A philosophical foundation for unification of dynamic modeling methods based on higher-order potentialities and their reducers

Advances in Complex Systems

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 831-860

  Bosse, Tibor ^a   Treur, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dynamics; Modeling; Philosopy of science; Potentialities

Indexed keywords

EID: 59049107439     PISSN: 02195259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S021952590800188X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, J. R. and Lebiere, C, The Atomic Components of Thought (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1998).
2. Aristotle (350 BC), Physica (trans, by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye).
3. Aristotle (350 BC), De Motu Animalium ("On the Motion of Animals" trans, by A. S. L. Farquharson).
4. Ashby, R., Design for a Brain, 2nd edn. (Chapman & Hall, London, 1960).
5. Bickhard, M. H., Representational content in humans and machines, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 5 (1993) 285-333.
6. Bickhard, M. H., Information and representation in autonomous agents, J. Cogn. Syst. Res. 1 (2000) 285-333.
7. Bosse, T., Jonker, C. M., Meij, L. van der and Treur, J., A language and environment for analysis of dynamics by simulation, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 16 (2007) 435-464.
8. Busemeyer, J., and Townsend, J. T., Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment, Psycho. Rev. 100, 432-459.
9. Delfos, M. F., Children and Behavioral Problems: Anxiety, Aggression. Depression and ADHD: A Biopsychological Model with Guidelines for Diagnostics and Treatment (Harcourt, Amsterdam, 2004).
10. Descartes, R., The World or Treatise on Light (withdrawn from publication, 1633). Also in Descartes: The World and Other Writings, ed. S. Gaukroger (Cambridge University Press, 1998).
11. Frankfurt, H. G., Freedom of the will and the concept of a person, J. Philosophy 68 (1971) 5-20.
12. Galton, A., Operators vs. arguments: The ins and outs of reification, Synthese 150 (2006) 415-441.
13. Geert, P. van, A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth, Psychol. Rev. 98 (1991) 3-56.
14. Gelder, T. J. van and Port, R., F., It's about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In: Port, R. F. and Gelder, T. van (eds.), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition (MIT Press, 1995), pp. 1-43.
15. Giunti, M., Dynamical models of cognition. In: Port, R., F. and Gelder, T. van (eds.), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition (MIT Press, 1995), pp. 549-572.
16. Gleitman, H. Psychology (W. W. Norton, New York, 1999).
17. Jonker, C. M. and Treur, J., A temporal-interactivist perspective on the dynamics of mental states, Cogn. Syst. Res. J. 4 (2003) 137-155.
18. Laird, J. E., Newell, A. and Rosenbloom, P. S., Soar: An architecture for general intelligence, Artifi. Intell. 33 (1987) 1-64.
19. Mach, E., The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development, 9th edn., trans, by T. J. McCormack (LaSalle III, 1942).
20. Moir, A. and Jessel, D., A Mind to Crime: The Controversial Link Between the Mind and Criminal Behaviur (Michael Joseph, Penguin, London, 1995).
21. Newton, I., The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, 1729. In Newton's Principles of Natural Philosophy (Dawsons of Pall Mall, 1968).
22. Port, R. F. and Gelder, T. van (eds.), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition (MIT Press, 1995).
23. Raine, A., The Psychopathology of Crime: Criminal Behaviors as a Clinical Disorder (Guilford, New York, 1993).
24. Taylor, B., Methodus incrementorum Directa et Inversa (1715).
25. Treur, J., States of change: Explaining dynamics by anticipatory state properties, Philos. Psychol. J. 18 (2005) 441-471.