Binding equilibria between β-cyclodextrin and p-nitro-aniline derivatives: the first systematic study in mixed water-methanol solvent systems

Tetrahedron

Volumn 65, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2037-2042

  Lo Meo, Paolo ^a   D'Anna, Francesca ^a   Riela, Serena ^a   Gruttadauria, Michelangelo ^a   Noto, Renato ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 NITROANILINE; ANILINE DERIVATIVE; BETA CYCLODEXTRIN; METHANOL; SOLVENT; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATION; ENERGY; ENTHALPY; ENTROPY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULE; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLVENT EFFECT;

EID: 59449093667     PISSN: 00404020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2009.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Matsui Y., and Mochida K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 52 (1979) 2808-2814
2. Rekharsky M.V., Mayhew M.P., Goldberg R.N., Ross P.D., Yamashoji Y., and Inoue Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997) 87-100
3. Wedig M., Laug S., Christians T., Thunhorst M., and Holzgrabe U. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 27 (2000) 531-540
4. Lo Meo P., D'Anna F., Riela S., Gruttadauria M., and Noto R. Tetrahedron 58 (2002) 6039-6045
5. Lo Meo P., D'Anna F., Riela S., Gruttadauria M., and Noto R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 1 (2003) 1584-1590
6. Tabushi I., Kiyosuke Y., Sugimoto T., and Yamamura K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100 (1978) 916-919
7. Liu L., and Guo Q.-X. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 42 (2002) 1-14
8. Lo Meo P., D'Anna F., Gruttadauria M., Riela S., and Noto R. Tetrahedron 60 (2004) 9099-9111
9. Szejtli J. Chem. Rev. 98 (1998) 1743-1753
10. Todorova N.A., and Schwarz F.P. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 39 (2007) 1038-1048
11. Olivera A., Pérez-Casas S., and Costas M. J. Phys. Chem. B 111 (2007) 11497-11505
12. Inoue Y., and Hakushi T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (1985) 935-946
13. Inoue Y., Liu Y., Tong L.-H., Shen B.-J., and Jin D.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 10637-10644
14. Liu L., and Guo Q.-X. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 42 (2002) 1-14
15. Linert W., Han L.-F., and Lukovits I. Chem. Phys. 139 (1989) 441-455
16. Rekharsky M.V., and Inoue Y. Chem. Rev. 98 (1998) 1875-1917
17. Liu L., and Guo Q.-X. Chem. Rev. 101 (2001) 673-695
18. Grunwald E., and Steel C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 5687-5692
19. Dodziuk H. J. Mol. Struct. 614 (2002) 33-45
20. Lipkowitz H.B. J. Org. Chem. 56 (1991) 6357-6367
21. Kozár T., and Venanzi C.A. J. Mol. Struc. (Theochem) 395-396 (1997) 451-468
22. Mayer B., Marconi G., Klein C., Kohler G., and Wolschann P. J. Incl. Phenom. Mol. Recl. Chem. 29 (1997) 79-93 and references therein
23. Raffaini G., and Ganazzoli F. Chem. Phys. 333 (2007) 128-134
24. Rees D.A. J. Chem. Soc. B (1970) 877-884
25. Rekharsky M.V., Yamamura H., Kawai M., and Inoue I. J. Org. Chem. 68 (2003) 5228-5235
26. Nishio H., Hirota M., and Umezawa Y. The CH-π Interaction: Evidence, Nature and Consequences (1998), Wiley-VHC, New York, NY
27. Ribeiro J.P., Bacchi S., Dell'Anna G., Morando M., Cañada F.J., Cozzi F., and Jiménez-Barbero J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2008) 5891-5898
28. Porras S.P., Sarmini K., Fanali S., and Kenndler E. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003) 1645-1651
29. Castronuovo G., Elia V., Niccoli M., and Vellica F. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 45 (2003) 91-97
30. Schuette J.M., Ndou T.T., Muñoz de la Peña A., Mukundan Jr. S., and Warner I.M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 292-298
31. Mrozek J., Guzov K., Szabelsky M., Karolkzac J., and Wiczk W. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 153 (2002) 121-128
32. Smidtchen F.P. Chem.-Eur. J. 8 (2002) 3522-3529
33. Chervenak M.C., and Toone E.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 (1994) 10533-10539
34. Lo Meo P., D'Anna F., Riela S., Gruttadauria M., and Noto R. Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 9099-9102
35. Lo Meo P., D'Anna F., Riela S., Gruttadauria M., and Noto R. Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 9163-9171
36. D'Anna F., Lo Meo P., Riela S., Gruttadauria M., and Noto R. Tetrahedron 57 (2001) 6823-6827
37. For a thorough discussion on how the structural features of the guests influence the trends of the inclusion constants, see. Lo Meo P., D'Anna F., Riela S., Gruttadauria M., and Noto R. Tetrahedron 58 (2002) 6039-6045 also Refs. 1e,4
38. MeOH (referred to pure water) is given by the coefficient of the first-order term.
39. It is interesting to notice that all the substrates belonging to the first subset possess a poorly hydrophobic, conformationally flexible ancillary chain able to donate/accept two hydrogen bonds simultaneously. On the other hand, the substrates belonging to the second subset have ancillary chains unable to form multiple hydrogen bonds for various reasons: 4 and 5 possess only one donor/acceptor site, whereas the ammonium cationic head group of 6-8, presumably, is too strongly solvated. Moreover, the occurrence of particularly effective hydrophobic interactions between the CD cavity the ancillary chains of 7 and 8 is likely.
40. Kauzmann W.J., Walter J.E., and Eyring H. Chem. Rev. 26 (1940) 339-407 and references therein
41. Concentrative Properties of Aqueous Solutions: Density, Refractive Index, Freezing Point Depression and Viscosity. In: Lide D.R. (Ed). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 88th ed. (2008), CRC/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL (Internet Version)
42. Yang H., and Bohne C. J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 14533-14539
43. D'Anna F., Riela S., Lo Meo P., Gruttadauria M., and Noto R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 13 (2002) 1755-1760
44. D'Anna F., Riela S., Lo Meo P., and Noto R. Tetrahedron 60 (2004) 5309-5314
45. Of course, the binding equilibrium is per se a dynamic process. Therefore, it is implicit that the solvent swap process is 'fast' in the lifetime scale of the inclusion complex.