Youth and parent education about diabetes complications: Health professional survey

Pediatric Diabetes

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 59-66

  Lochrie, Amanda S ^a   Wysocki, Tim ^a   Burnett, Jeanpaul ^a   Buckloh, Lisa M ^a   Antal, Holly ^a  

^a NEMOURS CHILDREN S CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Health care professionals; Long term complications; Survey

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DIABETES EDUCATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE DURATION; EMOTIONALITY; FAMILY COPING; FAMILY COUNSELING; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MENTAL DISEASE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT HEALTH SERVICES; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGE OF ONSET; CHILD; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; DIABETIC ANGIOPATHIES; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; PARENTS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; TEACHING;

EID: 59149089110     PISSN: 1399543X     EISSN: 13995448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00438.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial: Effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993: 329: 977-986.
2. DCCT Research Group. Effect of intensive treatment on the development and progression of long term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 1994: 125: 177-188.
3. Armstrong JS, Lusk EJ. Return postage in mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Public Opin Q 1987: 51: 233-248.
4. Bosnjak M, Tuten TL. Prepaid and promised incentives in web surveys: An experiment. Soc Sci Comput Rev 2003: 21: 208-217.
5. Choi BK, Pak AW, Purdham JT. Effects of mailing strategies on response rate, response time, and cost in a questionnaire study among nurses. Epidemiol 1990: 1: 72-74.
6. Church AH. Estimating the effect of incentive on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis. Publ Opin Q 1993: 57: 62-79.
7. Erwin WJ, Wheelright LA. Improving mail survey response rates through the use of a monetary incentive. J Ment Health Couns 2002: 24: 247-255.
8. Everett SA, Price JH, Bedell AW, Telljohann SK. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians. Eval Health Prof 1997: 20: 207-214.
9. Fox RJ, Crask MR, Kim J. Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Publ Opin Q 1988: 52: 467-491.
10. Helgeson JG, Voss KE, Terpening WD. Determinants of mail-survey response: Survey design factors and respondent factors. Psychol Marketing 2002: 19: 303-328.
11. Moore D, Tarnai J. Evaluating non-response error in mail surveys. In: Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RA, eds. Survey Nonresponse. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2002: 197-211.
12. Vehovar V, Batagelj Z, Lozar Manfreda K, Zaletel M. Nonresponse in web surveys. In: Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RA, eds. Survey Nonresponse. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2002: 229-242.
13. Yammarino FJ, Skinner SJ, Childers TL. Understanding mail survey response behavior. Publ Opin Q 1991: 55: 613-639.
14. Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RA. Survey Nonresponse. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2002.