Business expenditures on R&D and trade performances in Australia: Is there a link?

Applied Economics

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 351-361

  Salim, Ruhul A ^a   Bloch, Harry ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS; COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; EXPENDITURE; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; MODELING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TRADE PERFORMANCE;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA;

EID: 58949093761     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840601007302     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aiello, F. and Cardamone, P. (2005) R&D spillovers and productivity growth: Evidence from Italian manufacturing microdata. Applied Economics Letter, 12, pp. 625-631.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (several issues) Australia's R&D Indicators in International Context
3. Basile, R. (2001) Export behavior of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: The role of innovation. Research Policy, 30, pp. 1185-1201.
4. Cameron, G., Proudman, J. and Redding, S. (2005) Technology transfer, R&D, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review, 49, pp. 775-807.
5. Caves, RE et al. (1992) Industrial Efficiency in Six Nations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
6. Dosi, G., Pavitt, K. and Soete, L. (1990) The Economics of Technological Change and International Trade, Harvester Wheattsheaf Publishers, Brighton, USA
7. Engelbrecht, H-J (1998) Business sector R&D and Australia's manufacturing trade structure. Applied Economics, 30, pp. 177-187.
8. Engle, RF and Granger, CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error-correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, pp. 251-276.
9. Franko, IG (1989) Global corporate competition: Who's winning, who's losing, and the R&D factor as one reason why. Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp. 449-474.
10. Government of Australia (2005) Backing Australia's ability: An innovation action plan for the future, in Building Our Future through Science and Innovation
11. Granger, CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relationship by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, pp. 424-438.
12. Granger, CWJ (1988) Some recent developments in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39, pp. 192-211.
13. Gray, RW (1987) Why does futures trading succeed or fail: An analysis of selected commodities. Readings in Futures Markets, 3, pp. 235-248. Chicago Board of Trade, Chicago
14. Gruber, W., Mehta, D. and Vernon, RHG (1967) The R&D factor in international trade and international investment of the United States industries. Journal of Political Economy, 75, pp. 20-37.
15. Hacker, RS and Hatemi-J, A. (2005) The effect of regime shifts on the longrun relationships for Swedish money demand. Applied Economics, 37, pp. 1131-1136.
16. Hatemi-J, A. and Shukur, G. (1999) The causal nexus of government spending and revenue in Finland: A bootstrap approach. Applied Economics Lettesr, 6, pp. 641-644.
17. Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, pp. 169-211.
18. Kouassi, E., Decaluwe, B., Kapombe, CM and Colyer, D. (1999) Temporal causality and the dynamic interactions between terms of trade and current account deficits in cointegrated VAR process: Further evidence from Ivorian time series. Applied Economics, 31, pp. 89-96.
19. Landermann, M. and Pfaffermayer, M. (1997) Technological competition and trade performance. Applied Economics, 29, pp. 1979-1996.
20. Lisman, JHC and Sandee, J. (1964) Derivation of quarterly figures from annual data. Applied Statistics, 13, pp. 87-90.
21. MacKinnon, J. (1991) Critical values for cointegration tests. Longrun Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration, pp. 267-277. Oxford University Press, New York
22. Mansfield, E., Romeo, A. and Wagner, S. (1979) Foreign trade and US research and development. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61, pp. 49-57.
23. Narayan, PK (2005) The structure of tourist expenditure in Fiji: evidence from unit root structural break tests. Applied Economics, 37, pp. 1157-1161.
24. Narayan, PK and Smyth, R. (2005) Temporal causality and the dynamics of democracy, emigration and real income in Fiji. International Review of Applied Economics, 19, pp. 245-263.
25. New York Times (1993) Japanese display technology, August
26. OECD (2004) OECD, main science and technology indicators
27. Perron, P. (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57, pp. 1361-1401.
28. Perron, P. (1997) Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. Journal of Econometrics, 80, pp. 355-385.
29. Salman, AK and Shukur, G. (2004) Testing for granger causality between industrial output and CPI in the presence of regime shift Swedish data. Journal of Economic Studies, 31, pp. 492-499.
30. Sims, AC (1972) Money, income and causality. American Economic Review, 62, pp. 540-552.
31. Sims, AC (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48, pp. 1-48.
32. Wakelin, K. (1998) The role of innovation in bilateral OECD trade performance. Applied Economics, 30, pp. 1335-1346.
33. Zivot, E. and Andrews, D. (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, pp. 936-954.