On the role of "a psychology of the second person" in studies of meaning, language, and mind

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 205-218

  Rommetveit, Ragnar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59049097013     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca1003_3     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Baker, G. P., & Hacker, P. M. S. (1980). Wittgenstein: Understanding and meaning. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press
3. Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
4. Bråten, S. (1998). Infant learning by altercentric perception: The reverse of egocentric observation in autism. In S. Bråten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 105-124). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
5. Cassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
6. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1-61
7. Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
8. Cutting, J. E. (1975). Aspects of phonological fusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 105-120
9. Day, R. S. (1968). Fusion in dichotic listening. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Oakland, CA
10. Deese, J. (1962). On the structure of associative meaning. Psychological Review, 69, 161-175
11. Deese, J. (1964). Form class and the determinants of association. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 79-84
12. Dilthey, W. (1894). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergleiderne psychologie [Ideas about a descriptive and analytic psychology]. Sitzungsbericht, 2, 1309-1407
13. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur experimentellen psychologie [On memory. Studies in experimental psychology]. Leipzig, Germany: Veit
14. Feigl, H. (1953). Notes on causality. In H. Feigl & M. Broadbeck (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 408-418). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
15. Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Wahrheit und methode [Truth and method]. Tübingen, Germany: J. C. Mohr
16. Habermas, J. (1963). Erkenntnis und interesse [Knowledge and interest]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp
17. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of communicative action]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp
18. Hacker, P. M. S. (1990). Chomsky's problems. Language & Communication, 10, 127-148
19. Hebb, D. (1974). What psychology is about. American Psychologist, 29, 71-79
20. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley
21. Heider, F.,&Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behaviour. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259
22. Hull, C. L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility. An experimental approach. New York: Appleton
23. Hull, C. L. (1940). Mathematico-deductive theory of rote learning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
24. Hull, C. L. (1952). A behavior system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
25. Hundeide, K. (1980). The origin of children's replies in experimental situations. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3, 77-79
26. Hundeide, K. (1985). The tacit background of children's questions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 306-322). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
27. Koch, S. (1959). Epilogue. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3). New York: McGraw-Hill
28. Kuhl, P. K. (1998). Language, culture, and intersubjectivity. In S. Bråten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 297-315). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
29. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, T. S., Shankweiler, B. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461
30. Linell, P., & Marková, I. (1993). Acts in discourse. From monological speech acts to dialogical inter-acts. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23, 174-195
31. McNeill, D. A. (1966). A study of word association. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 548-577
32. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
33. Mentzel, H. (1978). Meaning-Who needs it? In M. Brenner, P. Marsh &M. Brenner (Eds.), The social context of method (pp. 140-171). London: Croom Helm
34. Michotte, A. E. (1946). La perception de la causalité [The perception of causality]. Paris: J. Vrin
35. Miller, G. A. (1969). A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 169-191
36. Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 17, 10-28
37. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J.,&Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
38. Palermo, D. S.,&Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Word association norms: Grade school through college. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
39. Piaget, J. (1973). The child's conception of the world. London: Paladin
40. Putnam, H. (1978). Meaning and the moral sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
41. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1980). Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 111-169
42. Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor-A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Orthony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
43. Ricoeur, P. (1984). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
44. Rodi, F. (1987). Die Ebbinghaus-Dilthey Kontroverse. Biographischer Hintergrund und sachlicher Ertrag. Passauer Schriften zur. Psychologiegeschichte, 5, 145-154
45. Rommetveit, R. (1980). On "meanings" of acts and what is meant by what is said in a pluralistic social world. In M. Brenner (Ed.), The structure of action (pp. 108-149). Oxford, England: Blackwell & Mott
46. Rommetveit, R. (1988). On literacy and the myth of literal meaning. In R. Säljö (Ed.), The written world (pp. 13-40). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer
47. Rommetveit, R. (1990). On axiomatic features of a dialogically based social-cognitive approach to human cognition and communication. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 83-104). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester
48. Rommetveit, R., & Blakar, R. M. (1973). Induced semantic-associative states and resolution of binocular rivalry conflicts between letters. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 14, 185-194
49. Rommetveit, R.,&Hundeide, K. (1967). Emotive and representational components of meaning in word sorting and recall. Pedagogisk Forskning, 11, 47-59
50. Royce, J. (1892). The spirit of modern philosophy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
51. Sarason, S. B. (1981).Anasocial psychology and a misdirected clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 827-836
52. Smedslund, J. (1970). Circular relation between understanding and logic. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 65-78
53. Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. Los Angeles: University of California Press
54. Volosinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press
55. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind:Asociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
56. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
57. Winograd, T. (1980). What does it mean to understand language? Cognitive Science, 4, 200-241
58. Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, England: Blackwell