Local perianal nerve block versus spinal block for closed hemorrhoidectomy: A ramdomized controlled trial

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 91, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1862-1867

  Anannamcharoen, Sahaphol ^a   Cheeranont, Piyapan ^a   Boonya usadon, Chinnakrit ^a  

^a PHRAMONGKUTKLAO HOSPITAL   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Bupivacaine; Hemorrhoid surgery; Hemorrhoidectomy; Perianal nerve block; Spinal anesthesia

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; BUPIVACAINE; EPHEDRINE; MIDAZOLAM; PARACETAMOL; PETHIDINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIZZINESS; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; INJECTION SITE PAIN; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE THROMBOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIDE EFFECT; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; URINE RETENTION; VOMITING; ANAL CANAL; DRUG EFFECT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; INFUSION; INNERVATION; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ANAL CANAL; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; BUPIVACAINE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, PARENTERAL; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;

EID: 58949089502     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Argov S, Levandovsky O. Radical, ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 69-72.
2. Hunt L, Luck AJ, Rudkin G, Hewett PJ. Day-case hemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 255-8.
3. Lohsiriwat V, Lohsiriwat D. Ambulatory anorectal surgery under perianal anesthetics infiltration: analysis of 222 cases. J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90: 278-81.
4. Fleischer M, Marini CP, Statman R, Capella J, Shevde K. Local anesthesia is superior to spinal anesthesia for anorectal surgical procedures. Am Surg 1994; 60: 812-5.
5. McConnell JC, Khubchandani IT. Long-term follow-up of closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1983; 26: 797-9.
6. Prasad ML, Abcarian H. Urinary retention following operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 1978; 21: 490-2.
7. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 477-81.
8. Leff EI. Hemorrhoidectomy - laser vs. nonlaser: outpatient surgical experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 743-6.
9. Wang JY, Chang-Chien CR, Chen JS, Lai CR, Tang RP. The role of lasers in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 78-82.
10. Lepor H. Role of long-acting selective alpha-1 blockers in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17: 651-9.
11. Tammela T. Prevention of prolonged voiding problems after unexpected postoperative urinary retention: comparison of phenoxybenzamine and carbachol. J Urol 1986; 136: 1254-7.
12. Petros JG, Bradley TM. Factors influencing postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing surgery for benign anorectal disease. Am J Surg 1990; 159: 374-6.