Formulation of locally reacting surfaces in FDTD/K-DWM modelling of acoustic spaces

Acta Acustica united with Acustica

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 891-906

  Kowalczyk, Konrad ^a   Van Walstijn, Maarten ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ACOUSTICS; AUDIO ACOUSTICS; FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME DOMAIN METHOD; NUMERICAL METHODS; REFLECTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

ACOUSTIC SYSTEMS; ANALYTIC EVALUATIONS; ANGLES OF INCIDENCES; BOUNDARY ANALYSIS; BOUNDARY EDGES; DIGITAL WAVEGUIDE MESHES; FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME DOMAINS; FREQUENCY DEPENDENTS; FREQUENCY DOMAINS; IMPEDANCE BOUNDARIES; KIRCHHOFF; LEAPFROG SCHEMES; LOW IMPEDANCES; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; PRESSURE WAVES; VIRTUAL ACOUSTICS;

TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

EID: 59149097289     PISSN: 16101928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3813/AAA.918107     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M. Vorländer: International round robin on room acoustical computer simulations. Proc. Int. Cong, on Acoustics, ICA (June 1995) 689-692. Trondheim, Norway.
2. U. Svensson: Modelling acoustic spaces for audio virtual reality. Work, on Model based Proc. and Coding of Audio (MPCA) (November 2002) 109-116. Leuven, Belgium.
3. L. Savioja, V. Välimäki: Reducing the dispersion error in the digital waveguide mesh using interpolation and frequency warping techniques. IEEE Trans. Speech and Audio Processing 8 (March 2000) 184-194.
4. K. Kowalczyk, M. van Walstijn: On-line simulation of 2D resonators with reduced dispersion error using compact implicit finite difference methods. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 1 (April 2007) 285-288. Honolulu, Hawaii.
5. D. Botteldooren: Finite-difference time-domain simulation of low-frequency room acoustic problems. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 3302-3308.
6. S. van Duyne, J. O. Smith: The 2-D digital waveguide mesh. Proc. IEEE Worksh. on Appl. of Signal Processing (October 1993). Mohonk, NY.
7. M. Karjalainen, C. Erkut: Digital waveguide vs. finite difference schemes: Equivalence and mixed modeling. EURASIP J. Applied Signal Processing (June 2004) 978-989.
8. A. Kelloniemi, L. Savioja, V. Välimäki: Spatial filter-based absorbing boundary for the 2-D digital waveguide mesh. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 12 (February 2005) 126-129.
9. L. Savioja, T. Rinne, T. Takala: Simulation of room acoustics with a 3-D finite difference mesh. Proc. Int. Computer Music Conf. (ICMC) (September 1994) 463-466. Aarhus, Denmark.
10. J. Huopaniemi, L. Savioja, M. Karjalainen: Modeling of reflections and air absorption in acoustical spaces - a digital filter design approach. Proc. IEEE Worksh. on Appl. of Signal Processing (October 1997) 1-4. New Palz, NY.
11. A. Kelloniemi: Frequency-dependent boundary condition for the 3-D digital waveguide mesh. Proc. Int. Conf. Digital Audio Effects (DAFx'06) (September 2006) 161-164. Montreal, Canada.
12. D. Murphy, M. Beeson: The KW-boundary hybrid digital waveguide mesh for room acoustics applications. IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing 12 (2007) 552-564.
13. K. Kowalczyk, M. van Walstijn: Formulation of a locally reacting wall in finite difference modelling of acoustic spaces. Proc. Int. Symp. Room Acoustics (ISRA) (September 2007) 1-6. Seville, Spain.
14. H. Kuttruff: Room acoustics. Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London, 1973.
15. S. Bilbao: Wave and scattering methods for numerical simulation. John Wiley & Sons, London, 2004.
16. A. Taflove, S. Hagness: Computational electrodynamics: The finite-difference time-domain method, 2nd ed. Artech House, Norwood, MA, 2000.
17. J. Thomas: Numerical partial differential equations: Finite difference methods. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
18. L. Savioja, M. Karjalainen, T. Takala: DSP formulation of a finite difference method for room acoustics simulation. Proc. IEEE Nordic Signal Processing Symp. (NORSIG'96) 2 (September 1996) 455-458. Espoo, Finland.
19. D. Murphy, J. Mullen: Digital waveguide mesh modelling of room acoustics: Improved anechoic boundaries. Proc. Int. Conf. Digital Audio Effects (DAFx'02) (September 2002) 163-168. Hamburg, Germany.
20. B. Gustafsson, H.-O. Kreiss, A. Sundström: Time dependent problems and difference methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995.
21. J. O. Smith: Physical audio signal processing for virtual musical instruments and digital audio effects. W3K Publishing, http://books.wk3.org, August 2006.
22. K. Kowalczyk, M. van Walstijn: Virtual room acoustics using finite difference methods. How to model and analyse frequency-dependent boundaries? Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Communications, Conrol and Signal Processing (ISCCSP) (March 2008) 1504-1509. Malta.