A comparison of sodium phosphosoda purgative to polyethylene glycol bowel preparations prior to colonoscopy

Family Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 39-45

  Brunelli, Steven M ^a,b   Feldman, Harold I ^a   Latif, Sherif M ^a   Gupta, Meera ^a   Weiner, Mark G ^a   Lewis, James D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PHOSPHATES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 58949102434     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Davila RE, Rajan E, Burton TH. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:546-57.
2. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, deGarmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76-9.
3. Froelich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et. al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European Multicenter Study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-84.
4. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1147-60.
5. Wilkins T, Jester D, Kendrick J, Dahl J. The current state of colonoscopy training in family medicine residency programs. Fam Med 2004;36(5):407-11.
6. Harper MB, Mayeaux EJ, Pope JB, Goel R. Procedural training in family practice residencies: current status and impact on resident recruitment. J Am Board Fam Pract 1995;8:189-94.
7. Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterol 2007;132:2297-303.
8. Hsu CW, Imperial TF. Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:276-82.
9. Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:247-58.
10. Belsey J, Epstein O, Heresbach D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;25:373-84.
11. Schwartz D, Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in clinical trials. J Chronic Dis 1967;20:637-48.
12. Sackett D, Gent M. Controversy in counting and attributing events in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1979;301:1410-12.
13. Feinstein A. An additional basic science for clinical medicine: II. The limitations of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 1983;99:544-50.
14. Diamond G, Denton TA. Alternatives perspectives on the biased foundations of medical technology assessment. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:455-64.
15. Young CJ, Simpson RR, King DW, et al. Oral sodium phosphate solution is a superior cololoscopy preparation to polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1568-71.
16. Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG, et al. A randomized prospec- prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patient for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1990;85:422-7.
17. Law WL, Choi HK, Chu KW, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing polyethylene glycol solution, one dose, and two doses of oral sodium phosphate solution. Asian J Surg 2004;27:120-4.
18. Felt-Bersma RJ, Kooyman G, Kuipers EJ. Colonic lavage prior to endoscopy: comparable outcomes of two polyethylene-glycol preparations and a sodium-phosphate solution. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004;148:181-5.
19. Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR, et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:689-96.
20. Chia YW, Cheng LC, Goh PM, et al. Role of oral sodium phosphate and its effectiveness in large bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1995;40:373-6.
21. Arezzo A. Prospective randomized trial comparing bowel cleaning preparations for colonoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000;10:215-7.
22. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:100-4.
23. Kossi J, Kontula I, Laato M. Sodium phosphate is superior to polyethylene glycol in bowel cleansing and shortens the time it takes to visualize colon mucosa. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003;38:1187-90.
24. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E, Dube C, et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:544-52.
25. Poon CM, Lee DWH, Mak SK, et al. Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2002;34:560-3.
26. Gremse DA, Sacks AI, Raines S. Comparison of oral sodium phosphate to polyethylene glycol-based solution for bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1996;23:586-90.
27. Pontone P, Bogliolo G, Pietropaolo V, et al. Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate: comparison of two preparations for colonoscopy. G Chir 1996;17:128-31.
28. Martinek J, Hess J, Delarive J, et al. Cisapride does not improve precolonoscopy bowel preparation with either sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:180-5.
29. Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR, et al. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1218-23.
30. Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R, et al. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01). Endoscopy 2003;35:300-4.
31. Magnano A, Virgilio C, Russo V, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing colon lavage solution (PEG) with sodium phosphate solution for colonoscopy preparation. Giorn Ital Endoscop Digest 1995;18:31-6.
32. Canard JM, Gorce D, Napolean E, et al. Fleet phospho-soda for better acceptability of colon preparation prior to colonoscopy: a single-blind, randomized, comparison study versus polyethylene glycol. Acta Endoscopica 2001;31:703-8.
33. Thomson A, Naidoo P, Crotty B. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized prospective trial comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol in a predominantly elderly population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996;11:103-7.
34. Reddy DN, Rao GV, Sriram PV. Efficacy and safety of oral sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol solution for bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Indian J Gastroenterol 2002;21:219-21.
35. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:631-4.
36. Lee J, McCallion K, Acheson AG, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate bowel cleansing solutions for colonoscopy. Ulster Med J 1999;68:68-72.
37. Lapalus MG, Gaudin JL, Lemkecher T, et al. Prospective single-blinded trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001;25:29-34.
38. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise WE, et al. Colonoscopic bowel preparations - which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:594-9.
39. Seinela L, Pehkonen E, Laasanen T, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy in very old patients: a randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution. Scan J Gastroenterol 2003;38:216-20.
40. Hwang KL, Cehn WTL, Hsiao KH, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:7486-93.
41. Huppertz-Hauss G, Bretthauer M, Sauar J, et al. Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005;37:537-41.
42. Clarkson WK, Tsen TN, Dies DF, et al. Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:42-8.
43. Kastenberg D, Chasen R, Choudhary C, et al. Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:705-13.
44. Henderson JM, Barnett JL, Tugeon DK, et al. Single-day, divided-dose oral sodium phosphate laxative versus intestinal lavage as preparation for colonoscopy: efficacy and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:238-43.
45. Brunelli SM, Lewis JD, Gupta M, et al. Risk of renal injury following use of oral phosphosoda bowel preparations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:3199-205.
46. Levey AS, Greene T, Kusek JW, Beck GJ; MDRD Study Group. A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:155A.
47. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:143-59.
48. Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T, Eknoyan G, Levey AS. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;41:1-12.