The impact of discredited evidence

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1166-1173

  Lagnado, David A ^a   Harvey, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CRIME; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; GUILT; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ATTENTION; CRIME; CULTURE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); GUILT; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; JURISPRUDENCE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROBABILITY LEARNING;

EID: 59049090297     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1166     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 91-103.
2. Hastie, R. (Ed.) (1993). Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Hatvany, N., & Strack, F. (1980). The impact of a discredited key witness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 490-509.
4. Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107-112.
5. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
6. Kennedy, T. D., & Haygood, R. C. (1992). The discrediting effect in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 70-82.
7. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference (rev. 2nd print.). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
8. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 62, 189-206.
9. Schum, D. A., & Martin, A. W. (1982). Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence. Law & Society Review, 17, 105-151.
10. Simon, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002). Structural dynamics of cognition: From consistency theories to constraint satisfaction. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 6, 283-294.
11. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.