Effective electromagnetic noise cancellation with beamformers and synthetic gradiometry in shielded and partly shielded environments

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 178, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 120-127

  Adjamian, P ^a   Worthen, S F ^b,c   Hillebrand, A ^d   Furlong, P L ^b   Chizh, B A ^e   Hobson, A R ^f   Aziz, Q ^c   Barnes, G R ^b  

^a MRC INSTITUTE OF HEARING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CHEPS; ECD; Magnetic shielding; MEG; Regularised and unregularised beamformers; SAM; Synthetic gradiometers

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NOISE REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; THERMAL STIMULATION;

BIOPHYSICS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; HEAD; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NOISE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 59249091647     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adjamian P., Barnes G.R., Hillebrand A., Holliday I.E., Singh K.D., Furlong P.L., et al. Co-registration of MEG with MRI using bite-bar-based fiducials and surface-matching. Clin Neurophysiol 155 3 (2004) 691-698
2. Apkarian A.V., Bushnell M.C., Treede R.-D., and Zubieta J.-K. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain 9 (2005) 463-484
3. Barnes G.R., and Hillebrand A. Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images. Hum Brain Map 18 (2003) 1-12
4. Bingel U., Lorenz J., Glauche V., Knab R., Glascher J., Weiller C., et al. Somatotopic organization of human somatosensory cortices for pain: a single trial fMRI study. Neuroimage 23 (2004) 224-232
5. Carelli P., and Leoni R. Localization of biological sources with arrays of superconducting gradiometers. J Appl Phys 59 (1986) 645-650
6. Chang P.F., Arendt-Nielsen L., and Chen A.C. Dynamic changes and spatial correlation of EEG activities during cold pressor test in man. Brain Res Bull 57 (2002) 667-675
7. Derbyshire S.W.G., Jones A.K.P., Gyulai F., Clark S., Townsend D., and Firestone L. Pain processing during three levels of noxious stimulation produces differential patterns of central activity. Pain 73 (1997) 431-445
8. Derbyshire S.W.G. A systematic review of neuroimaging data during visceral stimulation. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 12-20
9. Friston K.J., Holmes P., Worsley J., Poline J.-P., Frith C.D., and Frackowiak R.S.J. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Map 2 (1994) 189-210
10. Garcia-Larrea L., Frot M., and Valeriani M. Brain generators of laser-evoked potentials: from dipoles to functional significance. Neurophysiol Clin 33 (2003) 279-292
11. Graimann B., Huggins J.E., Levine S.P., and Pfurtscheller G. Visualization of significant ERD/ERS patterns in multichannel EEG and ECoG data. Clin Neurophysiol 113 1 (2002) 43-47
12. Gross J., Kujala J., Hämäläinen M., Timmermann L., Schnitzler A., and Salmelin R. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98 (2001) 694-699
13. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi J., Knuutila J., and Lounasmaa O.V. MEG: theory, instrumentation and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 65 2 (1993) 413-497
14. Hari R., and Salmelin R. Human cortical oscillations: a neuromagnetic view through the skull. Trends Neurosci 20 (1997) 44-49
15. Hillebrand A., and Barnes G.R. The use of anatomical constraints with MEG beamformers. Neuroimage 20 4 (2003) 2302-2313
16. Hillebrand A., Singh K.D., Holliday I.E., Furlong P.L., and Barnes G.R. A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography. Hum Brain Map 25 2 (2005) 199-211
17. Hirata M., Kato A., Taniguchi M., Ninomiya H., Cheyne D., Robinson S.E., et al. Frequency-dependent spatial distribution of human somatosensory evoked neuromagnetic fields. Neurosci Lett 318 2 (2002) 73-76
18. Huber M.T., Bartling J., Pachur D., Woikowsky-Biedau S., and Lautenbacher S. EEG responses to tonic heat pain. Exp Brain Res 173 (2006) 14-24
19. Inui K., Wang X., Qiu Y., Nguyen B.T., Ojima S., Tamura Y., et al. Pain processing within the primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Eur J Neurosci 18 (2003) 2859-2866
20. Lalo E., Gilbertson T., Doyle L., Lazzaro V.D., Cioni B., and Brown P. Phasic increases in cortical beta activity are associated with alterations in sensory processing in the human. Exp Brain Res 177 (2007) 137-145
21. Le Pera D., Valeriani M., Niddam D., Chen A.C., and Arendt-Nielsen L. Contact heat evoked potentials to painful and non-painful stimuli: effect of attention towards stimulus properties. Brain Topogr 15 (2002) 115-123
22. Lounasmaa O.V., Hamaliainen M., Hari R., and Salmelin R. Information processing in the human brain: magnetoencephalographic approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93 (1996) 8809-8815
23. Mosher J.C., Lewis P.S., and Leahy R.M. Multiple dipole modeling and localisation from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 39 (1992) 541-557
24. Peyron R., Laurent B., and Garcia-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 30 (2000) 263-288
25. Polich J., and Kok A. Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review. Biol Psychol 41 (1995) 103-146
26. Raij T.T., Forss N., Stancak A., and Hari R. Modulation of motor-cortex oscillatory activity by painful Adelta- and C-fiber stimuli. Neuroimage 23 (2004) 569-573
27. Robinson S.E., and Vrba J. Functional neuroimaging by synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM). In: Yoshimoto T., Kotani M., Kuriki S., Karibe H., and Nakasato N. (Eds). Recent advances in biomagnetism (1999), Tohoku University Press, Sendai 302-305
28. Sekihara K., Poeppel D., and Miyashita Y. Virtual depth-electrode measurement using MEG eigenspace beamformer. Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference, vol. 1 (1999) 464
29. Singh K.D., Holliday I.E., Furlong P.L., and Harding G.F.A. Evaluation of MEG/EEG co-registration strategies using Monte Carlo simulation. Electroen Clin Neurophysiol 102 (1997) 81-85
30. Stern J., Jeanmonod D., and Sarnthein J. Persistent EEG overactivation in the cortical pain matrix of neurogenic pain patients. Neuroimage 31 (2006) 721-731
31. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., and John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150 (1965) 1187-1188
32. Taulu S., Kajola M., and Simola J. Suppression of interference and artefacts by the signal space separation method. Brain Topogr 16 (2004) 269-275
33. Van Veen B.D., Van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., and Suzuki A. Localisation of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 44 (1997) 867-880
34. Vrba J. Magnetoencephalography: the art of finding a needle in a haystack. Physica C 368 (2002) 1-9
35. Vrba J., and Robinson S.E. Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. Method 25 2 (2001) 249-271