Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 84-88

  Minnigh, Todd R ^a   Gallet, Jacqueline ^a  

^a CARESTREAM HEALTH INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed radiography; Dashboard; Digital radiography; Dose; Productivity; Quality control; Quality management; Radiology management; Repeat analysis; Workflow

Indexed keywords

COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; DASHBOARD; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; DOSE; PRODUCTIVITY; RADIOLOGY MANAGEMENT; REPEAT ANALYSIS; WORKFLOW;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; RADIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; X RAY ANALYSIS; X RAY RADIOGRAPHY;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIST; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; X RAY; X RAY ANALYSIS;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 58849143102     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9098-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BI Reiner EL Siegel JA Carrino 2002 SCAR Radiologic Technologist Survey: Analysis of the impact of digital technologies on productivity J Digit Imaging 15 3 132 140
2. BI Reiner EL Siegel JA Carrino 2002 SCAR Radiologic technologist survey: Analysis of technologist workforce and staffing J Digit Imaging 15 3 121 131
3. BI Reiner EL Siegel 2002 Changes in technologist productivity with implementation of an enterprise-wide PACS J Digit Imaging 15 22 26
4. BI Reiner EL Siegel FJ Hooper 1998 Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists Radiology 207 481 485
5. BI Reiner EL Siegel 2002 Technologist productivity in the performance of general radiographic examinations: Comparison of film-based versus filmless operations AJR 179 33 37
6. Reiner BI, Siegel EL: PACS and productivity. In: Siegel EL, Kolodner RM Eds. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1999, pp 103-112
7. BI Reiner EL Siegel K Siddiqui 2003 Evolution of the digital revolution: A radiologist perspective J Digit Imaging 16 4 324 330
8. C Wideman J Gallet 2006 Analog to digital workflow improvement: A quantitative study J Digit Imaging 19 1 29 34
9. J Nol G Isousard J Mirecki 2006 Digital repeat analysis: Setup and operation J Digit Imaging 19 2 159 166
10. R Honea ME Blado Y Ma 2002 Is reject analysis necessary after converting to computed radiography? J Digit Imaging 15 1 41 52
11. SM Ertuk S Ordategui-Parra PR Ros 2005 Quality management in radiology: Historical aspects and basic definitions J Am Coll Radiol 2 12 985 991
12. AR Benedetto 2003 Six Sigma: Not for the faint of heart Radiol Manage 25 2 40 53
13. PD Murphy 1992 An annual strategy for total quality Radiol Manage 14 3 58 63
14. A Adler R Carlton B Wold 1992 An analysis of radiographic repeat and reject rates Radiol Technol 63 5 308 14
15. G Gadeholt JT Geitung JH Gothlin T Asp 1989 Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program Eur J Radiol 9 3 137 41
16. S Watkinson BM Moores SJ Hill 1984 Reject analysis: Its role in quality assurance Radiography 50 593 189 94