"They'll change what they're doing if they know that you're watching": Measuring reactivity in health behavior because of an observer's presence - A case from the Peruvian Amazon

Field Methods

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-25

  Harvey, Steven A ^a   Olórtegui, Paredes Maribel ^b   Leontsini, Elli ^b   Winch, Peter J ^b  

^a United States Agency for International Development Georgia Tuberculosis Prevention Project   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Data validity; Direct observation; Malaria; Peru; Reactivity; Triangulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 59349111195     PISSN: 1525822X     EISSN: 15523969     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X08323987     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Altheide, David L., and John M. Johnson. 1994. "Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research." In Handbook of Qualitative Sociology, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 485-499. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
2. Bernard, H.R. 2000. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bernard, H.R., P. Killworth, D. Kronenfeld, and L. Sailer. 1984. The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 495-517.
4. Clarke, Michael. 1975. Survival in the field: Implications of personal experiences in field work. Theory and Society 2: 95-123.
5. Cousens, S., B. Kanki, S. Toure, I. Diallo, and V. Curtis. 1996. Reactivity and repeatability of hygiene behaviour: Structured observations from Burkina Faso. Social Science & Medicine 43 (9): 1299-308.
6. Curtis, V., S. Cousens, T. Mertens, E. Traore, B. Kanki, and I. Diallo. 1993. Structured observations of hygiene behaviours in Burkina Faso: Validity, variability, and utility. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 71 (1): 23-32.
7. Emerson, R.M. 2001. Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations. 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
8. Gardner, F. 2000. Methodological issues in the direct observation of parent-child interaction: Do observational findings reflect the natural behavior of participants ? Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 3 (3): 185-98.
9. Gittelsohn, J., A.V. Shankar, K.P. West Jr., R. Ram, and T. Gnywali. 1997. Estimating reactivity in direct observation studies of health behaviors. Human Organization 56 (2): 182-89.
10. Gussow, Zachary. 1964. The observer-observed relationship as information about structure in small-group research: A comparative study of urban elementary school classrooms. Psychiatry 27: 230-247.
11. Harvey, S.A. 2006. The whole world will be able to see us: Cultural factors affecting insecticide-treated bed net use for malaria control in the Peruvian Amazon. PhD diss., Johns Hopkins University.
12. Hermida, J., D.D. Nicholas, and S.N. Blumenfeld. 1999. Comparative validity of three methods for assessment of the quality of primary health care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 11(5): 429-33.
13. Manun'Ebo, M., S. Cousens, P. Haggerty, M. Kalengaie, A. Ashworth, and B. Kirkwood. 1997. Measuring hygiene practices: A comparison of questionnaires with direct observations in rural Zaire. Tropical Medicine & International Health 2 (11): 1015-21.
14. Ruel, M.T., and M. Arimond. 2002. Spot-check observational method for assessing hygiene practices: Review of experience and implications for programmes. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 20 (1): 65-76.
15. Scaglion, R. 1986. Nighttime observations in time allocation studies. American Ethnologist 13(3): 537-45.
16. Schnelle, J.F., J.G. Ouslander, and S.F. Simmons. 2006. Direct observations of nursing home care quality: Does care change when observed? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 7 (9): 541-44.
17. Spano, R. 2006. Observer behavior as a potential source of reactivity: Describing and quantifying observer effects in a large-scale observational study of police. Sociological Methods & Research 34 (4): 521-53.
18. Spano, R. 2007. How does reactivity affect police behavior? Describing and quantifying the impact of reactivity as behavioral change in a large-scale observational study of police. Journal of Criminal Justice 35 (4): 453-65.
19. Stange, K.C., S.J. Zyzanski, T.F. Smith, R. Kelly, D.M. Langa, S.A. Flocke, and C.R. Jaen. 1998. How valid are medical records and patient questionnaires for physician profiling and health services research? A comparison with direct observation of patients visits. Medical Care 36 (6): 851-67.
20. Stanton, B.F., J.D. Clemens, K.M. Aziz, and M. Rahman. 1987. Twenty-four-hour recall, knowledge-attitude-practice questionnaires, and direct observations of sanitary practices: A comparative study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 65 (2): 217-22.
21. Strina, A., S. Cairncross, M.L. Barreto, C. Larrea, and M.S. Prado. 2003. Childhood diarrhea and observed hygiene behavior in Salvador, Brazil. American Journal of Epidemiology 157 (11): 1032-38.
22. Webb, E., D.T. Campbell, R.D. Schwartz, and L. Sechrest. 2000. Unobtrusive measures. Rev. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.