Persistent neural states: Stationary localized activity patterns in nonlinear continuous n-population, q-dimensional neural networks

Neural Computation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 147-187

  Faugeras, Olivier ^a   Veltz, Romain ^a   Grimbert, François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN CORTEX; CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE TRACT; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TIME;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEURONS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 59149090694     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2009.12-07-660     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Amari, S.-L (1977). Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields. Biological Cybernetics, 27(2), 77-87.
2. Appell, J., & Chen, C.-J. (2006). How to solve Hammerstein equations. Journal of integral equations and applications, 18(3), 287-296.
3. Blomquist, P., Wyller, J., & Einevoll, G. (2005). Localized activity patterns in two-population neuronal networks. Physica D, 206, 180-212.
4. Bressloff, P. (2005). Spontaneous symmetry breaking in self-organizing neural fields. Biological Cybernetics, 93(4), 256-274.
5. Buxhoeveden, D., & Casanova, M. (2002). The minicolumn hypothesis in neuroscience. Brain, 125, 935-951.
6. Chalupa, L. M., & Werner, J. (Eds.). (2004). The visual neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Colby, C., Duhamel, J., & Goldberg, M. (1995). Oculocentric spatial representation in parietal cortex. Cereb. Cortex, 5, 470-481.
8. Coombes, S. (2005). Waves, bumps, and patterns in neural fields theories. Biological Cybernetics, 93(2), 91-108.
9. David, O., Cosmelli, D., & Friston, K. J. (2004). Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model. Neurolmage, 21, 659-673.
10. David, O., & Friston, K. J. (2003). A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: Coupling and neuronal dynamics. Neurolmage, 20, 1743-1755.
11. Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical neuroscience: Computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Delfour, M., & Zolésio, J.-P. (2001). Shapes and geometries: Advances in design and control. Philadelphia: SIAM.
13. Dieudonné, J. (1960). Foundations of modern analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14. Doubrovinski, K. (2005). Dynamics, stability and bifurcation phenomena in the nonlocal model of cortical activity (UUDM Project Report 2005:8). Uppsala: Uppsala University, Department of Mathematics.
15. Ermentrout, B. (1998). Neural networks as spatio-temporal pattern-forming systems. Reports on Progress in Physics, 61, 353-430.
16. Evans, L. (1998). Partial differential equations. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
17. Faugeras, O., Grimbert, F., & Slotdne, J.-J. (2007). Stability and synchronization in neural fields (Tech. Rep. RR-6212). Sophia-Antdpolis, France: INRIA.
18. Freeman, W. (1975). Mass action in the nervous system. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
19. Funahashi, S., Bruce, C., & Goldman-Rakic, P. (1989). Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 61, 331- 349.
20. Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. M. (2002). Mathematical formulations of Hebbian learning. Biological Cybernetics, 87, 404-415.
21. Grimbert, F., & Faugeras, O. (2006). Bifurcation analysis of Jansen's neural mass model. Neural Computation, 18(11), 3052-3068.
22. Guo, Y., & Chow, C. (2005a). Existence and stability of standing pulses in neural networks: II: Stability. SIAM journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 4, 249-281.
23. Guo, Y., & Chow, C. C. (2005b). Existence and stability of standing pulses in neural networks: I. Existence. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 4(2), 217-248.
24. Gutkin, B., Ermentrout, G., & O'Sullivan, J. (2000). Layer 3 patchy recurrent excitatory connections may determine the spatial organization of sustained activity in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neurocomputing, 32-33, 391-400.
25. Hadamard, J. (1968). Memoire sur un problème d'analyse relatif à l'équilibre des plaques élastiques encastrées. In Mémoire des savants étrangers. Paris: CNRS.
26. Haeusler, S., & Maass, W. (2007). A statistical analysis of information-processing properties of lamina-specific cortical microcircuits models. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 149-162.
27. Hammerstein, A. (1930). Nichtlineare integralgleichungen nebst anwendungen. Acta Math., 54, 117-176.
28. Hazewinkel, M. (Ed.). (2001). Encyclopaedia of Mathematics. Berlin: Springer.
29. Hopfield, J. J. (1984). Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 81(10), 3088-3092.
30. Hoppenstaedt, F., & Izhikevich, E. (1997). Weakly connected neural networks. New York: Springer-Verlag.
31. Jansen, B. H., & Rit, V. G. (1995). Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 357-366.
32. Jansen, B. H., Zouridakis, G., & Brandt, M. E. (1993). A neurophysiologically-based mathematical model of flash visual evoked potentials. Biological Cybernetics, 68, 275-283.
33. Kandel, E., Schwartz, J., & Jessel, T. (2000). Principles of neural Science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Kishimoto, K., & Amari, S. (1979). Existence and stability of local excitations in homogeneous neural fields. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 7(4), 303-318.
35. Krasnosel'skii, M., Vainikko, G., Zabreiko, P., & Stetsenko, V. (1972). Approximate solutions of operator equations (trans. D. Louvish). Gröningen: Wolteers-Noordhoff.
36. Kubota, S., & Aihara, K. (2005). Analyzing global dynamics of a neural field model. Neural Processing Letters, 21, 133-141.
37. Laing, C., & Troy, W. (2003). Two-bump solutions of Amari-type models of neuronal pattern formation. Physica D, 178(3), 190-218.
38. Laing, C., Troy, W., Gutkin, B., & Ermentrout, G. (2002). Multiple bumps in a neuronal model of working memory. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63(1), 62-97.
39. Lopes da Silva, F., Blanes, W., Kalitzin, S., Parra, J., Suffczynski, P., & Velis, D. (2003), Dynamical diseases of brain systems: Different routes to epileptic seizures. IEEE Transactions in Biomedical Engeneering, 50(5), 540-548.
40. Lopes da Silva, F., Hoeks, A., & Zetterberg, L. (1974). Model of brain rhythmic activity. Kybernetik, 15, 27-37.
41. Lopes da Silva, F., van Rotterdam, A., Barts, P., van Heusden, E., & Burr, W. (1976). Model of neuronal populations: The basic mechanism of rhythmicity. In M. A. Corner & D. F. Swaab (Eds.), Progress in brain research (pp. 281-308). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
42. Matsuoka, K. (1992). Stability conditions for nonlinear continuous neural networks with asymmetric connection weights. Neural Networks, 5, 495-500.
43. Miller, E., Erickson, C., & Desimone, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefrontal cortex of the macaque. J. Neurosci., 16, 5154-5167.
44. Mountcastle, V. (1957). Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatosensory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 20, 408-434.
45. Mountcastle, V. (1997). The columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain, 120, 701-722.
46. Nunez, P. (2005). Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of EEG. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Owen, M., Laing, C., & Coombes, S. (2007). Bumps and rings in a two-dimensional neural field: Splitting and rotational instabilities. New Journal of Physics, 9, 378-401.
48. Pinto, D., & Ermentrout, G. (2001a). Spatially structured activity in synaptically coupled neuronal networks: 1. Traveling fronts and pulses. SIAM J. of Appl. Math., 62, 206-225.
49. Pinto, D., & Ermentrout, G. (2001b). Spatially structured activity in synaptically coupled neuronal networks: 2. Standing pulses. SIAM J. of Appl. Math., 62, 226-243.
50. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling, W. T. (1988). Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Rubin, J., & Troy, W. (2004). Sustained spatial patterns of activity in neuronal populations without recurrent excitation. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 64(5), 1609-1635.
52. Sokolowski, J., & Zolésio, J.-P. (1992). Introduction to shape optimization: Shape sensitivity analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
53. Stoer, J., & Bulirsch, R. (1972). Introduction to numerical analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
54. Thomson, A. M., & Bannister, A. P. (2003). Interlaminar connections in the neocortex. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 5-14.
55. Tricomi, F. (1985). Integral equations. New York: Dover.
56. van Rotterdam, A., Lopes da Silva, F., van den Ende, J., Viergever, M., & Hermans, A, (1982). A model of the spatial-temporal characteristics of the alpha rhythm. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 44(2), 283-305.
57. Wendling, F., Bartolomei, F., Bellanger, J., & Chauvel, P. (2001). Interpretation of interdependencies in epileptic signals using a macroscopic physiological model of the EEG. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(7), 1201-1218.
58. Wendling, E, Bellanger, J., Bartolomei, F., & Chauvel, P. (2000). Relevance of nonlinear lumped-parameter models in the analysis of depth-EEG epileptic signals. Biological Cybernetics, 83, 367-378.
59. Werner, H., & Richter, T. (2001). Circular stationary solutions in two-dimensional neural fields. Biological Cybernetics, 85(3), 211-217.
60. Wilson, H., & Cowan, J. (1973). A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Biological Cybernetics, 13(2), 55-80.