Current state of digital mammography

Breast Cancer

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 194-199

  Shiraishi, Akihiko ^a  

^a JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast image; Digital mammography; Radiographic magnification; Soft copy reading

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 59149097269     PISSN: 13406868     EISSN: 18804233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-008-0046-z     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year followup before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 2003;361:1405-10. (Pubitemid 36515039)
2. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, Holmqvist M, Yen M, Abdsalah S, Epstein B, Frodis E, Ljungberg E, Hedborg C, Sundbom A, Tholin M, Wiege M, Akerlund A, Wu H, Tung T, Chiu Y, Chiu C, Huang C, Smith RA, Rosén M, Stenbeck M, Holmberg L. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 2002;95:458-69. (Pubitemid 34810170)
3. Baker LH. Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: fiveyear summary report. CA Cancer J Clin. 1982;32:194-225. (Pubitemid 12062706)
4. Feig SA, Shaber GS, Patchefsky A, Schwartz GF, Edeiken J, Libshitz HI, Nerlinger R, Curley RF, Wallace JD. Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors. AJR 1977;128:403-8. (Pubitemid 8051586)
5. Feig SA, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:1205-30.
6. Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Munzel U, Baum F, Grabbe E. Screen film vs. full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1697-702. (Pubitemid 36940253)
7. Hermann KP, Hundertmark C, Funke M, Brenndorff AV, Grabbe E. Digital mammography in direct magnification technique using a large-area amorphous silicon X-ray detector. Rofo 1999;170:503-06. (Pubitemid 29258401)
8. Shtern F. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the national cancer institute. Radiology 1992;183:629-30.
9. Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Grabbe E. Radiation exposure in fullfield digital mammography with a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screenfilm mammography. Rofo 2000;172:940-45. (Pubitemid 32004968)
10. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs. screenfilm mammography. Eur Radiol. 1977;12:2679-83.
11. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, Sisney GA, Kuni CC, Cutter GR. Comparison of fullfield digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 1977;218:873-80.
12. Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Populationbased mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I study. Radiology 2003;229:877-84. (Pubitemid 37467596)
13. Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus fullfield digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-the Oslo II study. Radiology 2004;232:197-204. (Pubitemid 38787838)
14. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, Cutter GR. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography, screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:671-77. (Pubitemid 34919579)
15. Feig SA, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography. Radiographics 1998;18:893-901. (Pubitemid 128466695)
16. Applegate KE, Tello R, Ying J. Hypothesis testing III: counts and medians. Radiology 2003;228(3):603-8. (Pubitemid 37025463)
17. Albagli D, Hudspeth H, Possin GE, Lee JU. Performance of advanced a-Si/CsI-based flat panel x-ray detector for mammography. Proc SPIE. 2003;5030:553-63.
18. Bloomquist AK, Yaffe MJ, Mawdsley GE, Hunter DM, Beideck DJ. Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system. Med Phys. 2006;33:2998-3005. (Pubitemid 44154572)
19. Gennaro G, di Maggio C. Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2559-66. (Pubitemid 44649706)
20. Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR. Performance comparison of fullfield digital mammography to Screenfilm mammography in clinical practice. Med Phys. 2002;29:830-4. (Pubitemid 34525912)
21. Sickels EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;46:661-3.
22. Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, Grabbe EH. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2188-91. (Pubitemid 36940311)
23. Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Munzel U, Baum F, Grabbe E. Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1697-702. (Pubitemid 36940253)
24. Curtis DJ, Gayler BW, Gitlin JN, Harrington MB. Teleradiology: results of a field trial. Radiology 1983;149(2):415-8. (Pubitemid 14226152)
25. Langlotz CP. Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research. Radiology 2003;228(1):3-9. (Pubitemid 36736061)
26. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field mammography vs. screen-film mamography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2679-83. (Pubitemid 36940378)
27. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, Diorsi C, Jong R, Rebner R. Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1773-83. (Pubitemid 41549889)
28. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, Geller BM, Abraham LA, Taplin SH, Dignan M, Cutter G, Ballard-Barbash R. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):168-75. (Pubitemid 36231622)
29. Porter PL, El-Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT, Lin MG, Khalid N, Watney EA, Cousens L, White D, Taplin S, White E. Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91(23):2020-8.
30. Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Hemminger BM, Brown ML, Johnston RE, Kuzmiak CM, Braeuning MP, Freimanis RI, Soo MS, Baker JA, Walsh R. Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 2002;223:483-8. (Pubitemid 34454330)
31. Roelofs AA, van Woudenberg S, Otten JD, Hendriks JH, Bodicker A, Evertsz CJ, Karssemeijer N. Effect of soft-copy display supported by CAD on mammography screening performance. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:45-52. (Pubitemid 43103567)
32. Bick U, Giger ML, Schmidt RA, Nishikawa RM, Doi K. Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms. Radiographics 1996;16:1403-11. (Pubitemid 126448190)
33. Byng JW, Critten JP, Yaffe MJ. Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images. Radiology 1997;203:564-68. (Pubitemid 27176239)
34. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Funke M, Hermann KP, Grabbe E. Digital full field mammography: comparison between radiographic direct magnification and digital monitor zooming. Radiologe 2002;42:261-64. (Pubitemid 36069718)