Effects of information framing on human papillomavirus vaccination

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 225-233

  Leader, Amy E ^a   Weiner, Judith L ^b   Kelly, Bridget J ^a   Hornik, Robert C ^a   Cappella, Joseph N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WART VIRUS VACCINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CANCER PREVENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MASS MEDIUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VACCINATION; WART VIRUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINES; PARENTS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59349110245     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0711     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Gerberding JL. Report to Congress: Prevention of genital human papillomavirus infection. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 2004.
2. Moscicki AB, Schiffman M, Kjaer S, Villa LL. Updating the natural history of HPV and anogenital cancer. Vaccine 2006;24S3:S42-S51.
3. Greer CE, Wheeler CM, Ladner MB, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) type distribution and serological response to HPV type 6 virus-like particles in patients with genital warts. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2058-2063.
4. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures, 2008. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2008.
5. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. National survey of public knowledge of HPV, the human papillomavirus. Washington, DC: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2004.
6. Lambert EC. College students' knowledge of human papillomavirus and effectiveness of a brief educational intervention. J Am Board Fam Pract 2001;14:178-183.
7. National Cervical Cancer Coalition. National quorum - Expectations and awareness of medical technologies, cervical cancer screening, HPV testing. Van Nuys, CA: NCCC, 2006.
8. National Cancer Institute. Health information national trends survey: Briefs, No.3. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 2006.
9. Zimet GD, Liddon N, Rosenthal SL, Lazcano-Ponce E, Allen B. Psychosocial aspects of vaccine acceptability. Vaccine 2006;24S3:S201-S209.
10. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995;95:314-317.
11. Daley MF, Liddon N, Crane LA, et al. A national survey of pediatrician knowledge and attitudes regarding human papillomavirus vaccination. Pediatrics 2006;118:2280-2289.
12. Riedesel JM, Rosenthal SL, Zimet GD, et al. Attitudes about human papillomavirus vaccine among family physicians. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2005;18:391-398.
13. Kahn JA, Rosenthal SL, Hamann T, Bernstein DI. Attitudes about human papillomavirus vaccine in young women. Int J STD AIDS 2003;14:300-306.
14. Zimet GD, Mays RM, Winston Y, Kee R, Dickes J, Su L. Acceptability of human papillomavirus immunization. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000;9:47-50.
15. Waller J, Marlow LA, Wardle J. Mothers' attitudes towards preventing cervical cancer through human papillomavirus infection. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1257-1261.
16. Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Lawson HW, Chesson H, Unger ER. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 2007;56(RR02):1-24.
17. Stein R. Cervical cancer vaccine gets injected with a social issue: Some fear shot for teens could encourage sex. Washington Post, October 31, 2005:A03.
18. Vaccines and sex. Chicago Tribune, November 4, 2005:C26.
19. Sprigg P. Pro-family, pro-vaccine - but keep it voluntary. Washington Post, July 15, 2006:A21.
20. Entman RM. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 1993;43:51-58.
21. Kinder DR. Communication and opinion. Annu Rev Pol Sci 1998;1:167-197.
22. Kinder DR, Sanders LM. Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996:165.
23. Kahnemann D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 1984;39:341-350.
24. Apanovitch AM, McCarthy D, Salovey P. Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychol 2003;22:60-67.
25. Finney L, Iannoti R. Message framing and mammography screening: A theory-driven intervention. Behav Med 2002;28:5-14.
26. Detweiler JB, Bedell BT, Salovey P, Pronin E, Rothman AJ. Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychol 1999;18:189-196.
27. McCall KD, Johnson RJ, Rothman AJ. The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots. Health Psychol 2002;21:624-628.
28. Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:500-510.
29. Millar MG, Millar K. Promoting safe driving behaviors: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000;30:853-856.
30. Gerend MA, Shepherd JE. Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychol 2007;26:745-752.
31. Calloway C, Jorgensen CM, Saraiya M, Tsui J. A content analysis of news coverage of the HPV vaccine by U.S. newspapers, January 2002-June 2005. J Womens Health 2006;15:803-809.
32. Pineau V, Dennis M. Methodology for probability-based recruitment for a web-enabled panel. Available at www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp/docs/ Knowledge%20Networks%20Methodology.pdf Accessed June 26, 2008.
33. Weibe EF, Eyerman J, Loft J. Evaluating non-response in a web-enabled survey on health and aging. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC. For Presentation at the 2001 Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Montreal, Canada May 17-20, 2001.
34. The Pew Research Center for People and the Press. News audiences increasingly politicized. Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center for People and the Press, 2004.
35. Sperber NR, Brewer NT, Smith JS. Influence of parent characteristics and disease outcome framing on HPV vaccine acceptability among rural, Southern women. Cancer Causes Control 2008;19:115-118.
36. Friedman AL, Shepeard H. Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and commuication preferences of the general public regarding HPV: Findings from CDC focus group research and implications for practice. Health Educ Behav 2007;34:471-485.
37. Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. Cost to immunize one child in public sector, 2007. Available www.astho.org/pubs/ 2007HillCosttoimmunize1.pdf Accessed February 15, 2008.
38. Collins SR, Davis K, Doty MM, Kriss JL, Holmgren AL. Gaps in health insurance: An all-American problem. Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey New York: The Commonwealth Fund, April 2006.
39. DiIorio C, Kelley M. Communication about sexual issues: Mothers, fathers, and friends. J Adolesc Health 1999;24:181-189.
40. Brewer NT, Cuite CL, Herrington JE, Weinstein ND. Risk compensation and vaccination: Can getting vaccinated cause people to engage in risky behaviors? Ann Behav Med 2007;34:95-99.
41. Barth KR, Cook RL, Downs JS, Switzer GE, Fischhoff B. Social stigma and negative consequences: Factors that influence college students' decisions to seek testing for sexually transmitted infections. J Am Coll Health 2002;50:153-159.
42. Fortenberry JD. The effects of stigma on genital herpes care-seeking behaviours. Herpes 2004;11:8-11.
43. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention. HPV communication outreach. Report No. 2001-Q-00133 [E-40]. Atlanta, GA: ORC Macro International, 2002.
44. O'Keefe DJ. Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Commun Theory 2003;13:251-274.
45. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
46. Armitage CJ, Connor M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001;40:471-500.
47. Sheppard BH, Hartwick J, Warshaw PR. The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J Consum Res 1988;15:325-343.