Gender and organizational rule abidance

Public Administration Review

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 339-347

  Portillo, Shannon ^a   Dehart Davis, Leisha ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59349091014     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01978.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Acker, Joan. 1992. Gendering Organizational Theory. In Gendering Organizational Analysis, edited by Albert J. Mills and Peta Tancred, 248 60. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications.
2. Aiken, Michael, and Jerald Hage. 1966. Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis. American Sociological Review 31 (4 497 507.
3. Baker, Sally Hillsman, Amitai Etzioni, Richard A. Hanson, and Marvin Sontag. 1973. Tolerance for Bureaucratic Structure: Theory and Measurement. Human Relations 26 (6 775 86.
4. Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures. Politics and Gender 1 (1 97 125.
5. Burrell, Gibson, and Jeff Hearn. 1989. The Sexuality of Organization. In The Sexuality of Organization, edited by Jeff R. Hearn, Deborah L. Sheppard, Peta Tancred-Sheriff, and Gibson Burrell, 1 28. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications.
6. Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. 2nd ed. New York : Routledge.
7. Child, John, and Tony Ellis. 1973. Predictors of Variation in Managerial Roles. Human Relations 26 (1 227 50.
8. Cresswell, Mark. 2003. Sex/Gender: Which Is Which? A Rejoinder to Mary Riege Laner. Sociological Inquiry 73 (1 138 51.
9. DeHart-Davis, Leisha. 2007. The Unbureaucratic Personality. Public Administration Review 67 (5 892 903.
10. Duerst-Lahti, Georgia, and Rita Mae Kelly, eds. 1995. Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
11. Fox, Richard L., and Robert A. Schuhmann. 1999. Gender and Local Government: A Comparison of Women and Men City Managers. Public Administration Review 59 (3 231 42.
12. Gordon, Leonard V. 1970. Measurement of Bureaucratic Orientation. Personnel Psychology 23 (1 1 11.
13. Green, Arnold W., and Eleanor Melnick. 1950. What Has Happened to the Feminist Movement? In Studies in Leadership, edited by Alvin W. Gouldner, 277 302. New York : Harper & Brothers.
14. Grey, Sandra. 2006. Numbers and Beyond: The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research. Politics and Gender 2 (4 492 502.
15. Guy, Mary E. 1995. Women, Public Administration, and the Personnel Function. In Public Personnel Administration: Problems and Prospects, edited by Steven W. Hays and Richard C. Kearney, 232 46. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
16. Guy, Mary Ellen, and Meredith A. Newman. 2004. Women's Jobs, Men's Jobs: Sex Segregation and Emotional Labor. Public Administration Review 64 (3 289 98.
17. Hood-Williams, John. 1996. Goodbye to Sex and Gender. Sociological Review 44 (1 1 16.
18. Hood-Williams, John. 1997. Real Sex/Fake Gender: A Reply to Robert Willmott. Sociological Review 45 (1 42 58.
19. Kanter, Rosebeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York : Basic Books.
20. Keiser, Lael R., Vicky M. Wilkins, Kenneth J. Meier, and Catherine A. Holland. 2002. Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review 96 (3 553 64.
21. King, Cheryl Simrell. 1995. Sex-Role Identity and Decision Styles: How Gender Helps Explain the Paucity of Women at the Top. In Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance, edited by Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly, 67 92. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
22. Knapp, Robert R. 1963. Personality Correlates of Delinquency Rate in a Navy Sample. Journal of Applied Psychology 47 (1 68 71.
23. Knapp, Robert R. 1964. Value and Personality Differences Between Offenders and Nonoffenders. Journal of Applied Psychology 48 (1 59 62.
24. Kohn, Melvin. 1977. Class and Conformity: A Study in Values. 2nd ed. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
25. Laner, Mary Riege. 2000. "Sex" vs. "Gender": A Renewed Plea. Sociological Inquiry 70 (4 462 74.
26. Laner, Mary Riege. 2003. A Rejoinder to Mark Cresswell. Sociological Inquiry 73 (1 152 56.
27. Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
28. Meeker, B.F., and P.A. Weitzel-O'Neill. 1977. Sex Roles and Interpersonal Behavior in Task-Oriented Groups. American Sociological Review 42 (1 91 105.
29. Meier, Kenneth J, Laurence J. O'Toole, Jr., and Holly T. Goerdel. 2006. Management Activity and Program Performance: Gender as Management Capital. Public Administration Review 66 (1 24 36.
30. Morrison, Elizabeth. 2006. Doing the Job Well: An Investigation of Pro-Social Rule Breaking. Journal of Management 32 (1 5 28.
31. Mulder, Frans. 1971. Characteristics of Violators of Formal Company Rules. Journal of Applied Psychology 55 (3 500 502.
32. Newman, Meredith A. 1994. Gender and Lowi's Thesis: Implications for Career Advancement. Public Administration Review 54 (3 277 84.
33. Newman, Meredith A. 1995. The Gendered Nature of Lowi's Typology; or, Who Would Guess You Could Find Gender Here. In Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance, edited by Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly, 141 64. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
34. Oakley, Ann. 1972. Sex, Gender, and Society. San Francisco : Harper & Row.
35. Schaef, Anne Wilson. 1992. Women's Reality: An Emerging Female System. 3rd ed. San Francisco : Harper.
36. Stivers, Camilla. 2002. Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
37. Thomas, George M., Henry A. Walker, and Morris Zelditch, Jr. 1986. Legitimacy and Collective Action. Social Forces 65 (2 378 404.
38. Thompson, Victor A. 1977. Modern Organization. 2nd ed. New York : Alfred A. Knopf.
39. Willmott, Robert. 1996. Resisting Sex/Gender Conflation: A Reply. Sociological Review 44 (4 728 45.