Improving 24-month abstinence and employment outcomes for substance-dependent women receiving temporary assistance for needy families with intensive case management

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 328-333

  Morgenstern, Jon ^a   Neighbors, Charles J ^a   Kuerbis, Alexis ^a   Riordan, Annette ^b   Blanchard, Kimberly A ^a   McVeigh, Katharine H ^c   Morgan, Thomas J ^d   McCrady, Barbara ^e  

^a Yale School of Medicine   (United States)

^b New Jersey Department of Human Services   (United States)

^c NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE   (United States)

^d RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; EMPLOYMENT; FAMILY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; UNITED STATES; ADDICTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERVIEW; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL WELFARE; STATISTICS;

EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NEW JERSEY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL WELFARE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 59049102688     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.133553     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Gotham HJ, Sher KJ. Children of alcoholics. In: Kinney J, ed. Clinical Manual of Substance Abuse. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Mosby; 1996:272-287.
2. McGue M. Genes, environment, and the etiology of alcoholism. In: Zucker R, Boyd G, Howard J, eds. The Development of Alcohol Problems: Exploring the Biopsychological Matrix of Risk. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 1994:1-40.
3. Russell M. Prevalence of alcoholismamong children of alcoholics. In: Windle M, Searles J, eds. Children of Alcoholics: Critical Perspectives. New York, NY: Guilford; 1990:9-38.
4. Kost KA, Smyth NJ. Two strikes against them? Exploring the influence of a history of poverty and growing up in an alcoholic family on alcohol problems and income. J Soc Serv Res. 2002;28:23-52.
5. Morgenstern J, Nakashian M, Woolis DD, et al. CASAWORKS for Families: a new treatment model for substance-abusing parenting women on welfare. Eval Rev. 2003;27:583-596.
6. Meara E. Welfare reform, employment, and drug and alcohol use among low-income women. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2006;14:223-232.
7. Metsch LR, Pollack HA. Welfare reform and substance abuse. Milbank Q. 2005;83:65-99.
8. Blank R, Haskins R. The New World of Welfare. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2002.
9. Morgenstern J, Blanchard K, McCrady BS, et al. Effectiveness of intensive case management for substance-dependent women receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:2016-2023.
10. Rubinstein G. The State of State Policy on TANF and Addiction. Washington, DC: Legal Action Center; 2002.
11. Danziger SK, Seefeldt KS. Barriers to employment and the "hard to serve": implications for services, sanctions, and time limits. Focus. 2002;22:76-81.
12. Chandler D, Meisel J, Jordan P, et al. Substance abuse, employment, and welfare tenure. Soc Serv Rev. 2004;78:628-651.
13. McLellan AT. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284:1689-1695.
14. McKay JR, Lynch KG, Shepard DS, et al. The effectiveness of telephone based continuing care for alcohol and cocaine dependence: 24 month outcomes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:199-207.
15. Meara E, Frank RG. Spending on substance abuse treatment: how much is enough? Addiction. 2005;100:1240-1248.
16. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. A Look at State Welfare Reform Efforts to Address Substance Abuse. Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2002.
17. Arndt S, Black DW, Schmucker A, et al. Association among outcomes in a naturalistic statewide assessment of substance user treatment. Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39:1215-1234.
18. Morgenstern J, McCrady BS, Blanchard KA, et al. Barriers to employability among substance dependent and nonsubstance-affected women on federal welfare: implications for program design. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64:239-246.
19. Morgenstern J, Riordan A, McCrady BS, et al. Barriers to Employability Among Women on TANF With a Substance Abuse Problem. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families; 2001.
20. Kline A, Bruzios C, Rodriguez G, Mammo A. Substance Abuse Needs Assessment Survey of Recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Dept of Health; 1998.
21. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
22. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. New York, NY: Biometric Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1996.
23. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Supplementary Administration Manual for the Expanded Female Version of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) Instrument: The ASI-F. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1997. DHHS publication SMA 96-8056.
24. Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Leo GI, et al. Reliability of a timeline method: assessing normal drinkers' reports of recent drinking and a comparative evaluation across several populations. Br J Addict. 1988;83:393-402.
25. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:1049-1060.
26. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
27. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
28. StataCorp. STATA Survey Data Reference Manual Release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2005.
29. Morgenstern J, Blanchard K, Kahler CW, et al. Testing mechanisms of action for intensive case management. Addiction. 2008;103:469-477.
30. Siegal HA, Fisher J, Rapp RC, et al. Enhancing substance abuse treatment with case management and its impact on employment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1996;13:93-98.
31. McLellan AT, Gutman MA, Lynch KG, et al. One-year outcomes from the CASAWORKS for Families intervention for substance-abusing women on welfare. Eval Rev. 2003;27:656-680.
32. Zarkin GA, Dunlap LJ, Bray JW, et al. The effect of treatment completion and length of stay on employment and crime in outpatient drug-free treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;23:261-271.
33. Metsch LR, Pereyra M, Miles CC, et al. Welfare and work outcomes after substance abuse treatment. Soc Serv Rev. 2003;77:237-254.
34. Wickiezer TM, Campbell K, Krupski A, et al. Employment outcomes among AFDC recipients treated for substance abuse in Washington state. Milbank Q. 2000;78:585-608.