Influence of microleakage, surface roughness and biofilm control on secondary caries formation around composite resin restorations: An in situ evaluation

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 61-65

  Lima, Fábio Garcia ^a   Romano, Ana Regina ^b   Correa, Marcos Britto ^b   Demarco, Flávio Fernando ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDADE DO OESTE DE SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biofilm; Dental caries; Dental leakage; Dental plaque

Indexed keywords

EID: 59149101262     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000100012     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Attin T, Weiss K, Becker K, Buchalla W, Wiegand A. Impact of modified acidic soft drinks on enamel erosion. Oral Dis. 2005;11(1):7-12.
2. Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues ALJr, Cury JA. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res. 1993;27(4):280-4.
3. Boeckh C, Schumacher E, Podbielski A, Haller B: Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro. Caries Res. 2002;36(2):101-7.
4. Cenci MS, Tenuta LM, Pereira-Censi T, Del Bel Cury AA, Ten Cate JM, Cury JA. Effect of microleakage and fluoride on enamel-dentine demineralization aroud restorations. Caries Res. 2008;42(5):369-79.
5. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(3) 306-35.
6. Fontana M, González-Cabezas C. Secondary caries and restoration replacement: an unresolved problem. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21(1):15-26.
7. Gilmour AS, Edmunds DH. The polarized light microscopic appearance of caries-like lesion adjacent to restored cavities in the crowns and roots of extracted human teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25(12):929-39.
8. Hals E, Nernaes A: Histopathology of in vitro caries developing around silver amalgam fillings. Caries Res. 1971;5:58-77.
9. Hara AT, Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr. Cariostatic effect of fluoride-containing restorative systems associated with dentifrices on root dentin. J Dent. 2002;30(5-6):205-12.
10. Holmen L, Thylstrup A, Artun J. Clinical and histological features observed during arrestment of active enamel carious lesions in vivo. Caries Res. 1987;21(6):546-54.
11. Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. Diagnosis of secondary caries: a laboratory study. Br Dent J. 1994;176(4):135-9.
12. Kidd EAM. Diagnosis of secondary caries. J Dent Educ 2001;65(10):997- 1000.
13. Kotsanos N. An intraoral study of caries induced on enamel in contact with fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Caries Res. 2001;35(3):200-4.
14. Marsh Pd, Nyvad B. The oral microflora and biofilm on teeth; in: Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM. Dental Caries: the disease and Its clinical management, Oxford; Blackwell Munksgaard; 2003. p 29-48.
15. Mjör IA. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:1426-33.
16. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(3):165-79.
17. Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, Donati ME, Breschi L, Prati C, et al. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):4457-63.
18. Neme AL, Frazier KB, Roeder LB, Debner TL. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2002;27(1):50-8.
19. Özer L, Thylstrup A. What is known about caries in relation to restorations as a reason for replacement? A review. Adv Dent Res. 1995;9(1):394-402.
20. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Santos Dias CTdos. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites. Am J Dent. 2002;15(3):193-7.
21. Thomas RZ, Ruben JL, ten Bosch JJ, Fidler V, Huysmans MC. Approximal secondary caries lesion progression, a 20-week in situ study. Caries Res. 2007;41(5):399-405.
22. Yamamoto K, Ohashi S, Taki E, Hirata K. Adherence of oral streptococci to composite resin of varying surface roughness. Dent Mater J. 1996;15(1):201-4.