The Relationship between Transliminality and Boundary Structure Subscales

Imagination, Cognition and Personality

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 369-378

  Sherwood, Simon J ^a   Milner, Maxine E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59549100243     PISSN: 02762366     EISSN: 15414477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/1YH2-51J5-TG3E-UTFU     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Milner M., Establishing a Relationship Between Transliminality and Boundary Structure Theories, by Correlating Scores from the Transliminality Scale and Sub-Scales from the Boundary Structure Questionnaire, unpublished BSc dissertation, University College Northampton, England, 2001.
2. Thalbourne M. A., Transliminality: A Review, International Journal of Parapsychology, XI, pp. 1–34, 2001.
3. Thalbourne M. A., Transliminality: Further Correlates and a Short Measure, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 92, pp. 402–419, 1998.
4. Hartmann E., Boundaries in the Mind: A New Psychology of Personality, Basic Books, New York, 1991.
5. Houran J. Thalbourne M. A. Hartmann E., Comparison of Two Alternative Measures of the Boundary Construct, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, pp. 311–323, 2003.
6. Krippner S. Wickramasekera I. Wickramasekera J. Winstead C. W. III, The Ramtha Phenomenon: Psychological, Phenomenological, and Geomagnetic Data, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 92, pp. 1–24, 1998.
7. Hartmann E. Harrison R. Zborowski M., Boundaries in the Mind: Past Research and Future Directions, North American Journal of Psychology, 3, pp. 347–368, 2001.
8. Thalbourne M. A. Delin P. S., A Common Thread Underlying Belief in the Paranormal, Creative Personality, Mystical Experience and Psychopathology, Journal of Parapsychology, 58, pp. 3–38, 1994.
9. Lange R. Thalbourne M. A. Houran J. Storm L., The Revised Transliminality Scale: Reliability and Validity Data from a Rasch Top-Down Purification Procedure, Consciousness and Cognition, 9, pp. 591–617, 2000.
10. Hartmann E. Rosen R. Rand W., Personality and Dreaming: Boundary Structure and Dream Content, Dreaming, 8, pp. 31–39, 1998.
11. Thalbourne M. A. Bartemucci L. Delin P. S. Fox B. Nofi O., Transliminality: Its Nature and Correlates, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 91, pp. 305–331, 1997.
12. Thalbourne M. A. Houran J., Transliminality, the Mental Experience Inventory, and Tolerance for Ambiguity, Personality and Individual Differences, 28, pp. 853–863, 2000.
13. Wilson S. C. Barber T. X., The Fantasy-Prone Personality: Implications for Understanding Imagery, Hypnosis, and Parapsychological Phenomena, PSI Research, 1, pp. 94–116, 1982.
14. Wilson S. C. Barber T. X., The Fantasy-Prone Personality: Implications for Understanding Imagery, Hypnosis, and Parapsychological Phenomena, in Imagery: Current Theory, Research, and Application, Sheikh A. A. (ed.), John Wiley & Son, New York, 1983.
15. Tellegen A. Atkinson G., Openness to Absorbing and Self-Altering Experiences (“Absorption”), a Trait Related to Hypnotic Susceptibility, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, pp. 268–277, 1974.
16. Cowen D. Levin R., The Use of the Hartmann Boundary Questionnaire with an Adolescent Population, Dreaming, 5, pp. 105–114, 1995.
17. Hicks R. A. Bautista J. Hicks G. J., Boundaries and Level of Experience with Six Types of Dreams, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, pp. 760–762, 1999.
18. Kunzendorf R. G. Hartmann E. Cohen R. Cutler J., Bizarreness of the Dreams and Daydreams Reported by Individuals with Thin and Thick Boundaries, Dreaming, 7, pp. 265–271, 1997.
19. Schredl M. Schaefer G. Hofmann F. Jacob S., Dream Content and Personality: Thick vs. Thin Boundaries, Dreaming, 9, pp. 257–263, 1999.
20. Thalbourne M. A. Delin P. S., Transliminality: Its Relation to Dream Life, Religiosity and Mystical Experience, International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, pp. 45–61, 1999.
21. Houran J. Thalbourne M. A., Further Study and Speculation on the Psychology of “Entity Encounter Experiences,” Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 65, pp. 26–37, 2001.
22. Houran J. Thalbourne M. A., Theoretical Refinements on Entity Encounter Experiences and Transliminality, Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 65, pp. 241–256, 2001.
23. Kottmeyer M., Abduction: The Boundary Deficit Hypothesis, Magonia, 37, pp. 3–7, 1988.
24. Richards D. G., Boundaries in the Mind and Subjective Interpersonal Psi, Journal of Parapsychology, 60, pp. 227–240, 1996.
25. Storm L. Thalbourne M. A., The Transliminal Connection Between Paranormal Effects and Personality in an Experiment with the I Ching, European Journal of Parapsychology, 14, pp. 100–124, 1998–1999.
26. Storm L. Thalbourne M. A., Studies of the I Ching: I. A Replication, Journal of Parapsychology, 65, pp. 105–123, 2001.
27. Storm L. Thalbourne M. A., Studies of the I Ching: II. Additional Analyses, Journal of Parapsychology, 65, pp. 291–309, 2001.
28. Thalbourne M. A., Personality Characteristics of Students Who Believe Themselves to Be Psychic, Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 63, pp. 203–212, 1999.
29. Thalbourne M. A., Measures of the Sheep-Goat Variable, Transliminality, and Their Correlates, Psychological Reports, 88, pp. 339–350, 2001.
30. Thalbourne M. A., Transliminality and Creativity, Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, pp. 193–202, 2000.
31. Werner H., Comparative Psychology of Mental Development, International Universities Press, New York, 1948.
32. Sherwood S. J., Relationship Between the Hypnagogic/Hypnopompic States and Reports of Anomalous Experiences, Journal of Parapsychology, 66, pp. 127–150, 2002.