Interaction goals and message production: Conceptual and methodological developments

Communication and Social Cognition: Theories and Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 71-95

  Wilson, Steven R ^a   Feng, Hairong ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59549085839     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936313     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 338-375.
2. Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Troetschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014-1027.
3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-289). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Burleson, B. R. (1987). Cognitive complexity. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 305-349). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
6. Cai, D., & Wilson, S. R. (2000). Identity implications of influence goals: Across-cultural comparison of interaction goals and facework. Communication Studies, 51, 307-328.
7. Cody, M. J., Canary, D. J., & Smith, S. W. (1994). Compliance-gaining goals: An inductive analysis of actors' goal types, strategies, and successes. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 33-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2004). The dark side of relationship pursuit: From attraction to obsession and stalking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Dillard, J. P. (1989). Types of influence goals in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 293-308.
10. Dillard, J. P. (1990). A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence. In J. P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 41-56). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
11. Dillard, J. P. (2004). The goals-plans-action model of interpersonal influence. In J. S. Seiter & R. H. Gass (Eds.), Perspectives on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 185-206). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56, 19-38.
13. Ellis, D. G. (1999). From language to communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Feng, H., & Wilson, S. R. (2004). A critical review of the primary/secondary goal framework. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
15. Fitch, K. L. (1994). Across-cultural study of directive sequences and some implications for compliance-gaining research. Communication Monographs, 61, 185-209.
16. Gastil, J. (1995). Anappraisal and revision of the constructivist research program. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 18 (pp. 83-104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
18. Goldsmith, D. J., & Fitch, K. (1997). The normative context of advice as social support. Human Communication Research, 23, 454-476.
19. Greene, J. O. (1995). Production of messages in pursuit of multiple goals: Action assembly theory contributions to the study of cognitive encoding processes. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 18 (pp. 26-53). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
20. Greene, J. O. (2000). Evanescent mentation: An ameliorative conceptual foundation for research and theory on message production. Communication Theory, 10, 139-155.
21. Hample, D., & Dallinger, J. M. (1987). Individual differences in cognitive editing standards. Human Communication Research, 14, 123-144.
22. Honeycutt, J. M., Cantrill, J. G., Kelly, P., & Lambkin, D. (1998). How do I love thee? Let me consider my options: Cognition, verbal strategies, and the escalation of intimacy. Human Communication Research, 25, 39-63.
23. Hullett, C. R. (2004). Atest of the initial processes of the goal-plans-action model of interpersonal influence. Communication Studies, 55, 286-299.
24. Jennings, N., & Wartella, E. (2004). Technology and the family. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 593-608). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Kellermann, K. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59, 288-300.
26. Kellermann, K. (2004). A goal-directed approach to compliance-gaining: Relating differences among goals to differences in behaviors. Communication Research, 31, 397-445.
27. Kellermann, K., & Cole, T. (1994). Classifying compliance-gaining messages: Taxonomic disorder and strategic confusion. Communication Theory, 4, 3-60.
28. Kellermann, K., & Park, H. S. (2001). Situational urgency and conversational retreat:When politeness and efficiency matter. Communication Research, 28, 3-47.
29. Kim, M. S., & Wilson, S. R. (1994). Across-cultural comparison of implicit theories of requesting. Communication Monographs, 61, 210-235.
30. Kim, M. S., Wilson, S. R., Anastasio, L., Aleman, C. G., & Oetzel, J. (2003, June). The relationship between self construals, perceived face threats, and facework during the pursuit of influence goals. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Seoul, South Korea.
31. Kipnis, D., Schmidt, D., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics:Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.
32. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2004). Communication in intact families. In A. Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 177-196). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. Kunkel, A. D., Wilson, S. R., Olufowote, J., & Robson, S. (2003). Identity implications of influence goals: Initiating, intensifying, and ending romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 382-412.
34. Kunkel, A. D., Wilson, S. R., Robson, S., Olufowote, J., & Soliz, J. (2004). Changes of heart from start to part: Identity implications of (re)negotiating romantic relationships. Manuscript under review.
35. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic.
36. Lambert, B. L. (1996). Face and politeness in pharmacist-physician interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 43, 1189-1198.
37. Lannamann, J. W. (1991). Interpersonal communication as ideological practice. Communication Theory, 1, 179-203.
38. Lannutti, P. J., & Monahan, J. L. (2004). Resistance, persistence, and drinking: Examining goals of women's refusals of unwanted sexual advances. Western Journal of Communication, 68, 151-169.
39. MacGeorge, E. L. (2001). Support providers' interaction goals: The influence of attributions and emotions. Communication Monographs, 68, 72-97.
40. Meyer, J. R. (2003). Cognitive representations of request situations: The relative importance of specificity and situation features. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 292-317.
41. Meyer, J. R. (2004). Effect of verbal aggressiveness on the perceived importance of secondary goals in messages. Communication Studies, 55, 168-184.
42. Miller, G. R., Boster, F. J., Roloff, M. E., & Seibold, D. (1977). Compliance-gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44, 37-51.
43. Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, M. (1978). Persuasion research: Review and commentary. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2 (pp. 29-47). New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction.
44. Miller, M. A., Alberts, J. K., Hecht, M. L., Trost, M. R., & Krisek, R. L. (2000). Adolescent relationships and drug use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
45. Morgan, M., & Hummert, M. L. (2000). Perceptions of communicative control strategies in mother-child dyads across the lifespan. Journal of Communication, 50, 48-64.
46. Motley, M. T. (1986). Consciousness and intentionality in communication:Apreliminary model and methodological approaches. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 50, 3-23.
47. O'Keefe, B. J. (1988). Thelogic ofmessage design. Communication Monographs, 55, 80-103.
48. O'Keefe, B. J., & Delia, J. G. (1982). Impression formation and message production. In M. E. Roloff & C. R. Berger (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 33-72). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49. O'Keefe, B. J., & Shepherd, G. J. (1987). The pursuit of multiple objectives in face-to-face persuasive interaction: Effects of construct differentiation on message organization. Communication Monographs, 54, 396-419.
50. Oldershaw, L., Walters, G. C., & Hall, D. K. (1986). Control strategies and noncompliance in abusive mother-child dyads: An observational study. Child Development, 57, 722-732.
51. Olufowote, J. O., Miller, V. D., & Wilson, S. R. (2005). The interactive effects of role change goals and relational changes on employee upward influence tactics. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 385-403.
52. Rule, B. G., & Bisanz, G. L. (1985). Anatomy of a persuasion schema: Targets, goals, and strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1127-1140.
53. Sabee, C. M., & Wilson, S. R. (2005). Students' primary goals, attributions, and facework during conversations about disappointing grades. Communication Education, 54, 185-204.
54. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
55. Searle, J. R. (1976). Aclassification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1-25.
56. Seibold, D. R., Cantrill, J. G., & Meyers, R. A. (1994). Communication and interpersonal influence. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 542-588). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Shah, J. (2003). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 661-681.
58. Shepherd, G. J. (1998). The trouble with goals. Communication Studies, 49, 294-299.
59. Sillars, A., Roberts, L. J., Leonard, K. E., & Dun, T. (2000). Cognition during marital conflict: The relationship of thought and talk. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 479-502.
60. Simpson, J. A., Orina, M. M., & Ickes, W. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 881-893.
61. Tracy, K., Craig, R. T., Smith, M., & Spisak, F. (1984). The discourse of requests: Assessment of a compliance-gaining approach. Human Communication Research, 10, 513-538.
62. Waldron, V. R. (1997). Toward a theory of interactive conversational planning. In J. O. Greene (Eds.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 195-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
63. Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. Wilson, E. V., & Zigurs, I. (2001). Interpersonal influence goals and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 11, 59-76.
65. Wilson, S. R. (1990). Development and test of a cognitive rules model of interaction goals. Communication Monographs, 57, 81-103.
66. Wilson, S. R. (1995). Elaborating the cognitive rules model of interaction goals: The problem of accounting for individual differences in goal formation. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 18 (pp. 3-25). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
67. Wilson, S. R. (2000). Developing planning perspectives to explain parent-child interactions in physically abusive families. Communication Theory, 10, 210-220.
68. Wilson, S. R. (2002). Seeking and resisting compliance: Why people say what they do when trying to influence others. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69. Wilson, S. R., Aleman, C. G., & Leatham, G. B. (1998). Identity implications of influence goals:Arevised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 25, 64-96.
70. Wilson, S. R., Anastasiou, L., Aleman, C. G., Kim, M. S., & Oetzel, J. O. (2000, June). Identity implications of influence goals: Ethnicity and face work. Presentation at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
71. Wilson, S. R., Kim, M. S., & Meischke, H. (2001/2002). Evaluating Brown and Levinson's politeness theory: Arevised analysis of directives and face. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 215-252.
72. Wilson, S. R., & Kunkel, A. K. (2000). Identity implications of influence goals: Similarities in face threats and facework across sex and close relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 195-221.
73. Wilson, S. R., & Morgan, W. M. (in press). Goals-plans-action (GPA) theory: Theories of goals, plans, and planning processes in families. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Family communication theories. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Wilson, S. R., & Sabee, C. M. (2003). Explicating communicative competence as a theoretical term. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 3-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
75. Yukl, G., Guinan, P. J., & Sottolano, D. (1995). Influence tactics used for different objectives with subordinates, peers, and superiors. Group & Organizational Management, 20, 272-296.