy. 2004. http://cmgs.org/BPG/Guidelines/2004/QFPCR.htm.
4. CMGS Best Practice Guidelines for QF-PCR for the diagnosis of aneuploidy. 2007. http://cmgsweb.shared.hosting.zen.co.uk/BPGs/pdfs%20Dec%2007/QFPCR.pdf.
5. Donaghue C, Mann K, Docherty Z, Mackie Ogilvie C. 2005. Detection of mosaicism for primary trisomies in prenatal samples by QF-PCR and karyotype analysis. Prenat Diagn 25: 65-72.
6. Levett LJ, Liddle S, Meredith R. 2001. A large-scale evaluation of amnio-PCR for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17: 115-118.
7. Mann K, Fox SP, Abbs SJ, et al. 2001. Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 358: 1057-1061.
8. Pertl B, Kopp S, Kroisel P, Tului L, Brambati B, Adonolfi M. 1999. Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies by quantitative fluorescence PCR: first application on 247 chorionic villus samples. JMed Genet 36: 300-303.
9. Rooney DE (ed.). 2001. Human Cytogenetics: A Practical Approach: Constitutional Analysis (3Rev edn). Oxford University Press: New York.
10. Waters J, Mann K, Grimsley L, et al. 2007. Complete discrepancy between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVS. Prenat Diagn 27: 332-339.
11. Waters J, Mann K, Ogilvie C. 2008. UK audit of biallelic abnormal PCR results in CVS Presentation at ACC/CMGS Spring meeting.
12. Waters J, Walsh S, Levett L, Liddle S, Akinfenwa Y. 2006. Complete discrepancy between abnormal fetal karyotypes predicted by QF-PCR rapid testing and karyotyped cultured cells in a first-trimester CVS. Prenat Diagn 26: 892-897.