Economic reasoning and judicial review

Economic Journal

Volumn 119, Issue 535, 2009, Pages

  Breyer, Stephen ^a  

^a United States Supreme Court ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LEGISLATIVE IMPLEMENTATION; PRICE DYNAMICS; PROPERTY RIGHTS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 59349092015     PISSN: 00130133     EISSN: 14680297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02233.x     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. U.S. 457(2001).
2. U.S.C. § 7409(b)(1).
3. U.S. at 490 - 96 (Breyer, J., concurring).
4. U.S. 127 S. Ct. 2705 (2007)
5. See Lord Woolf, Final Report: Access to Justice, Ch.13 (July 26, 1996).
6. UK Dept for Constitutional Affairs, Civil Procedure Rules 35.7, 35.8 (2003).
7. See The Lord Chancellor's Dept, Civil Justice Reform Evaluation, Emerging Findings: An Early Evaluation the Civil Justice Reforms (March 2001);
8. The Lord Chancellor's Dept, Civil Justice Reform Evaluation, Further Findings: A Continuing Evaluation of the Civil Justice Reforms (August 2002).
9. See, e.g., M. Neil Browne et al., The Perspectival Nature of Expert Testimony in the United States, England, Korea, and France, 18 Conn. J. Int'l L. 55, 96 - 100 (2002).
10. High Court of Paris, May 22, 2000, Interim Court Order No. 00105308 (cited in Yahoo!, Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'Antisemitsme, 169 F. Supp.2d 1181 (N. D. Cal. 2001)).
11. 123 S. Ct. 769 (2003).
12. US Constitution, Art. I, § 8, cl. 8.
13. 123 S. Ct. at 801 - 814 (Breyer, J., dissenting).