Difficulty, discrimination, and information indices in the linear factor analysis model for continuous item responses

Applied Psychological Measurement

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 9-24

  Ferrando, Pere J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

Factor analysis; Item difficulty; Item discrimination; Item information; Item response theory; Multidimensional item indices; Personality and attitude measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 58849166235     PISSN: 01466216     EISSN: 15523497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146621608314608     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Ackerman, T. (1994). Creating a test information profile for a two-dimensional latent space. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 257-276.
2. Ackerman, T. (1996). Graphical representation of multidimensional item response theory analyses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 311-330.
3. Aguilar, A. (1984). CAR cuestionario de ansiedad y rendimiento [Questionnaire of Anxiety and Performance]. Unpublished manuscript, University of Barcelona, Spain.
4. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
5. Atkinson, L. (1988). The measurement-statistics controversy: Factor analysis and subinterval data. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 361-364.
6. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397-423). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Cattell, R.B. (1986). The psychometric properties of tests: Consistency, validity, and efficiency. In R. B. Cattell & R. C. Johnson (Eds.), Functional psychological testing (pp. 54-78). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
8. Comrey, A.L., & Lee, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Coombs, C.H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: John Wiley.
10. Cronbach, L.J., & Glesser, G.C. (1964). The signal/ noise ratio in the comparison of reliability coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24, 467-480.
11. Dawes, R.M. (1972). Fundamentals of attitude measurement. New York: John Wiley.
12. Ferrando, P.J. (2002). Theoretical and empirical comparisons between two models for continuous item responses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 521-542.
13. Ferrando, P.J. (2004). Kernel-smoothing estimation of item characteristic functions for continuous personality items: An empirical comparison with the linear and the continuous response models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 95-109.
14. Floyd, F.J., & Widaman, K.F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
15. Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Hampson, S.E. (1982). The construction of personality. London: Routledge.
17. Hofstee, W.K.B., Ten Berge, J.M.F., & Hendricks, A.A.J. (1998). How to score questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 897-910.
18. Howe, W.G. (1955). Some contributions to factor analysis (Report No. ORNL-1919). Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
19. Jackson, D.N. (1986). The process of responding in personality assessment. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires (pp. 123-143). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
20. Joreskog, K.G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.
21. Joreskog, K.G. (1979). Author's addendum to: A general approach to confirmatory factor analysis. In J. Madgison (Ed.), Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models (pp. 40-43). Cambridge, MA: Abt.
22. Kuncel, R.B. (1973). Response processes and relative location of subjects and items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 545-563.
23. Levine, R., & Lord, F.M. (1959). An index of the discriminating power of a test at different parts of the score range. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 19, 497-503.
24. Lord, F.M. (1952). A theory of test scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 7.
25. Lord, F.M. (1953). The relation of test score to the trait underlying the test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13, 517-548.
26. Lord, F.M., & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27. Lucke, J.F. (2005). The α and the ω of congeneric test theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 65-81.
28. Matlab. (1999). MATLAB 5.3 Release 11.1 [Computer software]. Natick, MA: MathWorks.
29. McDonald, R.P. (1962). Nonlinear factor analysis. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 15.
30. McDonald, R.P. (1982). Linear versus nonlinear models in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 379-396.
31. McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. McDonald, R.P. (2000). A basis for multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 99-114.
33. Mellenbergh, G.J. (1994). A unidimensional latent trait model for continuous item responses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 223-237.
34. Mellenbergh, G.J. (1996). Measurement precision in test score and item response models. Psychological Methods, 1, 293-299.
35. Muller, H. (1987). A Rasch model for continuous ratings. Psychometrika, 52, 165-181.
36. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B. (1999). Mplus user's guide [Computer software and manual]. Los Angeles: Authors.
37. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. Oort, F.J. (1992). Using restricted factor analysis to detect item bias. Methodika, 6, 150-166.
39. Reckase, M.D. (1985). The difficulty of test items that measure more than one ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 401-412.
40. Reckase, M.D. (1997). A linear logistic multidimensional model for dichotomous item response data. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 271-286). New York: Springer.
41. Reckase, M.D., & McKinley, R.L. (1991). The discriminating power of items that measure more than one dimension. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 361-373.
42. Samejima, F. (1973). Homogeneous case of the continuous response model. Psychometrika, 38, 203-219.
43. Samejima, F. (1974). Normal ogive model on the continuous response level in the multidimensional latent space. Psychometrika, 39, 111-121.
44. Samejima, F. (1977). Weakly parallel tests in latent trait theory with some criticism of classical test theory. Psychometrika, 42, 193-198.
45. Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-293.
46. Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., Pyszczynski, T., & Green-berg, J. (1983). An item response theory for personality and attitude scales: Item analysis using restricted factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 211-226.
47. Waller, N.G., Tellegen, A., McDonald, R.P., & Lykken, D.T. (1996). Exploring nonlinear models in personality assessment: Development and validation of a negative emotionality scale. Journal of Personality, 64, 545-576.