Challenges of designing the next generation of America's schools

Phi Delta Kappan

Volumn 79, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 688-693

  Duke, Daniel L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5944259248     PISSN: 00317217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Credit for the idea of an environmental impact statement for education reforms is due to Richard Sagor of Washington State University.
2. Richard J. Murnane and Frank Levy, Teaching the New Basic Skills (New York: Free Press, 1996), p. 32.
3. Pat Ordovensky, "Top Superintendent Heeds 'Customers,'" USA Today, 17 February 1997, p. 4-D.
4. Daniel L. Duke and Bruce Gansneder, "Teacher Responses to At-Risk Students: A Key to Staff Development Planning," in Regis Bernhardt et al., eds., Curriculum Leadership: Redefining Goals for the 21st Century (Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press, 1997).
5. Victoria Benning, "Va. Class Standards Mean No Standing Pat," Washington Post, 24 February 1997, p. A-3.
6. Jessica Portner, "State-of-the-Art School Seeks to Take a Bite Out of Crime," Education Week, 6 September 1995, pp. 6-7.
7. Robert J. Starratt, Building an Ethical School (London: Falmer Press, 1994), p. 60.
8. Alfie Kohn, "How Not to Teach Values: A Critical Look at Character Education," Phi Delta Kappan, February 1997, p. 436.
9. John O'Neil, "A Conversation with Crawford Kilian," Educational Leadership, November 1996, pp. 12, 14-17.
10. For examples of books that address creative thinking, see Peter M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline (New York: Doubleday Currency, 1990);
11. and Charles Thompson, What a Great Idea (New York: Harper Perennial, 1992).