What is the quality of the evidence base for pre-implant surgery of the atrophic jaw?

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1073-1079

  Blackburn, T K ^a   Cawood, J I ^b   Stoelinga, P J W ^c   Lowe, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AINTREE   (United Kingdom)

^b Grosvenor Nuffield Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

dental implants; endosteal implants; evidence based medicine; maxillofacial; oral; osseointegrated implants; preimplant surgery; preprosthetic surgery; procedures; rehabilitation; review; surgery

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BONE GRAFT; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DATA BASE; EMBASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; JAW; MEDLINE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SKULL SURGERY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ATROPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY; HUMANS; JAW; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, PREPROSTHETIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 59349112825     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.002     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Adell R., Lekholm U., Grondahl K., Branemark P.I., Lindstrom J., and Jacobsson M. Reconstruction of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using osseointegrated fixtures in immediate autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 (1990) 233-246
2. Astrand P., Nord P.G., and Branemark P.I. Titanium implants and onlay bone graft to the atrophic edentulous maxilla: a 3-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25 (1996) 25-29
3. Becktor J.P., Isaksson S., and Sennerby L. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 (2004) 107-115
4. Begg C., Cho M., Eastwood S., Horton R., Moher D., Olkin I., Pitkin R., Rennie D., Schulz K.F., Simel D., and Stroup D.F. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276 (1996) 637-639
5. Berglundh T., Persson L., and Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 29 Suppl 3 (2002) 197-212
6. Cawood J.I., and Stoelinga P.J. International academy for oral and facial rehabilitation - Consensus Report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35 (2006) 195-198
7. Christensen D.K., Karoussis I.K., Joss A., Hammerle C.H., and Lang N.P. Simultaneous or staged installation with guided bone augmentation of transmucosal titanium implants. A 3-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 14 (2003) 680-686
8. CONSORT (Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials) group. Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials http://www.consort-statement.co.uk. 2001.
9. Coulthard P, Esposito M, Jokstad A, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD003607.
10. Gunne J., Nyström E., and Kahnberg K.E. Bone grafts and implants in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxillae: a 3-year follow-up of the prosthetic restoration. Int J Prosthodont. 8 (1995) 38-45
11. Hallman M., Sennerby L., Zetterqvist L., and Lundgren S. A 3-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone Clinical, radiographic and resonance frequency analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34 (2005) 273-280
12. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5. The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2005.
13. Johansson B., Wannfors K., Ekenback J., Smedberg J.I., and Hirsch J. Implants and sinus-inlay bone grafts in a 1-stage procedure on severely atrophied maxillae: surgical aspects of a 3-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 (1999) 811-818
14. Kaplan E.L., and Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53 (1958) 457-481
15. Keller E.E. Reconstruction of the severely atrophic edentulous mandible with endosseous implants: a 10-year longitudinal study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53 (1995) 305-320
16. Keller E.E., Tolman D.E., and Eckert S. Surgical-prosthodontic reconstruction of advanced maxillary bone compromise with autogenous onlay block bone grafts and osseointegrated endosseous implants: a 12-year study of 32 consecutive patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 (1999) 197-209
17. Lekholm U., Wannfors K., Isaksson S., and Adielsson B. Oral implants in combination with bone grafts. A 3-year retrospective multicenter study using the Branemark implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28 (1999) 181-187
18. McCulloch P., Taylor I., Sasako M., Lovett B., and Griffin D. Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. BMJ 324 (2002) 1448-1451
19. Moher D., Schulz K.F., and Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 285 (2001) 1987-1991
20. Nystrom E., Ahlqvist J., Gunne J., and Kahnberg K.E. 10-year follow-up of onlay bone grafts and implants in severely resorbed maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33 (2004) 258-262
21. Nystrom E., Kahnberg K.E., and Gunne J. Bone grafts and Branemark implants in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8 (1993) 45-53
22. Olson J.W., Dent C.D., Morris H.F., and Ochi S. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus. Ann Periodontol 5 (2000) 152-156
23. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Levels of Evidence http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp. 2001.
24. Pace-Balzan A., Cawood J.I., Howell R., Butterworth C.J., Lowe D., and Rogers S.N. The further development and validation of the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey of patients attending for oral rehabilitation and general dental practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35 (2006) 72-78
25. Pace-Balzan A., Cawood J.I., Howell R., Lowe D., and Rogers S.N. The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil 31 (2004) 609-617
26. Schliephake H., Neukam F.W., and Wichmann M. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in bone grafts used for the treatment of severe alveolar ridge atrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 (1997) 1227-1233
27. Slade G.D., and Spencer A.J. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 11 (1994) 3-11
28. Stellingsma C., Vissink A., Meijer H.J., Kuiper C., and Raghoebar G.M. Implantology and the severely resorbed edentulous mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15 (2004) 240-248
29. Strassburger C., Heydecke G., and Kerschbaum T. Influence of prosthetic and implant therapy on satisfaction and quality of life: a systematic literature review. Part 1-Characteristics of the studies. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004) 83-93
30. The Cochrane Collaboration. Design algorithm for studies of healthcare interventions http://www.cochrane.dk/nrsmg/docs/chap2fig.gif. 24-9-2001.
31. The Cochrane Collaboration. Draft chapter for the Non-Randomised Study Group of the Cochrane Collaboration. What studies should be included in Cochrane reviews? http://www.cochrane.dk/nrsmg/docs/chap2.pdf. 2001.
32. Tong D.C., Rioux K., Drangsholt M., and Beirne O.R. A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 (1998) 175-182
33. United States Agency of Healthcare Research Quality (AHRQ). Review of systems for analysing quality of evidence http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/strengthsum.htm. 2002.
34. Valentini P., Abensur D., Wenz B., Peetz M., and Schenk R. Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for implant placement: a 5-year study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 20 (2000) 245-253
35. van Steenberghe D. Outcomes and their measurement in clinical trials of endosseous oral implants. Ann Periodontol 2 (1997) 291-298
36. Vermeeren J.I., Wismeijer D., and van Waas M.A. One-step reconstruction of the severely resorbed mandible with onlay bone grafts and endosteal implants A 5-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25 (1996) 112-115
37. Widmark G., Andersson B., Carlsson G.E., Lindvall A.M., and Ivanoff C.J. Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts: a 3- to 5-year follow-up clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16 (2001) 73-79
38. Wiltfang J., Schultze-Mosgau S., Nkenke E., Thorwarth M., Neukam F.W., and Schlegel K.A. Onlay augmentation versus sinuslift procedure in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 5-year comparative longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34 8 (2005) 885-889
39. Woo V.V., Chuang S.-K., Daher S., Muftu A., and Dodson T.B. Dentoalveolar reconstructive procedures as a risk factor for implant failure. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 62 7 (2004) 773-780