Current utilization of breast FNA in a cytology practice

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 140-142

  Simsir, Aylin ^a,b   Rapkiewicz, Amy ^a   Cangiarella, Joan ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Fine needle aspiration; Review

Indexed keywords

ASPIRATION BIOPSY; ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHORT SURVEY;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 59449109800     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20987     Document Type: Short Survey

References (23)

1. Sanchez MA, Stahl RE. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the breast. Obsolete or state of the art. Cancer 2008;114:65-66.
2. Manfrin E, Mariotto R, Remo A, et al. Is there still a role for fine-needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer screening? Experience with real-time integrated radiopathologic activity (1999-2004). Cancer (Cytopathol) 2008;114:74-82.
3. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J, et al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 study. The RDOG5 investigators. Cancer 1998;82:679-688.
4. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Caudry DJ, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: Results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology 2001;219:785-792.
5. Tabbara SO, Frost AR, Stoler MH, Sneige N, Sidawy MK. Changing trends in breast fine needle aspiration: results of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Survey. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;22:126-130.
6. Chhieng D, Fernandez G, Cangiarella JF, et al. Invasive carcinoma in clinically suspicious breast masses diagnosed as adenocarcinoma by fine-needle aspiration. Cancer 2000;90:96-101.
7. Rutstein LA, Johnson RR, Poller WR, et al. Predictors of residual invasive disease after core needle biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 2007;13:251-257.
8. Berner A, Davidson B, Sigstad E, Risberg B. Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs. core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:344-348.
9. Hwang S, Ioffe O, Lee I, Waisman J, Cangiarella J, Simsir A. Cytologic diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma: Factors associated with negative and equivocal diagnoses. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31:87-93.
10. Ballo MS, Sniege N. Can core needle biopsy replace fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma. A comparative study of 124 women. Cancer 1996;78:773-777.
11. Florentine BD, Cobb CJ, Frankel K, Greaves T, Martin SE. Core needle biopsy. A useful adjunct to fine needle aspiration in select patients with palpable breast lesions. Cancer 1997;81:33-39.
12. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:341-346.
13. Helbich TH, Rudas M, Haitel A, et al. Evaluation of needle size for breast biopsy: comparison of 14-, 16- and 18-gauge biopsy needles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:59-63.
14. Westenend PJ, Sever AR, Beekman-de Volder HJC, Liem SJ. A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the evaluation of breastlesions. Cancer(CancerCytopathol) 2001;93:146-150.
15. Leifland K, Lagerstedt U, Svane G. Comparison of stereotactic fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in 522 non-palpable breast lesions. Acta Radiol 2003;44:387-391.
16. Leifland K, Lundquist H, Lagerstedt U, Svane G. Comparison of preoperative simultaneous stereotactic fine needle aspiration biopsy and stereotactic core needle biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Acta Radiol 2003;44:213-217.
17. Leifland K, Lundquist H, Mare K, Erhardt K, Fernstad R. Pre-oper-ative simulataneous stereotactic core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma. Acta Radiol 2000;41:57-60.
18. Masood S, Loya A, Khalbuss W. Is core needle biopsy superior to fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions? Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28:329-334.
19. de Almeida Barra A, Gobbi H, Alencar de L, et al. A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy according to tumor size of suspicious breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:26-31.
20. Mathur SR, Karak K, Verma K. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: A potential diagnostic pitfall on fine needle aspiration cytology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2004;47:243-245.
21. Zhang C, Quddus MR, Sung CJ. Atypical adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: Diagnostic problems and practical approaches in core needle biopsy. Breast J 2004;20:154-155.
22. NIH. The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. NIH Consensus Development Conference. Am J Surg 1997;174: 371-375.
23. Sun W, Li A, Abreo F, Turbat-Herrera E, Grafton WD. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy for diagnosis of breast cancer. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;24:421-425.