Is getting a conservation model used more important than getting it accurate?

Biological Conservation

Volumn 142, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 699-700

  Hajkowicz, Stefan ^a   Higgins, Andrew ^a   Miller, Craig ^a   Marinoni, Oswald ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59649089300     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.023     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Hajkowicz S.A., Higgins A., Williams K., Faith D.P., and Burton M. Optimisation and the selection of conservation contracts. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 51 (2007) 39-56
2. Hajkowicz S., Higgins A., Miller C., and Marinoni O. Targeting conservation payments to achieve multiple outcomes. Biological Conservation 141 (2008) 2368-2375
3. Marinoni O., Higgins A., Hajkowicz S., and Collins K. The multiple criteria analysis tool (MCAT): a new software tool to support environmental investment decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software 24 2 (2009) 153-164
4. O'Hanley J.R. Using the right tool to get the job done - recommendations on the use of exact and heuristics methods for solving resource allocation problems in environmental planning and management. Letter to the Editor. Biological Conservation 141 4 (2008) 697-698
5. Tukey J.W. The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33 1 (1962) 1-67