Navel Jewelry Artifacts and Intravertebral Variation in Spine Bone Densitometry in Adolescents and Young Women

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 84-88

  Ott, Susan M ^a,c   Ichikawa, Laura E ^c   LaCroix, Andrea Z ^b,c   Scholes, Delia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent; artifact; body piercing; navel jewelry

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; JEWELRY; LUMBAR SPINE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; UMBILICUS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADOLESCENT; ARTIFACTS; BODY PIERCING; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODIES; HUMANS; JEWELRY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58949085490     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Krueger D., Checovich M., Gemar D., et al. Calcium supplement ingestion may alter lumbar spine bone mineral density measurement. J Clin Densitom 9 (2006) 159-163
2. Morgan S.L., Lopez-Ben R., Nunnally N., et al. The effect of common artifacts lateral to the spine on bone mineral density in the lumbar spine. J Clin Densitom 11 (2008) 243-249
3. Watts N.B. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int 15 (2004) 847-854
4. Laumann A.E., and Derick A.J. Tattoos and body piercings in the United States: a national data set. J Am Acad Dermatol 55 (2006) 413-421
5. Mayers L.B., Judelson D.A., Moriarty B.W., and Rundell K.W. Prevalence of body art (body piercing and tattooing) in university undergraduates and incidence of medical complications. Mayo Clin Proc 77 (2002) 29-34
6. Mayers L.B., and Chiffriller S.H. Body art (body piercing and tattooing) among undergraduate university students: "then and now". J Adolesc Health 42 (2008) 201-203
7. Scholes D., LaCroix A.Z., Ichikawa L.E., et al. Change in bone mineral density among adolescent women using and discontinuing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159 (2005) 139-144
8. Scholes D., Lacroix A.Z., Ott S.M., et al. Bone mineral density in women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Obstet Gynecol 93 (1999) 233-238
9. Kelly T. Bone mineral density reference databases for American men and women. J Bone Miner Res 5 Suppl 2 (1990) S249
10. Lodder M.C., Lems W.F., Ader H.J., et al. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice. Ann Rheum Dis 63 (2004) 285-289
11. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
12. Engelke K., and Gluer C.C. Quality and performance measures in bone densitometry: part 1: errors and diagnosis. Osteoporos Int 17 (2006) 1283-1292
13. Gluer C.C., Blake G., Lu Y., et al. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 5 (1995) 262-270
14. Baim S., Wilson C.R., Lewiecki E.M., et al. Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Densitom 8 (2005) 371-378
15. Hans D., Downs Jr. R.W., Duboeuf F., et al. Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom 9 (2006) 15-21